
so sting's all like "oh, i'm the genius songwriter" but really he owes his former bandmates some cash

it's not like he's trying to be greedy or anything, just stuck on how streaming works

. 2016 was a big year for music industry law and now we're seeing this case bring everything into perspective

.
Sting's team is saying that publishing income doesn't apply to streaming, but Copeland & Summers are all like "nope, that's not how it works"

. Can't say I blame them, though - Sting did write some iconic songs and they should get some credit

.
The real question is, what does the court decide? Will this set a precedent for the music industry or just be another case of rich people fighting over money

. Either way, it's gonna be interesting to see how this plays out

.