I'm not buying it just yet. I mean, regulators are taking allegations seriously? That's like saying "I'm shocked" when you know someone's been caught red-handed. What's the timeline on these investigations again? And what exactly does "reviewing a letter from Warren" mean in practice? Is she just blowing smoke, or is there actual evidence being gathered?And don't even get me started on JP Morgan's denials. Yeah right, ending all relations with Epstein six years before he got arrested and didn't commit any crimes? It sounds like they're covering their tracks to me. I'd love to see some concrete numbers and dates on those 134 accounts – that just seems too convenient.
I'm not saying the regulators are in cahoots or anything, but... sources, please?
. If the regulators are taking these allegations seriously, that means someone needs to get held accountable for enabling this monster's abuse. It's not just about JP Morgan, either - we need to be looking at the bigger picture of how our financial systems can be used to facilitate heinous crimes.
. The fact that JP Morgan is trying to downplay their role in all this is just making it worse. We need more transparency and accountability, not less. I'm keeping my eye on this one, folks...
so many people got hurt by Epstein's crimes and now these regulators are taking it very seriously 
hopefully they'll find out who knew what and when 
gotta give props to senator Elizabeth Warren for speaking up about this stuff 
! i think reg's are finally takin this seriously tho - they gotta investigate banks like jp morgan chase 4 enabling epstein's crimes. it's like, if u r a banker u gotta be held accountable 4 ur actions not 2 just protect ur own interests 
. and btw, why does trump get 2 sign bills related 2 epstein & maxwell w/o any real scrutiny? 
JP morgan needs to come clean about their dealings with him, 134 accounts and $1b in transactions? that's not just suspicious, that's basically an investigation waiting to happen