A high-ranking official in Georgia's prosecutor council has just handed the presidential election interference case against Donald Trump his head on a silver platter, allowing the former President to walk away unscathed. The decision is nothing short of astonishing, given that the evidence presented was overwhelming.
The facts are stark: Trump enlisted a coterie of co-conspirators to threaten state election officials, and even went so far as to ask Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to "find" enough votes that would reverse his defeat in 2020. He explicitly stated, "I just want to find 11,780 votes... All I need is one more than we have." This wasn't a reasonable request; it was an instruction.
Trump's words and actions should have been subject to a full adversarial trial, with the truth revealed through the testimony of those directly involved. Instead, the council has seen fit to shred the case, taking it apart charge by charge in a 22-page filing. The grand jury indictment that preceded this decision found Trump and his accomplices guilty of racketeering charges.
It's hard not to wonder what other motives were at play here. Skandalakis' decision appears to be driven more by a desire to avoid controversy than to uphold justice. He invoked the foundational principles of free speech and electoral scrutiny, but conveniently chose to ignore the specifics of Trump's actions. The council is now left with the onerous task of finding someone to lead the prosecution of a criminal defendant who once again resides at the White House.
The case against Trump has been reduced to nothing more than a series of interpretations and justifications that serve to whitewash history. Skandalakis' handling of this case muddies the record, depriving future generations of the chance to make up their own minds about what did – and could have – happened in Georgia in 2020 and 2021.
This decision smacks of a desire for expediency over justice, one that prioritizes avoiding controversy over confronting truth. As such, it's clear that Trump has once again managed to wriggle free from accountability, thanks to the leniency of those in power.
The facts are stark: Trump enlisted a coterie of co-conspirators to threaten state election officials, and even went so far as to ask Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger to "find" enough votes that would reverse his defeat in 2020. He explicitly stated, "I just want to find 11,780 votes... All I need is one more than we have." This wasn't a reasonable request; it was an instruction.
Trump's words and actions should have been subject to a full adversarial trial, with the truth revealed through the testimony of those directly involved. Instead, the council has seen fit to shred the case, taking it apart charge by charge in a 22-page filing. The grand jury indictment that preceded this decision found Trump and his accomplices guilty of racketeering charges.
It's hard not to wonder what other motives were at play here. Skandalakis' decision appears to be driven more by a desire to avoid controversy than to uphold justice. He invoked the foundational principles of free speech and electoral scrutiny, but conveniently chose to ignore the specifics of Trump's actions. The council is now left with the onerous task of finding someone to lead the prosecution of a criminal defendant who once again resides at the White House.
The case against Trump has been reduced to nothing more than a series of interpretations and justifications that serve to whitewash history. Skandalakis' handling of this case muddies the record, depriving future generations of the chance to make up their own minds about what did – and could have – happened in Georgia in 2020 and 2021.
This decision smacks of a desire for expediency over justice, one that prioritizes avoiding controversy over confronting truth. As such, it's clear that Trump has once again managed to wriggle free from accountability, thanks to the leniency of those in power.