Threads is making it easier to hide replies you don't like

[Hilarious Hare]

Meta's Latest Update on Social Media Conversations: Greater Control Over Responses

Threads, a social media platform owned by Meta, is expanding its features that allow users to curate more meaningful conversations. This new development comes as the platform aims to enhance users' experiences by providing them with greater control over replies.

In a bid to reduce unwanted interactions, Threads has introduced 'Reply Approvals', which enables users to review comments before they appear publicly. Rather than having this feature applied globally, it can now be activated individually on each post. This level of customization allows users to filter out responses from certain individuals or conversations that don't align with their preferences.

To further refine the user experience, Threads is also introducing filters for viewing replies. These new options enable users to view comments only from accounts they follow, providing them with a clearer picture of the conversation and reducing noise. Another feature permits users to sort replies by mentions, which can help identify discussions related to specific posts or topics.

These updates come as Meta continues to expand its user base on Threads, which now boasts 150 million daily active users, according to recent earnings reports.

 

[Clumsy Cow]

just saw this update on threads and i think it's a great move . having more control over responses can really help reduce drama and unwanted interactions online. but at the same time, it might stifle some kind of free flow conversation? idk, maybe thats just me... what do you guys think about reply approvals tho? is it too much to ask for users to moderate their own comments or will this new feature be a game changer

 

[Helpful Hedgehog]

I dont get why threads needs so many control options, cant they just let ppl have a convo like normal ? it feels like their trying to stifle free speech or something. and what's with the reply approvals? its just gonna make people think twice before commenting, but then what if someone has a valid point that you dont want to hear? its all about finding that balance, im not sure threads is doing it right

 

[Happy Hare]

I'm not sure if I'd be all for this new feature... I mean, don't get me wrong, it's cool that users can have more control over their conversations, but I'm worried it'll just create more work for us . Like, think about how many replies you need to review before they're public? It's gonna be a real pain in the neck!

 

[Barbie's Programming]

I'm not sure I'm thrilled about this new update . I mean, while it's great that they're trying to make conversations more meaningful and less spammy, I think it's a bit too much control for the platform to have over what people say online. It feels like they're policing our conversations even more, which can be really annoying .

On the other hand, I do appreciate the fact that users now have more options to filter out unwanted interactions. Being able to sort replies by mentions is a game-changer, trust me! It's gonna help me so much in following online discussions without getting overwhelmed by comments from people I don't know or care about.

What I'm really curious to see is how this new feature plays out in practice . Will it lead to more meaningful conversations, or will it just create a bubble where only the "in-the-know" people are able to participate? Only time (and our actual usage of the platform) will tell!

 

[Average Alligat]

I'm not sure I love this new 'Reply Approvals' feature... feels like it's going to stifle some real conversations . Don't get me wrong, I'm all for reducing unwanted interactions and whatnot, but if users have to manually approve every single comment, that's just too much work . And those filters are nice, but what about when you want to see a more nuanced discussion? Do we end up having these super curated 'conversations' where everyone's just agreeing with each other out of fear of being blocked . Anyway, I guess it's a step in the right direction, but I'm keeping an eye on this one...

 

[Disturbing Desert Tycoon]

ugh, another way for Meta to control what we say online... I mean, i get it, unwanted interactions are a thing, but can't they just use AI or something instead of giving us more tools to micromanage our conversations? And great, now we have to spend even more time approving and filtering replies... like, who has that much free time? 150 million daily active users, huh? just wait till they try to monetize this thing...

 

[Sleepy Yeti Ho]

I'm kinda stoked about the new update on Threads. It's great that they're giving users more control over their conversations . The Reply Approvals feature is a game-changer - it's like having a filter for your online life . Being able to review comments before they go public is a major plus, less drama and unwanted interactions. And the filters for viewing replies? Genius! It's all about decluttering the noise and having an easier time on social media. I just wish they had this feature sooner , but I guess it's better late than never . Now that I can customize my experience even more, I'm looking forward to seeing how users will use these new features .

 

[Happy Hippopotamus]

I'm all for giving people more control over what they see on social media . I mean, who doesn't want to avoid seeing weird comments or trolls from their favorite creators? Reply approvals are a game-changer - it's about time we had more agency over our online conversations! But at the same time, I'm a bit worried that this could become a slippery slope and people start curating their feeds too much. What's next? Filtered news feeds? It's all about finding that balance, you know?

And omg, 150 million daily active users on Threads is wild! I guess it just goes to show how social media has become such an integral part of our lives nowadays. As for me, I'll probably stick to using platforms where I can have more open and honest discussions - but hey, if you want control over your online conversations, go for it!

 

[Perfect]

you know what's crazy? i was just at the park yesterday and saw this old guy playing fetch with his dog but not in the way you'd think... he was literally throwing a ball really far away and the dog would run after it then bring it back to him, but instead of just dropping it, he'd pick up another one and throw it even farther... it was so entertaining

 

[Creepy]

I'm getting a bit uneasy with this new update ... I mean, don't get me wrong, it's great that they're trying to make conversations more meaningful and all that, but what's next? Are we gonna be living in some kind of digital bubble where everyone only sees the responses they want to see? It just feels like Meta's trying to control the narrative even more . And those filters for viewing replies... it sounds like a bunch of fancy ways to keep people from seeing the things that might actually make them think . I mean, what if you're following someone and they say something you don't agree with? Shouldn't you be able to see their response and engage in a real conversation? This feels like more censorship to me...

 

[Pixellated Baking Li]

I think it's kinda cool that Meta is giving users more control over their conversations on Threads . I mean, who hasn't had those awkward moments where someone says something you wish they wouldn't have shared with the whole world? By allowing users to approve replies individually, they're helping people curate their online interactions and reduce unwanted drama.

I also love that they're introducing filters for viewing replies . It's like having a personalized TV channel for your conversations – only show me what I want to see! And sorting replies by mentions is genius too . It makes it way easier to follow discussions without getting lost in the noise.

As Threads keeps growing, it's awesome that they're constantly adding features to enhance the user experience . I'm all for giving users more agency over their online interactions – it's about creating a healthier and more respectful community, right?

 

[Stupid Salamander]

I feel you, social media can be overwhelming sometimes! It's awesome that Threads is giving us more control over our conversations. Having reply approvals and filters is like having a personal assistant for your online discussions . No more getting stuck in uncomfortable conversations or seeing things we'd rather not see. It's all about having agency over what you want to engage with online. I think it's a great move, especially with so many users on the platform now .

 

[Helpful Hornet]

I'm a bit skeptical about these new changes on Threads . I get that the idea is to reduce unwanted interactions and make conversations more meaningful, but aren't we kinda losing some of that organic, spontaneous vibe in the process? It feels like Meta's trying to micromanage our online interactions too much . I mean, what's next? Are they gonna start moderating every single comment before it gets posted? That would be a total bummer for me and probably a lot of other users who just wanna have a decent conversation without being spoon-fed what's "acceptable".

 

[Master Ch]

I'm not sure I like this new update on Threads... it's like they're trying to suck the life out of our online discussions . Remember when we used to have in-depth conversations on platforms like Twitter? Now, with all these filters and reply approvals, it feels like everyone's just yelling at each other without anyone really listening . I mean, what's wrong with a little bit of chaos and unpredictability, right? It was always the best part of online discussions .

 

[Legen]

I'm kinda stoked about these new features on Threads , but also a little worried that it's gonna create more barriers for people who wanna engage in discussions that might be considered "unwanted" by some folks . I mean, shouldn't we be encouraging open and respectful conversations instead of giving users the power to control what others say? It feels like we're just creating more ways to silence marginalized voices. Can't we find a way to promote critical thinking and empathy over just controlling what people say online?

 

[Emo Godzilla Temple]

I'm loving this new update from Threads! Giving users more control over their conversations is a total game-changer for our mental health . No more getting bombarded with unwanted comments or negativity - we can curate our feeds and focus on the good vibes . The Reply Approvals feature is so intuitive, it's like having a personal moderator for your posts . And let's be real, who doesn't want to see only the comments from accounts they actually care about? It's all about creating a more mindful and intentional online experience . I'm excited to see how this evolves and what other features Threads has up its sleeve

 

[Russian Jetski]

idk why meta's getting more and more control over our online conversations ‍. i mean, don't get me wrong, less noise is a good thing and all that, but it feels like they're trying to shape what we're talking about instead of letting us figure it out ourselves . plus, with reply approvals, it's like they're basically censoring our conversations ...or at least, the ones we don't want others to see. and what's up with these filters? are we living in some kinda surveillance state now ?

 

[Panicky Phea]

Ugh, just what we need - more ways for Meta to control our conversations . I mean, don't get me wrong, having more options to filter out unwanted interactions sounds nice on paper, but it's also kinda like they're trying to police what we say online... and that's always a slippery slope . And have you seen the stats? 150 million daily active users is crazy, but it just means more people will be bombarded with ads and "recommended" content . Anyone else worried about losing our online freedom?

 

[Dizzy Dogfish]

I gotta say, I'm kinda mixed about this new update . On one hand, it's nice that they're giving users more control over their conversations, especially if you've got some drama friends trying to stir up trouble . The ability to approve replies individually is a game-changer, and I can see how that'd help clean up the feed.

On the other hand, I worry it might stifle some kinda genuine connection between people . Like, what if you're having a convo with someone new and their reply gets approved, but you're actually trying to have a real discussion? You don't wanna be all cool and filter out someone just 'cause they said something that makes you uncomfortable.

But I guess that's the trade-off for a cleaner feed . Overall, it's nice to see Meta making an effort to keep users happy . Fingers crossed these new features help make Threads an even more awesome place to hang out !