'This is history, it should be free': Rome's €2 Trevi fountain fee divides opinion

Rome's Trevi Fountain Fee Sparks Debate Over Access to Historical Landmark

A €2 fee for accessing Rome's iconic Trevi fountain has sparked heated debate among tourists and locals alike. The new charge, which applies weekdays from 11:30am to 10pm and weekends from 9am to 10pm, aims to help the city manage crowds and raise funds for the fountain's upkeep.

Teresa Romero, a Portuguese tourist celebrating her milestone birthday in Rome, was among the first to experience the fee firsthand. "I think it's normal and €2 is nothing – the price of a coffee," she said. However, not everyone shares her sentiment. Irma Pavitashvili from Georgia expressed frustration, stating, "This fountain should be for everyone." Alma Peterson, a visitor from the US, echoed her sentiments, saying, "It's not right to charge people – this is history, it should be free."

The fee has been implemented after years of discussions among local authorities. Simona Ugolinelli, a councillor in charge of coordinating the measure, argued that the small payment would allow for better preservation of the Trevi fountain and other historical landmarks. "This is a very small payment to allow us to protect the Trevi fountain," she said.

The fee is expected to generate €6.5 million annually, which will be invested in the fountain's upkeep and other monuments in Rome. While some welcome this initiative, others are concerned that such charges could become more widespread as tourism continues to rise in Italy.

Since 2023, a €5 fee has been in place at the Pantheon, another famous historical site in Rome. The Pantheon's director reported that the fee has been "working very well," managing large crowds and generating significant revenue for the site's maintenance.

As Rome becomes increasingly popular among tourists, charges to access historic sites are becoming more common. Venice, Italy, recently introduced a fee for day trippers during peak season, while visitors to Verona have had to pay to enter the courtyard associated with Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet since December.

The Trevi fountain fee is another step in Rome's efforts to balance tourism with preservation of its rich historical heritage. While opinions on the fee are divided, one thing is clear: this small charge has sparked a lively debate about the value of preserving our cultural treasures for future generations.
 
I'm loving this new trend of cities getting smart about managing tourist crowds 🤩! Rome's €2 Trevi fountain fee might seem like a small price to pay, but think about all the money that'll go towards maintaining one of the world's most iconic landmarks 💸. I mean, €6.5 million is no joke – it's like, a small fortune 🤑. And let's be real, if you're not willing to part with 2 euros for a historic landmark, maybe you shouldn't be taking selfies in front of it 🤣. On the other hand, I get why some people are upset about paying a fee to access these sites – after all, history should be for everyone, not just those who shell out extra cash 💖. But at the end of the day, it's all about finding that balance between preserving our cultural heritage and making it accessible to the masses 🌎.
 
I'm all for paying a small fee to see these incredible landmarks. I mean, €2 is like nothing, right? But at the same time, I get why locals might be frustrated – it's not like they're trying to charge us to breathe air or something! 🤷‍♀️ The thing is, with so many tourists flooding Rome every year, it's getting pretty crowded and worn out. It'd be a shame if we didn't do anything to help preserve these amazing sites.

I've been thinking about visiting the Pantheon soon and I'm kinda excited about paying that €5 fee... but at the same time, I'm also a bit miffed that we have to pay for something that's already paid for by our tax dollars, you know? 🤔 It's like, shouldn't these places be free for everyone?

I guess it's all about finding that balance between tourism and preservation. I just hope the €6.5 million they're raising will actually go towards maintaining these sites, not just lining some pockets... 💸
 
🤔 I dunno, €2 seems like a lot for just lookin' at some old water and statues. I mean, I get it, the city needs money to keep the fountain lookin' good, but can't they just find other ways to make that happen? Like, maybe they could raise funds through donations or somethin'. And what's with all these new fees poppin' up everywhere? It feels like they're just tryin' to nickel and dime tourists till there's nothing left. 🤑 I guess it's better than nothin', but I'd still prefer a free Trevi fountain experience. Just sayin'. 😐
 
seen this news and I'm not surprised 🤔 the amount they're charging €2 isn't that bad but some ppl's gotta remember it's a historical site and we cant just leave it to decay 💸. its like paying for a coffee shop or something u know? still, I get why ppl are complaining about it esp tourists who come here to experience the culture & history 🌟
 
come on, €2 isn't that bad considering all the damage that fountain's been taking over the years 🤷‍♂️. plus it's just one of many historical sites in rome - charge people to visit and they can use that money to restore the others too 🌟. i mean, think about it, €6.5 million a year is nothing compared to what tourists spend on overpriced gelato and souvenirs 😂. and honestly, some of these places are straight up crowded - maybe this fee will be enough to deter some people who don't even know the history behind the fountain 🤓. but seriously, if it means preserving the trevi for future generations, then i'm all for it 💯.
 
I'm so done with these touristy fees, €2 is like 50p in my pocket 💸👎! I mean, Rome's got plenty of other free stuff to explore, like Villa Borghese or the Spanish Steps. You can't put a price on history, mate 🤣. And what's next? Paying to breathe some fresh air in the Colosseum? 😂 I don't think so! The city should be making money off all these tourists, not charging them for every little thing 🤑.
 
Back
Top