Iran's protests are another test of the regime's resolve under mounting pressure. The demonstrations, sparked by rocketing inflation and a plummeting currency, have since evolved into a broader movement with thousands taking to the streets in Tehran, setting fire to vehicles and government buildings.
Opponents of the regime have long predicted its demise, citing past crackdowns on protesters. However, these predictions were largely based on a more limited scope of discontent, whereas this unrest is taking place in parts of society that have traditionally been more supportive of the regime.
The Iranian leadership has responded with brutal force, with dozens of people, including children, already reported dead. The supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, initially acknowledged legitimate economic demands but has since turned on "saboteurs" who he claims are being backed by Donald Trump. This narrative may have been a ploy to deflect attention from the regime's own failures.
The government faces significant internal and external challenges, including an increasingly limited economic room for manoeuvre and a severely degraded axis of resistance. The recent 12-day war with Israel and US attack on nuclear facilities have eroded the regime's credibility on security. Meanwhile, Trump's threat to intervene has been met with skepticism by many Iranians.
The situation is becoming increasingly precarious, with risks of entrenchment rather than weakening of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps's power. Iran's defence council has warned of pre-emptive military action if it perceives a threat from the US and Israel.
As external actors jockey for position, they must avoid contributing to further bloodshed and suffering by exploiting genuine grievances for their own purposes. The easiest exit would be the one that preserves stability rather than exacerbates instability.
Opponents of the regime have long predicted its demise, citing past crackdowns on protesters. However, these predictions were largely based on a more limited scope of discontent, whereas this unrest is taking place in parts of society that have traditionally been more supportive of the regime.
The Iranian leadership has responded with brutal force, with dozens of people, including children, already reported dead. The supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, initially acknowledged legitimate economic demands but has since turned on "saboteurs" who he claims are being backed by Donald Trump. This narrative may have been a ploy to deflect attention from the regime's own failures.
The government faces significant internal and external challenges, including an increasingly limited economic room for manoeuvre and a severely degraded axis of resistance. The recent 12-day war with Israel and US attack on nuclear facilities have eroded the regime's credibility on security. Meanwhile, Trump's threat to intervene has been met with skepticism by many Iranians.
The situation is becoming increasingly precarious, with risks of entrenchment rather than weakening of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps's power. Iran's defence council has warned of pre-emptive military action if it perceives a threat from the US and Israel.
As external actors jockey for position, they must avoid contributing to further bloodshed and suffering by exploiting genuine grievances for their own purposes. The easiest exit would be the one that preserves stability rather than exacerbates instability.