The Democrats' Problem: A Generational Identity Crisis
As Hollywood actor Brian Cox so aptly put it, the Democratic Party's consultant class is comprised of "second sons" - or at least those who resemble second sons. These upper-middle-class scions have attended the right schools, schmoozed at the right parties, and waited their turns for a moment in the spotlight. Their tactics reflect a supposed meritocracy, with an emphasis on credentials and painting their candidates as inevitables.
In contrast, Donald Trump's rise to power was rooted in his uncouth reality-TV persona, which allowed him to tap into America's frustrations and paint himself as a truth-teller. While Trump's approach may have been unorthodox, it resonated with his audience in a way that the Democratic Party's more diplomatic rhetoric has not.
The Democratic Party's response to its 2024 defeat was characterized by a defensive "Any Given Tuesday" mentality, marveling at the median voter and promising to do better next time. However, this approach feels like a cop-out, particularly given the recent release of emails that implicated Trump in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring.
The fact that these emails were withheld from the public for four years by Joe Biden's Department of Justice is a damning indictment of the Democratic Party's priorities. By failing to take decisive action against Trump's movement, Democrats allowed him to co-opt the conspiracist right and ultimately lose re-election.
So what's holding back the Democrats? For one, their consultants are too afraid to take a hard line against Trump's nationalist rhetoric. They're still living in the afterglow of President Barack Obama's dominant campaigns, unwilling to admit that sometimes going low is necessary to counter an opponent who will go low and lower.
As Cox so famously put it, "I love you," but you are not serious people. The Democratic Party needs to confront its own identity crisis and start taking bold action against its enemies - or risk being left in the dust by a populist upstart like Trump.
As Hollywood actor Brian Cox so aptly put it, the Democratic Party's consultant class is comprised of "second sons" - or at least those who resemble second sons. These upper-middle-class scions have attended the right schools, schmoozed at the right parties, and waited their turns for a moment in the spotlight. Their tactics reflect a supposed meritocracy, with an emphasis on credentials and painting their candidates as inevitables.
In contrast, Donald Trump's rise to power was rooted in his uncouth reality-TV persona, which allowed him to tap into America's frustrations and paint himself as a truth-teller. While Trump's approach may have been unorthodox, it resonated with his audience in a way that the Democratic Party's more diplomatic rhetoric has not.
The Democratic Party's response to its 2024 defeat was characterized by a defensive "Any Given Tuesday" mentality, marveling at the median voter and promising to do better next time. However, this approach feels like a cop-out, particularly given the recent release of emails that implicated Trump in Jeffrey Epstein's sex trafficking ring.
The fact that these emails were withheld from the public for four years by Joe Biden's Department of Justice is a damning indictment of the Democratic Party's priorities. By failing to take decisive action against Trump's movement, Democrats allowed him to co-opt the conspiracist right and ultimately lose re-election.
So what's holding back the Democrats? For one, their consultants are too afraid to take a hard line against Trump's nationalist rhetoric. They're still living in the afterglow of President Barack Obama's dominant campaigns, unwilling to admit that sometimes going low is necessary to counter an opponent who will go low and lower.
As Cox so famously put it, "I love you," but you are not serious people. The Democratic Party needs to confront its own identity crisis and start taking bold action against its enemies - or risk being left in the dust by a populist upstart like Trump.