The Erosion of Dissent: A Cautionary Tale from Hungary
Lydia Gall's expose on the UK's increasingly repressive protest laws echoes a disturbing trend in Viktor Orbán's Hungary. As a journalist who witnessed firsthand the steady erosion of democracy in Budapest, she warns that the UK is heading down a perilous path.
The UK's Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and Public Order Act 2023 have granted police sweeping powers to restrict demonstrations, criminalise peaceful tactics, and arrest individuals on vague grounds. The results are alarming: hundreds of arrests, fines, and lengthy imprisonments for peaceful protest activities. The chilling effect of these laws is palpable, with protesters and legal observers describing confusion about what is lawful, inconsistent police instructions, and arbitrary arrests.
This pattern is all too familiar in Hungary, where authoritarianism has taken root through the consolidation of government power. Under the guise of preserving "order" and "safety," the government has restricted public gatherings and silenced critical voices. Independent institutions have been undermined or taken over, ensuring that state power extends into nearly every corner of public life.
The Hungarian experience serves as a stark warning to the UK: when legal safeguards erode, and vague legislation hands discretion to the executive or police, the door opens to abuse. The high court's ruling on Suella Braverman's attempt to lower the protest threshold from "serious" to "more than minor" disruption is particularly troubling, as it signals a deep-seated instinct to control dissent across party lines.
The UK's creeping expansion of state power has extended far beyond the streets. The proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation has conflated civil disobedience with extremism, echoing authoritarian tactics to stifle opposition under the guise of security.
Laws outlast governments, and the UK is not immune to this reality. The lesson from Hungary is clear: once governments manipulate the law for political ends, it can be challenging to undo that damage. The UK authorities must take immediate action to repeal or amend the most repressive elements of recent protest laws, commit to transparency and accountability, and recognise that dissent – no matter how disruptive or uncomfortable – is a safeguard of democracy.
Freedom of assembly is not a gift governments grant their citizens; it is a right that protects citizens from their governments. Britain should take heed of this warning and ensure that its democratic institutions remain strong and resilient in the face of repressive measures. The future of dissent and the rule of law depend on it.
Lydia Gall's expose on the UK's increasingly repressive protest laws echoes a disturbing trend in Viktor Orbán's Hungary. As a journalist who witnessed firsthand the steady erosion of democracy in Budapest, she warns that the UK is heading down a perilous path.
The UK's Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and Public Order Act 2023 have granted police sweeping powers to restrict demonstrations, criminalise peaceful tactics, and arrest individuals on vague grounds. The results are alarming: hundreds of arrests, fines, and lengthy imprisonments for peaceful protest activities. The chilling effect of these laws is palpable, with protesters and legal observers describing confusion about what is lawful, inconsistent police instructions, and arbitrary arrests.
This pattern is all too familiar in Hungary, where authoritarianism has taken root through the consolidation of government power. Under the guise of preserving "order" and "safety," the government has restricted public gatherings and silenced critical voices. Independent institutions have been undermined or taken over, ensuring that state power extends into nearly every corner of public life.
The Hungarian experience serves as a stark warning to the UK: when legal safeguards erode, and vague legislation hands discretion to the executive or police, the door opens to abuse. The high court's ruling on Suella Braverman's attempt to lower the protest threshold from "serious" to "more than minor" disruption is particularly troubling, as it signals a deep-seated instinct to control dissent across party lines.
The UK's creeping expansion of state power has extended far beyond the streets. The proscription of Palestine Action as a terrorist organisation has conflated civil disobedience with extremism, echoing authoritarian tactics to stifle opposition under the guise of security.
Laws outlast governments, and the UK is not immune to this reality. The lesson from Hungary is clear: once governments manipulate the law for political ends, it can be challenging to undo that damage. The UK authorities must take immediate action to repeal or amend the most repressive elements of recent protest laws, commit to transparency and accountability, and recognise that dissent – no matter how disruptive or uncomfortable – is a safeguard of democracy.
Freedom of assembly is not a gift governments grant their citizens; it is a right that protects citizens from their governments. Britain should take heed of this warning and ensure that its democratic institutions remain strong and resilient in the face of repressive measures. The future of dissent and the rule of law depend on it.