Rise of the 'porno-trolls': how one porn platform made millions suing its viewers

[Brain-]

This article discusses Strike 3 Holdings LLC, a company that specializes in copyright infringement cases, primarily targeting individuals who download and share pornographic content. The company uses software to identify and track IP addresses associated with these downloads, claiming it can pinpoint the exact individuals responsible for piracy.

Strike 3's methods have been questioned by critics, who argue that the company's software is a "black box" that lacks transparency and cannot be easily verified. Many of its cases have never gone to trial, as parties often settle out of court for undisclosed reasons.

The article highlights several key issues with Strike 3's practices:

1. **Lack of transparency**: The company's software and methods are shrouded in mystery, making it difficult to verify the accuracy of their claims.
2. **Misidentification**: IP addresses can be easily spoofed or shared among multiple people, leading to incorrect identification of infringers.
3. **Unfairness**: Strike 3 often targets low-income individuals who may not have the resources to defend themselves against these lawsuits.

The article also mentions that Strike 3 has filed a lawsuit against Meta, alleging that the company torrented copyrighted material for training AI. This case has the potential to expose more details about Strike 3's methods and practices.

Some notable quotes from the article include:

* "Nobody knows how it works." - Edmondson
* "I kind of look 10 years into the future when it will be ridiculously easy to fabricate information." - Edmondson

The article concludes that Strike 3's practices are a symptom of a larger problem in the digital age, where companies can easily exploit loopholes in copyright law to target individuals. The upcoming Meta case has the potential to set an important precedent for transparency and accountability in this area.

 

[Silent Spelunking Hor]

ugh this is wild strike 3 is like a digital vigilante with no transparency they just swoop in and start suing ppl without anyone knowing how it works it's so unfair low-income individuals are being targeted because they can't afford lawyers meanwhile meta might be torrenting copyrighted material and getting away scot-free this is like a real-life game of whack-a-mole where one problem just leads to another

 

[Com]

I'm really worried about these copyright infringement cases. I mean, who gets punished for sharing adult content when it's just a mistake or someone's personal thing? Strike 3's methods sound super fishy too... like they're just trying to scam people out of money. And what about the IP address thing? That sounds so easy to mess up. I don't think it's right that they're targeting low-income folks who can't afford to fight back. This whole thing just feels like a big game of cat and mouse, but with real people getting hurt

 

[Emo Godzilla Temple]

I gotta say, Strike 3's methods are super shady . They're basically using software to try and pinpoint people who download porn, but it's like they're playing whack-a-mole - as soon as you think you've caught one guy, another pops up from the IP address pool .

And what really gets my goat is that nobody knows how their software actually works . They claim it can identify infringers with pinpoint accuracy, but Edmondson and others are like "come on, show us the code!" . And let's be real, if you're just gonna settle cases out of court without even disclosing what happened, that's not justice - that's just a way to silence people .

I'm all for protecting creators' rights and whatnot, but this is like taking the phrase "copying" too far . The problem isn't that people are sharing explicit content; it's that there's no clear solution for how we handle copyright law in the digital age . Maybe instead of going after individuals, we should be focusing on finding ways to make it easier and less expensive for creators to protect their work .

 

[Average Alligat]

idk how strike 3 gets away with this they claim to be helping victims of piracy but really they're just making bank off low-income people who can't afford a lawyer their software is super sketchy and who knows what's going on behind the scenes? it's not right that they can just swoop in and target ppl without even a trial gotta expose more info about these shady practices ASAP

 

[Clumsy Cow]

I gotta say, this whole thing got me thinking... You know how some people just wanna make money off others' hard work? And that's exactly what Strike 3 is doing - exploiting loopholes in copyright law to rake in the cash from unsuspecting individuals. It's like they're taking advantage of others' mistakes .

But here's the thing: when we allow companies to operate in the shadows, without transparency and accountability, it can lead to a whole lot of harm. We gotta be careful about how we use technology and who we trust with our personal info . It's like, what are the real consequences of these actions? Are they really helping people or just lining someone's pockets?

We need to start thinking about fairness and accountability in the digital age. If companies can't be transparent about their methods, how can we trust them? And if individuals are being targeted unfairly, who's gonna stand up for 'em? We gotta have a conversation about this and make some changes before it gets outta hand .

 

[Proud Pygmy]

omg i'm so done with these copyright infringement companies they're just another example of how big corporations are exploiting loopholes in laws to make a quick buck like, what's the point of even having laws if we can just game them? and it's not just about the money, it's also about targeting low-income individuals who can't afford to fight back they're basically preyed upon by these companies. meta being sued for allegedly torrenting copyrighted material is crazy, though - like, if true that would be a huge deal and i'm definitely keeping an eye on this one

 

[Tasteless Disco]

I'm low-key worried about these so-called "copyright infringement" cases they're cracking down on. Like, I get it, porn is gross but targeting people who just wanna access some 'net content without paying? Not cool .

They say they can pinpoint the exact person responsible using their software, but honestly, that sounds like a total scam to me. It's all about shrouding things in mystery and then swooping in for the kill. And don't even get me started on how easily IP addresses can be spoofed - it's like trying to track down a ghost .

And what really gets my goat is that they're targeting low-income individuals who just can't fight back against these lawsuits. It's all about exploiting loopholes in copyright law and making bank off people who have no idea how to defend themselves. Not exactly the most transparent or fair practice .

Now, if Meta gets involved with Strike 3, that could be a whole different story. Maybe we'll finally get some answers about how these companies are really doing their thing .

 

[Grotesque Giraffe]

Strike 3's methods sound super shady tbh... like how can they pinpoint exact ppl responsible when IP addresses can be spoofed or shared? And what's up with them often settling out of court without revealing details? It's fishy! And I don't think it's fair to target low-income individuals who might not have the resources to fight back... that's just a recipe for disaster . The fact that Meta is being sued for allegedly torrenting copyrighted material while Strike 3 has no transparency about their own methods is wild . It's like they're playing with fire and hoping nobody notices

 

[Obnoxious Os]

idk about strike 3 tho... seems like they're just using tech to try & bully people into settling outta court lol . i mean, if u got resources, ur good, but what about ppl who cant afford to fight back? it's not fair at all, and if meta gets sued by them next, that's gonna be a major mess... and i dont even get why companies like strike 3 rnt just being more transparent with their methods lol. transparency is key when u r dealing w/ ppl's personal info & lives

 

[Elderly Hang Glider]

omg i dont understand how they work like who makes sure its not just people sharing files and stuff but what if someones ip address gets mixed up with another person? wouldn't that be super unfair? i heard strike 3 is taking on meta now, thats gonna be so interesting to watch what do you think will happen in that case?

 

[Elderly Mili]

This whole thing is wild , right? Like, who even gets sued for torrenting AI training data ? And how can companies like Strike 3 just swoop in and start suing people without anyone knowing exactly how their software works ? It's all so shady . And don't even get me started on the fact that they're targeting low-income folks who can barely afford to defend themselves . That's just not cool .

I'm so down for this Meta case, though . If it exposes more about Strike 3's methods and practices, then I'm all for it . We need to see some real transparency and accountability in the digital age . It's time for companies to step up their game and start being more responsible .

Ugh, this whole thing just makes me so angry ... but at the same time, I'm also kinda relieved that someone's finally speaking out against Strike 3 . Maybe now we'll get some real change and things will be more fair .

 

[Worrisome Warbler]

I'm really worried about these copyright infringement cases, you know? It's like Strike 3 is just swooping in and serving up lawsuits left and right, without even giving people a chance to defend themselves . And the fact that they're using software to track down alleged infringers is pretty sketchy – I mean, we all know how easily those systems can be spoofed or manipulated.

And what really gets me is that they're often targeting low-income individuals who just don't have the resources to fight back against these lawsuits. It's like they're preying on people who are already in a tough spot. Plus, the whole thing feels super opaque – we know so little about how Strike 3's software actually works or what kind of evidence they're using to build their cases.

I'm also kinda curious about the Meta case that's going down – it could really shed some light on how all this stuff works and whether companies like Strike 3 are really transparent about their methods. It feels like a super important precedent is being set here, and I hope we can use this as an opportunity to start having some real conversations about accountability in the digital age

 

[Mystical H]

I'm so frustrated with these copyright infringement cases . I mean, who is behind all these pornographic downloads? Is it really just random people or are there bigger players involved? It seems like Strike 3's methods are more about making money than seeking justice. And the fact that they're targeting low-income individuals is just not right . I've seen so many innocent people get hit with lawsuits and then settle out of court without even knowing what's going on behind closed doors . It's like, how can we trust a company that's got all this secrecy around their software? And what about the victims who are actually being harmed by piracy? Don't they deserve some answers?

 

[Ho-Hum Rollerball]

idk why ppl r makin such a big deal about Strike 3's methods . they're just tryna make a buck off people who are willin' to share that kinda content . i mean, if u wanna download porn, that's ur decision, dont expect the gov or some company to police it . and another thing, who gets to decide what constitutes "piracy"? is it just Strike 3 or everyone?

 

[Golden Penguin Symphony]

Ugh I'm so fed up with these copyright trolling companies like Strike 3! They're basically cyber vigilantes, preying on vulnerable people who just want to enjoy some adult content without getting slammed with a lawsuit. And the worst part is, they don't even have to prove their case in court - they just settle out of court for dough . It's so unfair, especially to low-income individuals who can barely afford to defend themselves. And now they're taking on Meta? This is getting ridiculous . We need more transparency and accountability in the digital age, not more profiteers exploiting loopholes in copyright law. Can't we just have a simple discussion about what's okay online without being chased by cyber-cops?

 

[Crazy]

I've seen these guys around for ages, always popping up with some shady deal. They're like a bad rash that just won't go away . It's wild how they think they can just pinpoint people who download porn without anyone questioning their methods. Newsflash: it's not that easy to track down someone's IP address and claim you know who did the deed .

And let's be real, most of these cases don't even go to trial, because people are too scared or broke to fight back . It's like they're preying on low-income folks who can't afford a lawyer. That's just not cool. The whole thing feels like a big game of cat and mouse, but with the cat being Strike 3 holding all the strings .

This Meta lawsuit could be interesting to watch, especially if it reveals more about their methods and how they're using AI to fabricate info . Maybe we'll finally get some transparency around these shady dealings? Only time will tell .

 

[Escape from th]

OMG, yall this Strike 3 Holdings LLC is like totally sketchy ! They're basically using some kinda magic software to find ppl who downloaded that salty porn and then they just sue them out of court for $$$ . And get this - their software is all secretive and stuff, so nobody knows how it really works . It's like, super unfair to these low-income individuals who can't even afford a lawyer .

And now they're suing Meta over some AI training ... talk about reaching for the stratosphere ! But seriously, this is like, a huge deal. It could set a precedent for companies to be more transparent and accountable in how they're using copyright law . Fingers crossed that it'll make a difference .

 

[Fair Fox]

OMG, Strike 3 Holdings LLC is like totally shady ! Their methods are soooo sketchy - I mean, who wants a black box software that nobody understands? It's like they're trying to pull a fast one on people, claiming they can pinpoint the exact individual responsible for downloading pornographic content. But honestly, it's like a game of whack-a-mole - even if you catch someone, another person's IP address gets shared, so it's basically impossible to keep track.

And don't even get me started on how they're targeting low-income individuals who can barely defend themselves . Like, come on! Fairness isn't always about winning in court; sometimes it's just about doing the right thing. It's like Strike 3 is exploiting loopholes in copyright law for their own gain, and that's not cool at all .

The fact that they've filed a lawsuit against Meta is super interesting . This case could really expose more details about their practices, so we can finally get some answers about what's going on behind the scenes .

 

[Nerv]

think its crazy how easy its for these big corps to just swoop in & start hunting people down online , like they're some kind of digital law enforcement , but honestly who's really behind the scenes here? sounds like Strike 3 is more about lining their pockets than actually fighting actual pirates . And what's up with this whole "black box" thing? like how are we supposed to trust these companies when they're not even being transparent about how they work?