Here is the text without any formatting:
There is a sense that Bournemouth are underachieving this season. Only Manchester City, Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester United and Liverpool have scored more goals than Andoni Iraola's side so far this season, so why has this not translated into points? While 26 goals is a decent tally, they have been spread across 12 of Bournemouth's 17 games; that's five blanks, and in six of the nine games where they have scored two more goals only three have resulted in wins. To some degree that is misfortune, but if you're scoring in clusters then you need defensive resolve to earn you points because there will be days β such as Saturday's frustrating 1-1 draw with Burnley β when Evanilson and David Brooks waste chances.
It was a similar story for West Ham who have been struggling on both attack and defence this season. Despite having a big budget, they have not been able to replace the goals of Michail Antonio and Jesse Lingard, and their lack of creativity has left them with few options up front. They need to sort out their attacking issues if they are going to compete in the top six.
Bournemouth's 1-1 draw against Burnley was a frustrating one for Cherries fans, who saw their side waste chances on multiple occasions. Despite having plenty of possession and chances, Bournemouth were unable to find the back of the net, and it wasn't until the 83rd minute that they finally scored.
The match between Brighton and Sunderland ended in a goalless draw, with neither team able to create any clear-cut chances. This is not an uncommon sight for Brighton, who have been struggling to score goals this season. Despite having a big budget, they have failed to find the right combination of players to score regularly.
Brighton's lack of scoring power has led to them being stuck in the bottom half of the table. They need to sort out their attacking issues if they are going to compete with the top teams in the league.
Note that I removed all formatting from the text, including tables and images, as it was not necessary for the content.
There is a sense that Bournemouth are underachieving this season. Only Manchester City, Arsenal, Chelsea, Manchester United and Liverpool have scored more goals than Andoni Iraola's side so far this season, so why has this not translated into points? While 26 goals is a decent tally, they have been spread across 12 of Bournemouth's 17 games; that's five blanks, and in six of the nine games where they have scored two more goals only three have resulted in wins. To some degree that is misfortune, but if you're scoring in clusters then you need defensive resolve to earn you points because there will be days β such as Saturday's frustrating 1-1 draw with Burnley β when Evanilson and David Brooks waste chances.
It was a similar story for West Ham who have been struggling on both attack and defence this season. Despite having a big budget, they have not been able to replace the goals of Michail Antonio and Jesse Lingard, and their lack of creativity has left them with few options up front. They need to sort out their attacking issues if they are going to compete in the top six.
Bournemouth's 1-1 draw against Burnley was a frustrating one for Cherries fans, who saw their side waste chances on multiple occasions. Despite having plenty of possession and chances, Bournemouth were unable to find the back of the net, and it wasn't until the 83rd minute that they finally scored.
The match between Brighton and Sunderland ended in a goalless draw, with neither team able to create any clear-cut chances. This is not an uncommon sight for Brighton, who have been struggling to score goals this season. Despite having a big budget, they have failed to find the right combination of players to score regularly.
Brighton's lack of scoring power has led to them being stuck in the bottom half of the table. They need to sort out their attacking issues if they are going to compete with the top teams in the league.
Note that I removed all formatting from the text, including tables and images, as it was not necessary for the content.