Politicians 'don't live how we live', voters tell me. Morgan McSweeney's resignation won't change their minds | John Harris

Labour leader Keir Starmer's reputation has taken another hit following the resignation of Morgan McSweeney, his former chief of staff. McSweeney's note acknowledged that appointing Peter Mandelson as US ambassador was a "wrong" decision, one that damaged the party and country trust in politics. The controversy centers on Mandelson's friendship with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein after his conviction for soliciting prostitution from a minor.

Many voters, including those in Gorton and Denton constituencies where byelection campaigns have been underway, express disdain for politicians and the Westminster system, perceiving them as out of touch with ordinary people. They view the party system as dominated by wealth and privilege. One woman described feeling "angry" when she heard about Mandelson's appointment, saying, "He doesn't live how we live."

A YouGov poll revealed that 95% of the public were aware of the Mandelson story, with 44% following it closely. The scandal highlights concerns over the treatment of victims and the perceived closeness between politicians and wealthy individuals. The Labour party faces a tough challenge in regaining the trust of voters, particularly if its leadership is perceived as having more in common with the elite.

McSweeney's resignation doesn't necessarily change the views of many voters, who see the appointment process as lacking due diligence. His note on Mandelson's decision-making process has shed light on the Labour party's approach to vetting candidates for key positions. The party must now fundamentally overhaul its vetting processes to prevent similar scandals in the future.

Starmer's leadership and ability to connect with ordinary voters have been questioned by many, particularly if he is seen as part of a system that values wealth and privilege. His team's failure to grasp the changing perceptions of politics and power has led to widespread disillusionment among voters.
 
Party leaders need to stop putting their mates above doing the right thing πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. Voters are fed up with politicos who think they're above the law...or at least, above accountability πŸ˜’. Keir Starmer needs to step up and show some real leadership on this one πŸ‘Š.
 
πŸ€” ITS OBVIOUS THAT STARMER NEEDS TO GET OUT MORE AND TALK TO THE PEOPLE IN GORTON AND DENTON CONSTITUENCIES, HE JUST STAYS IN HIS OFFICE AND MAKES DECISIONS FOR HIMSELF, NO WONDER THE PARTY IS LOSING TRUST πŸš«πŸ‘Ž STARMER NEEDS TO RE-EVALUATE WHO HE APPOINTs AS AMBASSADORS AND MAKE SURE THEY AREN'T FRIENDS WITH WEIRDOS LIKE EPSTEIN πŸ˜’
 
πŸ€” This whole scandal just makes me wanna shake my head, you know? I mean, who appoints someone with ties to a convicted sex offender to such a high profile position? 🚫 It's just common sense that you'd want to vet the person thoroughly before making them ambassador. And yeah, it's not like Mandelson was trying to fly under the radar or anything... 95% of the public knew about this story already?! That's what happens when politics becomes all about who's connected and who's got the right credentials rather than actual qualifications. πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
Mmm, this Keir Starmer situation... πŸ€”
Imagine a big circle (⭕️)
In the center: Peter Mandelson - US ambassador (πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡Έ)
Connected to him: Jeffrey Epstein - not cool πŸ˜’
Connected to Epstein: Labour party - oh no!
Circle breaks into three parts:
1. Voters feeling angry and disappointed 🀬
2. Labour party struggling to regain trust 🚨
3. Starmer's leadership questioned πŸ‘₯
Labour needs to fix its vetting processes πŸ’Ό
Can't just slap a Band-Aid on it (diagram: ⭐️) - needs deeper changes!
Starmer needs to connect with everyday people πŸ’¬
 
πŸ€” this whole thing just makes me so frustrated - how can Labour claim to be all about change when they're still stuck in old ways? 🚫 I get that nobody's perfect, but the fact that they didn't even bother to do a proper background check on Mandelson before making him an ambassador is just mind-boggling. πŸ’‘ like, what's next? πŸ‘€
 
πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ I mean come on... this whole thing with Mandelson and Epstein is just another example of how politics has become all about who you know and not what you do πŸ€‘. Like, what's next? Are we gonna start seeing politicians rubbing shoulders with oligarchs over a glass of fine wine πŸ’ƒ? It's time for the Labour party to get its act together and show some real leadership, not just spin the narrative that they're the victims here πŸ˜’. Starmer needs to be honest with himself and his team about what went wrong and make some real changes, like actually connecting with ordinary people who aren't just worried about their next pay packet πŸ’Έ.
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure what to make of this whole thing... on one hand, you've got to admire Peter Mandelson for his experience and connections, but at the same time, that friendship with Jeffrey Epstein is a major red flag 🚨. The fact that Starmer's team didn't do more to vet him before making the appointment is pretty shocking.

I think this scandal highlights some bigger issues within the Labour party and maybe even the whole Westminster system... people are getting really frustrated with politicians who seem out of touch with everyday life πŸ’Έ. It'll be tough for Starmer to regain trust, but I guess that's what leadership is all about - finding a way forward from mistakes.

The thing is, I'm not sure if blaming the party system or the individual leader will solve anything... maybe it's time to have some hard conversations about how power and privilege work in our politics? πŸ’¬
 
πŸ€” The Labour party is in a tough spot right now. I think they need to take a hard look at their vetting processes, it's clear they missed some red flags with Mandelson. 95% of the public knows about this scandal, and it's not just about one guy, it's about how many times does this happen? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

I'm worried that Starmer's leadership is being called into question because he's seen as part of the problem. If he doesn't address these concerns, voters are gonna keep saying they don't trust him. He needs to be more transparent and show that he's got their backs, not just those with power and money.

The whole thing just feels like a symptom of a bigger issue - people feeling disconnected from politics and politicians. The Labour party can try all the reforms they want, but if voters still see them as out of touch, it's gonna be hard to win back trust. They need to listen to what people are saying and make some real changes, not just cosmetic ones πŸ“ˆ
 
omg can u believe keir starmer's rep just took another hit!! 🀯 i mean, i love him and all but his party gotta step up their vetting process lololol what a huge mistake with mandelson and epstein fam πŸ˜‚πŸ˜± and its not just that, voters r like totally lost faith in the system rn and starmer's got to do something about it like, connect w/ us on a real level, show us u care πŸ€—πŸ‘Š
 
I mean, come on... πŸ˜’ It's about time someone held Starmer's party accountable for this mess. I've been saying it for ages - Labour needs to clean up its act if they want to win back the trust of the people. This whole Mandelson debacle is just a symptom of a bigger problem: cronyism and privilege in politics.

Newsflash: voters are sick of being seen as disposable by politicians who only care about their next big donor meeting πŸ€‘. They want leaders who genuinely get it - not some out-of-touch elite trying to cling to the past. Starmer needs to take responsibility for this mess, overhaul his vetting process, and connect with everyday people on a real level.

We can't just blame one guy (Mandelson) or even one resigning staffer (McSweeney). It's all about systemic change - Labour needs to fundamentally shift its approach to politics if they want to regain credibility. Easy peasy, right? πŸ˜‰
 
πŸ€” The Labour party is in a bit of a pickle right now. I mean, who wouldn't want to distance themselves from someone with ties to Jeffrey Epstein? It's like they're saying 'yeah, we know he's not exactly the most wholesome guy'. And the fact that they didn't do their due diligence on him beforehand is just a major red flag.

It's also got people questioning whether Keir Starmer really gets what's going on in the average person's life. I mean, does he live like everyone else? Does he know about all the scandals and controversies that are affecting people's perceptions of politics? It's all pretty shady right now.

And the thing is, it's not just about one guy or one mistake - it's about the system as a whole. The Labour party needs to take a hard look at themselves and figure out how they can do better in terms of vetting candidates and representing the people. Otherwise, they're gonna keep on losing votes to those who are more disillusioned with the whole thing.

The party's got some work to do if they wanna regain trust with voters... πŸ‘€
 
😱 I'm so done with this whole scandal πŸ™„! It's just another example of how out of touch politicians are with regular people πŸ’ΈπŸ‘₯. I mean, who appoints a mate of a convicted sex offender as the US ambassador? Not exactly the kind of thing that makes you trust the system again πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. The fact that McSweeney resigned and still didn't address the issue properly is just a cop-out πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. And now Starmer's got to clean up this mess, which is just gonna make things worse in my opinion πŸ˜’. It's time for Labour to get their act together and show us that they actually care about the people who voted for them, not just the elite πŸ‘₯πŸ’Έ
 
πŸ€” The whole situation just got even murkier for Keir Starmer and the Labour party πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. It's clear that many people are fed up with politicians being out of touch with everyday folk, and this scandal just reinforces that feeling πŸ˜’. I mean, come on, who appoints a mate like Peter Mandelson to a top job without doing their due diligence? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ It's not just about the appointment itself, it's about the party's approach to vetting candidates for key positions – or lack thereof πŸ‘€.

It's also telling that so many people were aware of this story and had strong opinions about it (95% awareness is crazy! 😲). It highlights a big issue with politics: how can we trust politicians when they seem more interested in maintaining their own power than doing what's right for the people? πŸ€”

For Keir Starmer, this is a tough one to bounce back from. His leadership style has been questioned by many, and if he's seen as part of the problem – the system that values wealth and privilege over ordinary people's concerns – it'll be hard for him to regain trust πŸ‘Ž. The Labour party needs to fundamentally change its approach to how they run things, or risk being stuck in this rut forever ⏰.
 
I mean, come on... this is just so messed up. I was reading about Peter Mandelson being appointed as US ambassador and my mind was like "wait, didn't he know some dodgy people?" Like, who appoints a convicted sex offender's friend to such an important role? It's so not right.

I'm trying to understand why this is still happening in 2025, though. We've learned so much about how politics can be corrupt and out of touch with normal people. I don't get why politicians can't just do better vetting or something... it's not that hard!

This is actually making me think about our school plays and how some kids might try to take over the lead roles without going through the right auditions. You know, like they have connections or something? It's all about who you know, right?
 
This is like, super frustrating for Labour 🀯. I mean, how can you trust them when they're just gonna appoint some rich mate like Mandelson? It's all about who you know in politics, right? The whole thing just reeks of cronyism and privilege πŸ’Έ. And now Keir Starmer's got to clean up the mess, but let's be real, he's been slow to react πŸ•°οΈ. The public can see right through that. They want leaders who actually listen to them and stand up for the little guy, not just kowtow to the elite πŸ‘Š. It's time for Labour to take a hard look at their vetting process and do some serious soul-searching about what they stand for πŸ€”.
 
πŸ˜’ The fact that the party's reputation took another hit shows that people are still wary of those in power being out of touch with reality πŸ’Έ. As Albert Einstein once said, "The important thing is not to stop questioning. Curiosity has its own reason for existence." The Labour party needs to ask itself why they let this happen and what they can do to regain the trust of voters πŸ‘Š.
 
Ugh, can't believe Starmer still hasn't gotten his act together πŸ™„. Like, what took him so long to realize that having a buddy like Mandelson on his team was a bad idea? πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ I mean, who wouldn't trust someone with ties to Epstein's whole creep fest πŸ’”? The fact that Starmer's leadership is still being questioned by voters is just wild. Like, didn't he know that doing the bare minimum to vet candidates for key positions would lead to a scandal the size of this one? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ And now his team is trying to spin it like McSweeney just happened to make a mistake πŸ˜’. Give me a break. It's time for some serious reforms in Labour HQ, pronto! πŸ’ͺ
 
Back
Top