OpenAI is "hoppin' mad" over Anthropic's new Super Bowl TV ads, which the AI lab claims are an attempt to mock and discredit its own plans for introducing advertisements into chatbot conversations. The ads, featuring a single word splashed across the screen followed by a scenario where a person asks a human stand-in for an AI chatbot for personal advice, only to get blindsided by a product pitch, have sparked a heated response from OpenAI's CEO Sam Altman and Chief Marketing Officer Kate Rouch.
Altman has called Anthropic's ads "clearly dishonest" and accused the company of being "authoritarian," suggesting that they are trying to control access to AI technology. He has also claimed that OpenAI is not stupid enough to run ads in a way that would alienate its users, and that Anthropic's approach is an overreach.
Rouch has responded by calling the ads "funny" but pivoting quickly to criticize Anthropic for wanting to tightly control powerful AI technology. However, she did acknowledge that her own company's stance on advertising could be seen as heavy-handed.
Meanwhile, OpenAI President Greg Brockman has pointed out that Anthropic's blog post about its ad plans makes it sound like the company is keeping the option open to sell users' attention or data to advertisers, which Brockman finds troubling.
The rivalry between OpenAI and Anthropic is particularly heated because several OpenAI employees left the company to found Anthropic in 2021. Anthropic's Claude code has managed to pull off a market upset by becoming a favorite among some software developers despite being smaller than OpenAI in terms of overall market share.
It appears that the financial backdrop of these companies plays a role in their disagreement over advertising, as OpenAI is reportedly burning through $9 billion this year while generating about $13 billion in revenue. Anthropic, on the other hand, relies more on enterprise contracts and paid subscriptions rather than advertising and has not taken on infrastructure commitments at the same scale as OpenAI.
The dispute between these two AI labs highlights a larger debate over access to AI technology and how it should be regulated. While some argue that companies like Anthropic are trying too hard to control access to powerful AI, others see them as necessary checks on the influence of tech giants like OpenAI.
Ultimately, it remains to be seen how this rivalry will play out in the future, but one thing is clear: both sides are determined to shape the course of AI history and ensure that their respective visions for the technology come to fruition.
Altman has called Anthropic's ads "clearly dishonest" and accused the company of being "authoritarian," suggesting that they are trying to control access to AI technology. He has also claimed that OpenAI is not stupid enough to run ads in a way that would alienate its users, and that Anthropic's approach is an overreach.
Rouch has responded by calling the ads "funny" but pivoting quickly to criticize Anthropic for wanting to tightly control powerful AI technology. However, she did acknowledge that her own company's stance on advertising could be seen as heavy-handed.
Meanwhile, OpenAI President Greg Brockman has pointed out that Anthropic's blog post about its ad plans makes it sound like the company is keeping the option open to sell users' attention or data to advertisers, which Brockman finds troubling.
The rivalry between OpenAI and Anthropic is particularly heated because several OpenAI employees left the company to found Anthropic in 2021. Anthropic's Claude code has managed to pull off a market upset by becoming a favorite among some software developers despite being smaller than OpenAI in terms of overall market share.
It appears that the financial backdrop of these companies plays a role in their disagreement over advertising, as OpenAI is reportedly burning through $9 billion this year while generating about $13 billion in revenue. Anthropic, on the other hand, relies more on enterprise contracts and paid subscriptions rather than advertising and has not taken on infrastructure commitments at the same scale as OpenAI.
The dispute between these two AI labs highlights a larger debate over access to AI technology and how it should be regulated. While some argue that companies like Anthropic are trying too hard to control access to powerful AI, others see them as necessary checks on the influence of tech giants like OpenAI.
Ultimately, it remains to be seen how this rivalry will play out in the future, but one thing is clear: both sides are determined to shape the course of AI history and ensure that their respective visions for the technology come to fruition.
anthropic's "clearly dishonest" vibes r giving me life lol meanwhile openai's trying to sound like the good cop 
but sam altman is still being extra salty about it 
the whole thing just feels like a big game of corporate espionage 
but idk if anthropic's approach is that bad tbh maybe they're just trying to protect users from getting sold out 
anyway this rivalry is making me excited for ai history in the making 
what if they're just trying to prepare for when ads become a thing in chatbots? openai sounds kinda defensive here... maybe they should focus on developing their own ad solutions instead of criticizing anthropic 
! Like, can't they just focus on making AI more accessible and beneficial for humanity? OpenAI and Anthropic are both trying to promote their own agendas, but it's getting ugly 
. I think what really bothers me is that it's all about control and profit 
. Instead of working together to create positive change, they're fighting over who gets to dictate the terms of AI development.
. We're already seeing so many issues with AI bias, misinformation, and exploitation – do we really need more companies trying to cash in on it? 
. Can't we just focus on promoting kindness, empathy, and self-awareness instead of competing over AI dominance? 
I gotta say, these two big players in the AI space are like rivals on a super intense sports league 
. It's all about who gets to dictate how AI is used and controlled. I'm kinda torn on this one - part of me thinks OpenAI should just chill with advertising since it's not hurting anyone 
, but at the same time, I can see why Anthropic would wanna keep a close eye on things, especially if they think it'll help prevent some AI missteps 
. Either way, I'm excited (and a bit anxious 
) to see how this all plays out in the future! 
I mean, if you can't take a joke, that's not the internet. But at the same time, I do get why Anthropic's being careful with how they approach AI tech - all this money and power is a big responsibility! 
. They were trying to poke fun at OpenAI's plans to sell user data to advertisers, which is definitely a gray area 
.
. The fact that they're managing to pull off market upsets despite being smaller than OpenAI is definitely worth noting 
.
.
. Give me a break! I mean, I get it, both companies wanna make money, but can't they just agree on something that doesn't involve alienating users or feelin' the need to control everything? And what's with these ads being super short and to the point? It's like they're tryin' to be funny or somethin', but all I'm seein' is a bunch of hype 
.
. and now anthropic is being all defensive about it... meanwhile, we're left with no real clarity on what either company's goals actually are.
the real question is: who gets to decide how we interact with AI? 
they're like the cool kids in town now 
. OpenAI thinks Anthropic's ads are low, but honestly, they seem pretty reasonable to me. It's all about bein' transparent with your users, you know? And let's be real, if someone's gonna try to sell their attention or data, that's not exactly a new thing... people have been doin' it for years 
. I mean, can you imagine what kind of damage they could be doing with all that cash if it wasn't being wasted on petty squabbles over advertising 
. I mean, who doesn't want some control over how their data gets used? It's not about being authoritarian, it's about making sure we don't end up with a Wild West of AI exploitation 
.
.