New York's Offshore Wind Project Breezes Back to Life After Trump-Imposed Halt
A US District Court ruling has granted a preliminary injunction, allowing Norwegian energy giant Equinor to resume construction on its Empire 1 offshore wind project, which had been put on hold by the Trump administration last year. The decision comes after Equinor filed a lawsuit against the US Department of the Interior over the halted project.
The stop work order issued by the Trump administration cited unspecified safety and national security concerns, but the government's motives remain unclear. In fact, the White House recently described wind energy as "the scam of the century," sparking widespread criticism from industry stakeholders and environmental advocates.
Despite this recent setback, Equinor has vowed to focus on safely restarting construction activities for the Empire 1 project, which was set to provide power next year with 54 turbines in the Atlantic Ocean. The New York attorney general's office had previously filed a lawsuit against the halt, labeling it "arbitrary and capricious."
The decision comes as two major offshore wind projects, Empire 1 and Sunrise, remain impacted by the halt. Equinor's lawsuit will proceed, while Orsted, which operates the Sunrise project, is seeking a preliminary injunction of its own.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has long been an outspoken critic of the Trump administration's actions on wind energy, calling them "designed to do nothing other than hurt workers, hurt our states, hurt our economy and hurt our energy future."
Industry experts say the halt poses significant risks to thousands of union workers employed by the two projects. Billions of private and public dollars are also at stake, as the construction and revitalization of local infrastructure such as ports in Staten Island and South Brooklyn hang in the balance.
While this latest development provides a temporary reprieve for Equinor's project, experts caution that more steps could be taken to disrupt or delay its completion. As one advocate noted, even an ultimate victory against the administration's freeze may not prevent further action from being taken.
A US District Court ruling has granted a preliminary injunction, allowing Norwegian energy giant Equinor to resume construction on its Empire 1 offshore wind project, which had been put on hold by the Trump administration last year. The decision comes after Equinor filed a lawsuit against the US Department of the Interior over the halted project.
The stop work order issued by the Trump administration cited unspecified safety and national security concerns, but the government's motives remain unclear. In fact, the White House recently described wind energy as "the scam of the century," sparking widespread criticism from industry stakeholders and environmental advocates.
Despite this recent setback, Equinor has vowed to focus on safely restarting construction activities for the Empire 1 project, which was set to provide power next year with 54 turbines in the Atlantic Ocean. The New York attorney general's office had previously filed a lawsuit against the halt, labeling it "arbitrary and capricious."
The decision comes as two major offshore wind projects, Empire 1 and Sunrise, remain impacted by the halt. Equinor's lawsuit will proceed, while Orsted, which operates the Sunrise project, is seeking a preliminary injunction of its own.
New York Governor Kathy Hochul has long been an outspoken critic of the Trump administration's actions on wind energy, calling them "designed to do nothing other than hurt workers, hurt our states, hurt our economy and hurt our energy future."
Industry experts say the halt poses significant risks to thousands of union workers employed by the two projects. Billions of private and public dollars are also at stake, as the construction and revitalization of local infrastructure such as ports in Staten Island and South Brooklyn hang in the balance.
While this latest development provides a temporary reprieve for Equinor's project, experts caution that more steps could be taken to disrupt or delay its completion. As one advocate noted, even an ultimate victory against the administration's freeze may not prevent further action from being taken.