Microsoft drops AI sales targets in half after salespeople miss their quotas

Microsoft has significantly scaled back its sales growth targets for AI agent products following a dismal performance by its salespeople in meeting their quarterly quotas. The move is seen as an unusual concession from the tech giant, which had previously touted AI agents as a key part of its future business strategy.

In May, Microsoft declared that it was entering "the era of AI agents," promising customers that these systems could automate complex tasks and improve productivity. However, sales figures suggest that enterprise customers are hesitant to invest in these technologies, at least for now.

The discrepancy between promise and reality is attributed to the fact that AI agent technology is not yet ready for high-stakes autonomous business work. The systems, which typically rely on parallel processing of "worker tasks" with a supervising model, can still be prone to errors and confabulate (generate false output).

Several factors contribute to this issue, including the limitations of current AI models, the need for extensive training data, and the potential for catastrophic mistakes. While looping agentic systems have improved in catching their own mistakes, they still inherit fundamental pattern-matching limitations.

Microsoft's decision to lower its sales growth targets follows a series of disappointing performance reports on its AI offerings. The company has faced challenges in selling its Copilot chatbot to enterprises, with many employees preferring OpenAI's ChatGPT instead.

Despite these struggles, Microsoft continues to invest heavily in AI infrastructure, with record-breaking capital expenditures reported in its fiscal first quarter ending in October. While the company remains committed to developing agentic worker systems, it appears to be building infrastructure for a future that many enterprises have yet to adopt.
 
πŸ€” So I'm reading this and Microsoft is basically saying "you know what? AI agents aren't as great as we thought they were" πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ. They're scaling back their sales growth targets because the salespeople can't even meet the quotas πŸ“Š. It's like, I get it, tech is hard, but come on! They had this whole "entering the era of AI agents" thing down pat πŸ’», but now they're not so sure πŸ€”. It makes sense that enterprises are hesitant to invest in these technologies, considering how prone they are to errors and whatnot 😳. I mean, who wants a system that's gonna give them wrong answers or make mistakes? Not me! πŸ’Έ I guess Microsoft is just being realistic now πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.
 
its kinda weird that microsoft was so optimistic about ai agents just last year πŸ€”πŸ“‰ they were like "ai is gonna revolutionize business" and now its "ok, we're scaling back our sales targets"... maybe they should've been more realistic from the start? 😊 it's not like they didn't see any challenges coming... but i guess even with all that investment, ai tech still has a long way to go πŸ€–πŸ’»
 
AI agents are still super experimental πŸ€–πŸ˜ they're not even close to being reliable enough for high-stakes business work...all those promises from Microsoft about how they can automate complex tasks? πŸ™„ it's like they thought everyone would just magically jump on board with these new techs πŸ˜‚ what's really going on here is that companies are super cautious and want more time to figure out the risks involved πŸ’Έ

I mean, we all know how AI models work: parallel processing, supervising model...it sounds fancy but it still means they're basically just making stuff up sometimes 🀯 like ChatGPT? maybe not so bad, OpenAI's got some decent tech there 😊 but Microsoft? nope, not even close to being on the same level πŸ‘Ž

anyway, I guess this is why Microsoft's scaling back their sales targets...they gotta be realistic about what they can actually deliver πŸ€“ it's like they're saying "hey, we know AI agents aren't quite there yet, so let's just tone down the expectations, okay?" πŸ’Έ
 
I think Microsoft's decision is pretty telling... 😊 It shows that even big tech companies like them need to scale back their ambitions when things aren't panning out as expected. I mean, the hype around AI agents was super high, but it looks like reality is catching up and saying "hold on a sec, this isn't quite ready for prime time yet".

It's not just about the technology itself, either... it's also about how businesses and enterprises are using it. The fact that employees prefer ChatGPT over Microsoft's Copilot chatbot tells me there's still some skepticism around these tools. I think it's safe to say we're a ways off from seeing widespread adoption of AI agents in the enterprise space.

Microsoft's decision to lower sales growth targets is probably a way for them to conserve resources and refocus on areas where they can make real progress... but at the same time, it's also a bit concerning. I mean, what does that say about their investment strategy? Are they just trying to stay afloat in a rapidly changing market?
 
😊 I think this is a pretty typical case of "overpromise and underdeliver". Microsoft knew AI agents were still in their infancy when they hyped them up as the next big thing. And yeah, these tech giants always do tend to hype stuff way too much before it actually delivers.

AI models are not yet ready for that kind of high-stakes work. I mean, can you imagine having a system that's responsible for making life-or-death decisions just because it's "almost" 100% accurate? 🀯 No thanks. And yeah, training data is key, but it's not like Microsoft just woke up one day and had all the data they needed. It took years of work to get there.

And you know what really gets my goat? People still keep hyping AI as if it's going to solve all our problems overnight. Newsflash: tech is always a work in progress, and sometimes that means scaling back expectations for a bit πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ.
 
omg i'm like super confused about this news πŸ€”... so microsoft is all like "ai agents are gonna change the game" but now they're scaling back their sales targets? πŸ€‘ like what changed? did they not realize how hard it would be to make these things actually work? πŸ’» and yeah i can see why enterprises would be hesitant, i mean if the technology isn't ready yet... πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ it's kinda like promising a super cool car but still having to fix all the mechanical issues before you can even drive it πŸš—πŸ”§

i'm also curious about why microsoft is investing so much in ai infrastructure despite these struggles πŸ˜• are they just trying to future-proof themselves or what? and btw how does this affect the users of their ai products? will we see a decline in features or something? πŸ€”πŸ’Έ
 
ummm πŸ€”πŸ’­ yeah I feel like they need to get their AI game more solid before making big promises πŸš€πŸ“Š it's one thing to say you're gonna make robots do stuff, but another to actually get them to work without breaking everything πŸ’»πŸ˜© and omg don't even get me started on the chatbot struggles πŸ€–πŸ’” copilot just can't compete with that ChatGPT hype 😎 I guess they need to focus on making AI more reliable and less prone to errors πŸ”§πŸ“Š before trying to sell it to enterprises πŸ’ΌπŸ‘₯
 
I'm kinda surprised by this move from Microsoft πŸ€”. I mean, they were so hyped about AI agents and how they'd revolutionize business productivity... but it seems like reality is setting in πŸ˜…. They had to scale back their growth targets because sales just weren't happening. It's not like they didn't anticipate some challenges, but still, this feels like a pretty big concession 🀯.

I guess the thing is, AI agents are still kinda new and not yet proven in high-stakes environments. We need more robust systems that can handle errors and confabulation before we start adopting them on a large scale 🚧. Microsoft's still investing heavily in AI infrastructure, but it seems like they're building for a future where many enterprises aren't quite ready yet... that's pretty cool 😎
 
I'm kinda surprised by this move from Microsoft πŸ€”. I mean, they were so hyped about AI agents being the next big thing and now they're backing down a bit? It's like how I remember when people used to get all excited about Windows 95 and how it was gonna change everything, but then reality hit and it just didn't live up to the hype 😊. Now, it seems like Microsoft is acknowledging that AI agents aren't quite ready for prime time yet. Maybe they're just trying to set expectations a bit lower? Anyway, I'm still curious to see where this whole AI thing goes from here...
 
Umm, you know what's crazy? I just saw this video of a cat playing the piano 🐈🎹 and it was literally so mesmerizing! I mean, who needs AI agents when you've got cats with natural talent? Just think about how much more productive we'd be if we spent our days watching cute animal videos instead of staring at screens. Maybe Microsoft should just hire a cat to be their sales spokesperson? 🀣 Anyway, back to AI... yeah, I guess it's not ready for primetime yet πŸ•°οΈ.
 
AI agents are gonna be a thing, but maybe not as cool as we thought πŸ€–πŸ’‘ I mean, Microsoft was hyping them up big time, but now they're dialling back expectations a notch. The thing is, AI tech still got some kinks to work out - it's like, these systems can get stuck or mess up in major ways πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. Not exactly what you want when you're trying to automate complex tasks for your business.

I think this is a lesson learned by Microsoft and other tech giants: AI ain't just some magic solution that'll make all our problems disappear πŸ’Έ. It's hard work, requires data and training, and sometimes it just don't wanna cooperate πŸ€–β€β™‚οΈ. But hey, at least they're still investing in it, even if it's not as rosy as the initial projections 😊. Maybe one day AI agents will be the game-changer we all hoped for πŸ”₯
 
AI agents gotta get some serious real world testing before they can make good on Microsoft's promises πŸ€–πŸ’». It's like trying to build a skyscraper without a solid foundation - you're just asking for problems down the line! The fact that enterprise customers are hesitant to invest is a big deal, and it's not just about the tech itself, but also the potential risks involved. I mean, who wants their business operations controlled by a system that can make mistakes? 😬 At this rate, Microsoft needs to slow things down and focus on making AI agents reliable before they start touting them as magic solutions πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ.
 
I'm not surprised πŸ€” they're scaling back their targets. I mean, AI agents are supposed to revolutionize everything, but it seems like they're still stuck in beta testing mode πŸ’». The whole thing feels like a big hype fest. I've been following the Copilot chatbot saga, and honestly, it's hard not to feel underwhelmed πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. OpenAI's ChatGPT just seems more intuitive and user-friendly, you know? But hey, Microsoft's still throwing money at AI research, so maybe they'll get it right eventually πŸ’Έ. Still, it's interesting that they're investing in infrastructure for agentic worker systems while the sales are struggling πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ. Guess that means we might see some advancements in the future... or maybe just more delays πŸ˜….
 
It's kinda surprising that Microsoft, of all companies, is scaling back on AI agent sales targets πŸ€”. I mean, they're basically betting on these techs being the future of business, right? But it seems like enterprise customers are still pretty skeptical about them, at least for now. The thing is, we all know how hard it is to predict when tech innovations will actually take off in practice vs theory πŸ’». And AI agent tech is still a work in progress - errors and false positives can happen, and that's gotta be a major concern for any business considering these systems. Plus, the lack of robust training data and overreliance on pattern-matching limitations are huge hurdles to overcome 🀯. Guess you could say Microsoft is taking a cautious approach for now, which isn't necessarily a bad thing... just a recognition that AI tech needs some serious fine-tuning before it's ready for prime time 😊.
 
I'm kinda surprised by this shift in Microsoft's stance on AI agents πŸ€”. They were really hyped about how these techs could revolutionize productivity and automate complex tasks. But now, they're scaling back their sales growth targets? That's like pulling the plug on a promising project midstream.

I think one of the main reasons for this is that enterprise customers are being super cautious when it comes to investing in AI technologies πŸ“‰. They need to make sure these systems can deliver on their promises and won't lead to major errors or mistakes. And let's be real, we're still a ways off from having reliable AI models that can handle high-stakes autonomous business work.

It's also worth noting that Microsoft is still pouring a ton of resources into AI infrastructure πŸ“ˆ, which suggests they're not ready to give up on the idea just yet. They're essentially building the wheels for a future where AI agents are a norm, even if many enterprises aren't quite there yet. So while this might seem like a step back, it's also kinda like being cautious and taking the time to get things right πŸ™.
 
I'm not surprised about this πŸ€”. I mean, AI agents sound like they'd save so much time and work but in practice, it's all about the errors and mistakes right? Like, who wants to trust a system with their business when you can just stick with what you know? πŸ’Ό And don't even get me started on the training data thing... how do you even prepare for every possible scenario? 🀯

I'm also curious, why did Microsoft think they could just push AI agents as a solution without really understanding the risks and limitations? Like, didn't they do any thorough testing or research? πŸ€” And what's with the chatbot struggle? I mean, it's not like OpenAI's ChatGPT is some magical solution... isn't that just another technology to learn? πŸ€–

I guess this just shows how fast tech companies are moving and sometimes they might overlook some details. But hey, at least Microsoft is being honest about their growth targets now... maybe they can use this as a chance to refine their strategy and make AI agents more viable for businesses πŸ’‘
 
πŸ€” So I'm reading this about Microsoft scaling back its sales growth targets for AI agents... like, what's going on? They were super hyped about these things being the future of business but now they're having major issues with customer adoption? 🚨 It just goes to show how hard it is to make AI work in real-world scenarios. I mean, we all know it's not perfect yet, but still... Microsoft's been investing a ton in this stuff and now they're backing down? 😊

I think what bothers me is that we were promised these AI agents would revolutionize productivity, but instead they're struggling to catch on? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ And the reasons are pretty legit - like, AI models still need huge amounts of training data and they can be prone to errors. It's not just about throwing money at it either; you gotta address the fundamental limitations of these systems.

Anyway, I guess this is a wake-up call for Microsoft (and maybe even the rest of us) to take a step back and reassess what we're trying to accomplish with AI. We need to make sure we're building something that's actually practical and reliable before we start making promises about its capabilities 🀯
 
man i feel u πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ microsoft was all hype about ai agents like they were gonna revolutionize everything but now its just another tech giant trying to figure out how to make these things work lol guess the reality check came sooner than expected πŸ’Έ. enterprises are just not ready for this stuff yet, gotta train more data and iron out those errors πŸ€–. anyway, still cool that they're investing in ai infrastructure, who knows maybe one day we'll have some crazy efficient solutions 😎
 
I'm kinda surprised about this news πŸ€” Microsoft was super hyped about AI agents and thought they'd revolutionize productivity. But, I guess their sales team didn't quite live up to the hype πŸ˜… The thing is, AI technology still has a way to go before it's ready for high-stakes use cases. It's not just about errors and confabulation, but also the need for tons of training data and the risk of making catastrophic mistakes 🀯 I mean, I'm all for innovation, but we gotta be realistic about what these tech giants can achieve right now πŸ’»
 
Back
Top