Rep. Raja Krishnamoorthi's letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem raises alarming questions about a plan by U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to award monetary bonuses to private bounty hunters.
The proposal, first reported by The Intercept, aims to deploy privatized investigators to track down immigrants residing in the US. These bounty hunters would be tasked with conducting surveillance and pinpointing the home address of "aliens," who are defined as non-US citizens or nationals. They could earn bonus payments based on how many immigrants they help apprehend, and how quickly.
Krishnamoorthi expresses grave concerns over this plan, stating that it raises worrying questions about accountability. In a letter to Noem, he writes: "Allowing private contractors to perform enforcement activities under a system of performance-based financial incentives, essentially bounty hunting, outsources one of the government's most coercive powers to actors who operate with little oversight and limited public accountability."
Krishnamoorthi fears that entrusting these private contractors with powers of investigation and surveillance risks creating an enforcement apparatus that functions beyond the reach of ordinary checks and balances. He warns that this system built on quotas and cash rewards with minimal oversight will inevitably lead to mistakes, as the pressure to hit numbers replaces judgment, training, and accountability.
Furthermore, Krishnamoorthi is concerned about how the plan will further blur the line between federal authority and the private sector, adding more corporate profit motive to the government's chaotic domestic immigration operations. He notes that this system invites abuses, secrecy, and corruption, which the founders sought to prevent.
ICE has declined to comment on Krishnamoorthi's inquiry, stating that the Request for Information is solely for planning purposes and does not restrict the government to any acquisition approach. However, the proposal raises significant concerns about the erosion of accountability and the potential for abuse of power in the enforcement of immigration laws.
The proposal, first reported by The Intercept, aims to deploy privatized investigators to track down immigrants residing in the US. These bounty hunters would be tasked with conducting surveillance and pinpointing the home address of "aliens," who are defined as non-US citizens or nationals. They could earn bonus payments based on how many immigrants they help apprehend, and how quickly.
Krishnamoorthi expresses grave concerns over this plan, stating that it raises worrying questions about accountability. In a letter to Noem, he writes: "Allowing private contractors to perform enforcement activities under a system of performance-based financial incentives, essentially bounty hunting, outsources one of the government's most coercive powers to actors who operate with little oversight and limited public accountability."
Krishnamoorthi fears that entrusting these private contractors with powers of investigation and surveillance risks creating an enforcement apparatus that functions beyond the reach of ordinary checks and balances. He warns that this system built on quotas and cash rewards with minimal oversight will inevitably lead to mistakes, as the pressure to hit numbers replaces judgment, training, and accountability.
Furthermore, Krishnamoorthi is concerned about how the plan will further blur the line between federal authority and the private sector, adding more corporate profit motive to the government's chaotic domestic immigration operations. He notes that this system invites abuses, secrecy, and corruption, which the founders sought to prevent.
ICE has declined to comment on Krishnamoorthi's inquiry, stating that the Request for Information is solely for planning purposes and does not restrict the government to any acquisition approach. However, the proposal raises significant concerns about the erosion of accountability and the potential for abuse of power in the enforcement of immigration laws.