"Labour and the Tories are banking on a return to the 'old normal' - but that's not what voters want. The two parties are assuming a historic claim to primacy within their respective coalitions, but this sense of entitlement doesn't reflect the balance of real-world opinion.
The plan is that economic growth and governing competence will boost general wellbeing in the coming years, while the alternative is Nigel Farage. However, this calculation assumes continuity of a trend for the ruling parties to regain support when a general election comes around.
Labour hopes that Labour's recovery rests on this distinction, but it seems unlikely. The party is still struggling to convince voters that it has a theory of what had gone wrong in the meantime and a plan to fix it. Keir Starmer's failure to communicate these things is one point on which opinion polls are unambiguous.
The Conservatives, on the other hand, are banking on an optimistic scenario where the economy falters, and they surge with a campaign arguing that Labour has overtaxed Britain and misspent the proceeds. This assumes that politics will follow precedent and that beneath the surface, volatility flows strong and familiar currents.
However, this is not what voters want. The old normal - a duopoly of Labour and the Tories - is exactly what's under threat. Recent local council races suggest an England dominated by Reform and the Liberal Democrats, rather than the traditional two-party system.
The future is never fixed, but it seems that the scale of change might be seismic. Acceptance that current unpopularity is not just a consequence of dissatisfaction with choices made by the present government but also a reflection of doubt that politics in the familiar configuration can deliver anything other than disappointment is required.
Rafael Behr argues that Labour and Tory leaders have a lot invested in old patterns reasserting themselves, making it hard to accept the possibility of permanent change. The historic Labour-Tory rivalry is also a kind of mutual dependency, where they define themselves as ideological antitheses and find it hard to admit shared ownership with voters.
Ultimately, normal political patterns indicate that either Labour or Badenoch could turn their parties' fortunes around, but recent politics suggests otherwise. Voters don't want the old normal back - they want change."
The plan is that economic growth and governing competence will boost general wellbeing in the coming years, while the alternative is Nigel Farage. However, this calculation assumes continuity of a trend for the ruling parties to regain support when a general election comes around.
Labour hopes that Labour's recovery rests on this distinction, but it seems unlikely. The party is still struggling to convince voters that it has a theory of what had gone wrong in the meantime and a plan to fix it. Keir Starmer's failure to communicate these things is one point on which opinion polls are unambiguous.
The Conservatives, on the other hand, are banking on an optimistic scenario where the economy falters, and they surge with a campaign arguing that Labour has overtaxed Britain and misspent the proceeds. This assumes that politics will follow precedent and that beneath the surface, volatility flows strong and familiar currents.
However, this is not what voters want. The old normal - a duopoly of Labour and the Tories - is exactly what's under threat. Recent local council races suggest an England dominated by Reform and the Liberal Democrats, rather than the traditional two-party system.
The future is never fixed, but it seems that the scale of change might be seismic. Acceptance that current unpopularity is not just a consequence of dissatisfaction with choices made by the present government but also a reflection of doubt that politics in the familiar configuration can deliver anything other than disappointment is required.
Rafael Behr argues that Labour and Tory leaders have a lot invested in old patterns reasserting themselves, making it hard to accept the possibility of permanent change. The historic Labour-Tory rivalry is also a kind of mutual dependency, where they define themselves as ideological antitheses and find it hard to admit shared ownership with voters.
Ultimately, normal political patterns indicate that either Labour or Badenoch could turn their parties' fortunes around, but recent politics suggests otherwise. Voters don't want the old normal back - they want change."