Federal Judge Orders Release of Immigrant Detainee Held Without Lawful Authority
In a significant victory for due process, US District Judge Paula Xinis of Maryland has ruled that the Trump administration lacked the legal authority to continue holding Kilmar Abrego Garcia in an immigration detention center. The order came after a lengthy court battle over Garcia's deportation efforts.
Garcia, who was wrongly removed from El Salvador in March and returned to the US over the summer, was being held at the Moshannon Valley Processing Center in Pennsylvania despite having no final order of removal. Xinis's ruling cited that his removal could not be considered reasonably foreseeable, imminent, or consistent with due process.
According to Garcia's lead counsel, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, the ruling marks a "turning point" for his client and is a powerful affirmation that the rule of law still matters. The court made it clear that the government cannot detain a person indefinitely without legal authority.
However, the Department of Homeland Security has criticized the order as "naked judicial activism" by an Obama-appointed judge. Tricia McLaughlin, a DHS spokeswoman, called the ruling "lacking any valid legal basis" and vowed to continue fighting the decision in the courts.
The Trump administration had been seeking to deport Garcia to multiple African countries and Costa Rica despite acknowledging that none of these options were viable. Xinis's ruling also found that the government had affirmatively misled the court last month, stating that Liberia was the only viable removal option when in fact Costa Rica had never wavered in its commitment to receive Garcia.
Garcia's case has highlighted the Trump administration's enforcement policies in pursuit of President Donald Trump's mass deportation campaign. In April, federal officials admitted to an "administrative error" that landed Garcia in a notorious Salvadoran megaprison despite a 2019 court order barring authorities from deporting him to his native El Salvador due to credible threats.
Garcia's family and attorneys have consistently denied the gang affiliation accusations made by the Trump administration. According to court records, he entered the US in March 2012, claiming to have fled "gang violence targeting his family" in El Salvador. The government initiated removal proceedings after Garcia was arrested on charges unrelated to immigration.
After much resistance from the Trump administration, Garcia returned to the US in June and was hit with human smuggling charges in Tennessee. Under court order, he must comply with strict release conditions ahead of his trial, including actively seeking employment and avoiding contact with certain individuals.
The latest ruling is a significant development in this case, which has received international attention for its implications on due process and immigration enforcement policies.
In a significant victory for due process, US District Judge Paula Xinis of Maryland has ruled that the Trump administration lacked the legal authority to continue holding Kilmar Abrego Garcia in an immigration detention center. The order came after a lengthy court battle over Garcia's deportation efforts.
Garcia, who was wrongly removed from El Salvador in March and returned to the US over the summer, was being held at the Moshannon Valley Processing Center in Pennsylvania despite having no final order of removal. Xinis's ruling cited that his removal could not be considered reasonably foreseeable, imminent, or consistent with due process.
According to Garcia's lead counsel, Simon Sandoval-Moshenberg, the ruling marks a "turning point" for his client and is a powerful affirmation that the rule of law still matters. The court made it clear that the government cannot detain a person indefinitely without legal authority.
However, the Department of Homeland Security has criticized the order as "naked judicial activism" by an Obama-appointed judge. Tricia McLaughlin, a DHS spokeswoman, called the ruling "lacking any valid legal basis" and vowed to continue fighting the decision in the courts.
The Trump administration had been seeking to deport Garcia to multiple African countries and Costa Rica despite acknowledging that none of these options were viable. Xinis's ruling also found that the government had affirmatively misled the court last month, stating that Liberia was the only viable removal option when in fact Costa Rica had never wavered in its commitment to receive Garcia.
Garcia's case has highlighted the Trump administration's enforcement policies in pursuit of President Donald Trump's mass deportation campaign. In April, federal officials admitted to an "administrative error" that landed Garcia in a notorious Salvadoran megaprison despite a 2019 court order barring authorities from deporting him to his native El Salvador due to credible threats.
Garcia's family and attorneys have consistently denied the gang affiliation accusations made by the Trump administration. According to court records, he entered the US in March 2012, claiming to have fled "gang violence targeting his family" in El Salvador. The government initiated removal proceedings after Garcia was arrested on charges unrelated to immigration.
After much resistance from the Trump administration, Garcia returned to the US in June and was hit with human smuggling charges in Tennessee. Under court order, he must comply with strict release conditions ahead of his trial, including actively seeking employment and avoiding contact with certain individuals.
The latest ruling is a significant development in this case, which has received international attention for its implications on due process and immigration enforcement policies.