Judge blocks Trump administration from withholding transportation funds over immigration enforcement

Federal Judge Sides with Illinois and 19 Other States in Transportation Funding Dispute Over Immigration Enforcement

A US federal court has ruled against the Trump administration, blocking it from withholding billions of dollars in transportation funding from states that cooperate with federal immigration enforcement efforts. The ruling came as a significant victory for Illinois and 19 other states, which have been fighting against the administration's attempt to use transportation funds as leverage to pressure them into participating in its nationwide immigration crackdowns.

The decision, issued by Rhode Island District Judge John R. McConnell, found that the Department of Transportation overstepped its authority by imposing arbitrary conditions on states that work with federal authorities on immigration enforcement. The ruling stated that this was a blatant attempt to coerce states into complying with the administration's policies, which critics have described as cruel.

The move is part of a broader pattern of attempts by the Trump administration to use federal funding as leverage over state and local governments that refuse to cooperate with its immigration policies. Just last month, Illinois and other states won another court victory when a federal judge blocked the administration from withholding disaster relief funds from states with "sanctuary laws" in place.

"This is outrageous," said Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul, who has been leading the fight against the administration's attempts to use transportation funding as leverage. "The billions of dollars appropriated by Congress are essential to states' efforts to keep their residents safe while they travel our roads, railways, and skies. We cannot allow the administration to hold critical funding hostage in order to force us into complying with its immigration policies."

The decision is a significant win for Illinois and other states that have been pushing back against the Trump administration's attempts to use federal funding as leverage over their laws and policies on immigration enforcement.
 
awww man πŸ€• this ruling is like a huge weight has been lifted off those 20 states' shoulders 🌟 they've been fighting so hard for what feels like forever, and it's amazing that the court finally said 'hey, you can't use our transportation funding as leverage to make us do your immigration thing!' 😩 it's not just about the money, it's about respecting state autonomy and keeping people safe. i'm sending all my virtual hugs to Illinois and those other states πŸ€— keep standing up for what's right, even when it's hard! πŸ’ͺ
 
🚨 This ruling is super important! 🚨 I think it's crazy that the admin was trying to use transportation funds to control how states handle immigration. Like, what's next? πŸ€” They're already using disaster relief funds as leverage - now they want to play with fire and take away billions from states just because they don't wanna cooperate with their policies? 🚫 It's a clear abuse of power. Glad the judge stood up for Illinois and 19 other states! πŸ’ͺ
 
I'm not sure how thrilled I am about this ruling πŸ€”. Like, don't get me wrong, it's awesome that Illinois and all those other states are fighting back against the Trump admin trying to strong-arm them into doing stuff they don't want to do. But let's be real, what's the end game here? Just gonna keep piling up all these court cases and lawsuits until someone gets tired of throwing money around πŸ€‘.

And honestly, can we talk about how ridiculous it is that we're having to fight over this in the first place? Like, shouldn't Congress just put a simple "no" next to whatever policy they want states to follow? No need for all these court battles and judges weighing in. It's just so... slow πŸ•°οΈ.

I guess what I'm saying is that while I'm happy for Illinois and co., I think we're all just stuck in this never-ending cycle of bureaucratic red tape πŸ“¨. Can't we just, like, agree on stuff already? πŸ’”
 
Ugh, this is just another example of how dysfunctional our government can be 🀯😑. I mean, what's next? The state of Illinois just got a major victory in court, but it's not like they're going to get any credit for it since the Trump admin is already planning its next move. It's all just a game of bureaucratic cat and mouse at this point.

And can we talk about how ridiculous it is that the feds are trying to use transportation funds as leverage over states? Like, what even is the logic behind that? Don't they know that state governments have better things to do than play politics with people's lives? It's just so... so... ugh πŸ™„.

And don't even get me started on how much money this is about. Billions of dollars are at stake here, and it's all because the Trump admin wants to exert its power over states that aren't willing to go along with its immigration policies. I mean, what a mess πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ.

Can we just get some real leadership around here who can actually solve problems rather than just playing politics?
 
🀯 this is soooo not right! I mean, I get it, states have different views on immigration, but using our transportation funds as a bargaining chip? That's just wrong 🚫. Our roads are meant for everyone to use, not just those who fit the admin's definition of "safe" πŸ˜’. And what about all the people who rely on public transport, like students and low-income families? They're already struggling, we shouldn't be making it harder for them πŸ€•. Let's keep our funding separate from politics and focus on building a safer, more inclusive community for everyone! πŸŒŽπŸ’–
 
πŸš—πŸ’Έ I'm all for states having control over how they spend their federal funds, you know? It's crazy that the government was trying to pull this fast one on Illinois and other states, holding up billions of dollars in transportation funding just because they didn't want to cooperate with Trump's immigration policies 🀯. It's like they thought we'd just roll over and take it. But nope, these states stood up for themselves and fought back, and now the courts have ruled in their favor πŸ™Œ.

I'm glad to see Illinois AG Kwame Raoul leading the charge on this one – he's been all over the news talking about how this funding is crucial for keeping residents safe while traveling. And let's be real, who doesn't love a good road trip? 😎 The fact that states have some wiggle room in how they spend their funds is huge, especially when it comes to things like transportation and public safety.

It's also worth noting that this ruling sends a message to the Trump administration: you can't just use federal funding as leverage to get what you want. Period. πŸ’ͺ States have rights too, you know? πŸ™
 
i'm kinda surprised they finally ruled against the trump admin, feels like it's about time πŸ€”. but at the same time, i don't think this is a huge win for the states or whatever. i mean, the fact that they had to go to court in the first place is pretty wild, right? and what's with the whole "coercing" thing? it sounds like some major overreach to me 🚨. but hey, at least it's not going to hurt anyone directly, so that's a plus i guess πŸ‘
 
πŸš—πŸ’¨ I'm low-key relieved this happened! Like, can you imagine if the gov was able to just take away funding from states for not following their immigration "rules"? That's super scary for local communities 🀯. And it's not like they're asking for much – just some basic guidelines on how to handle asylum seekers and refugees without making them feel super unwelcome 😐.

I think this ruling is a great example of the power of state governments pushing back against federal overreach 🌎. It's like, yeah, the feds have their authority, but states also get to decide what works best for their communities πŸ‘₯. And honestly, I'm all about supporting local economies and keeping our roads safe – it's not just about immigration policies, it's about keeping people safe in general ❀️.

But seriously, this ruling could be a game-changer for states that are already dealing with some crazy stuff related to immigration 🀯. Like, Illinois is already facing so many challenges with their budget and infrastructure – this extra funding would be a total lifesaver πŸ’Έ. Fingers crossed it stays this way! 🀞
 
man this is insane 🀯 how can they just withhold billions of dollars in transportation funds from states just because they don't want to cooperate with their immigration plans? it's like holding a kid hostage, you know? πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ states are already stretched thin trying to take care of everyone on the roads and now they're trying to make them choose between keeping their residents safe or getting funding? no way! this is why we need more oversight and accountability in our government πŸ˜’
 
man, this is good news for all those states that are trying not to get pulled into the whole immigration mess πŸ™ŒπŸ½. i mean, can't we just focus on getting our roads and trains fixed without having to deal with the politics of it all? like, what's next? are they gonna start withholding funding for schools or hospitals too? πŸ€”β€β™‚οΈ it's already crazy enough when you have to navigate all the different state laws and regulations. i'm just glad that some common sense was applied here and the judge said nope, you can't use transportation funds as leverage like that πŸ’ΈπŸš«
 
just read this and I'm so done with the trump admin lol πŸ€¦β€β™‚οΈ they think they can just play politics with peoples lives like that? i mean, what's next? withholding funds for healthcare or education because someone dont wanna cooperate with their 'immigration policies'? no way jose! states gotta make their own decisions on how to keep their communities safe and secure. this ruling is a major win for ilinois and all the other states standing up against trump's bullying tactics πŸ™ŒπŸ’ͺ
 
I mean come on, this isn't even news anymore. Like, 2023 was all about this already 🀯. The admin just can't get it through its head that states have the right to make their own decisions on immigration policy without being held hostage by federal funding. I feel like they're trying to strong-arm us into doing what they want, and it's not going down well πŸ™„. And honestly, who doesn't think withholding billions of dollars in transportation funding is a total overreach? It's just another example of the admin's "tough on immigrants" shtick, which is basically just a euphemism for "we're gonna make you jump through hoops to stay here". Give states a break, am I right? πŸ™
 
omg, like, i just saw this news and i'm still trying to understand what's going on 🀯... so basically, some states are mad at the trump admin for trying to withhold money from them if they don't do certain things with immigrants? but isn't that kinda like the feds telling the states how to run their own stuff? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ anyway, i guess it's good that the judge said no to that, 'cause who wants their funding taken away just because of politics?

so like, what even is a sanctuary law, anyway? i feel like i should know this but... πŸ€” also, can someone explain to me why we need so many laws and rules about immigration? it seems kinda complicated πŸ™ƒ
 
Ugh, this ruling is a no-brainer πŸ™„! I mean, come on, who tries to hold billions of dollars in transportation funds hostage? It's just common sense, states get funding for roads and trains, they shouldn't have to worry about getting their hands dirty with immigration enforcement. And let's be real, the Trump admin is all about playing politics and using people's money as a bargaining chip. Newsflash: it's not going to fly, everyone knows that! πŸ˜’

And btw, I'm surprised the judge didn't just throw out the case entirely, like, what's next? The gov trying to take away their right to vote or something? 🀣 No seriously though, this is a huge win for states and a major setback for the admin's attempts to exert control over local governments. It's about time someone stood up for states' rights! πŸ‘
 
omg this ruling is EVERYTHING πŸ€©πŸš— i'm so down for states taking a stand against the gov't using transportation funds as leverage over immigration policies it's like, we get it they have concerns but holding our lives hostage isn't the answer πŸ’ΈπŸ˜’ anyways gotta give props to Illinois and those 19 other states for fighting this hard πŸ™ŒπŸ½πŸ‘
 
omg, can you believe this?! 🀯 they're trying to take away billions of dollars from states just because they don't wanna cooperate with the trump admin's immigration policies?! that's like taking money away from people who need it most - like healthcare or education funds!

i think this ruling is super fair and i'm so glad illoinois and 20 other states are fighting back against this. it's crazy how the trump admin thinks they can just use federal funding as leverage over states' decisions on immigration enforcement. it's not right and we should be standing with these states who are trying to keep their residents safe.

anyway, i'm so hyped that this judge is taking a stand for what's right πŸ™Œ
 
Back
Top