Joey Barton's descent into the depths of social media vitriol has left many questioning whether his freedom of speech is being curtailed by the law. The former Manchester City midfielder, 43, is currently on trial at Liverpool Crown Court, accused of sending grossly offensive electronic communications with intent to cause distress or anxiety.
The crux of the matter lies in Barton's posts on social media platform X, which targeted broadcaster Jeremy Vine and female television pundits Eni Aluko and Lucy Ward. Wright KC, prosecuting, painted a picture of a deliberate course of conduct by Barton, who cultivated a publicly-expressed disapproval of female commentators in what he sees as the male preserve of football.
The prosecution posits that Barton crossed the line between free speech and a crime, with Mr Vine responding to comparisons by posting: "What's going on with Joey7Barton? I just glanced at the Rose West thing... genuinely, is it possible we are dealing with a brain injury here?" The defendant did not take this as an expression of concern for his wellbeing but rather as an insult.
Mr Wright added that Barton sent a post to Jeremy Vine's X account in which he referred to him as 'you big bike nonce' and reposted an image with the caption "If you see this fella by a primary school call 999". The court heard that these posts were defamatory, puerile, and infantile, going beyond what is tolerable in society.
Barton denies all charges. The trial continues, leaving many to wonder whether our democratic, free society truly allows for the expression of views that are 'offensive, shocking or personally rude'.
The crux of the matter lies in Barton's posts on social media platform X, which targeted broadcaster Jeremy Vine and female television pundits Eni Aluko and Lucy Ward. Wright KC, prosecuting, painted a picture of a deliberate course of conduct by Barton, who cultivated a publicly-expressed disapproval of female commentators in what he sees as the male preserve of football.
The prosecution posits that Barton crossed the line between free speech and a crime, with Mr Vine responding to comparisons by posting: "What's going on with Joey7Barton? I just glanced at the Rose West thing... genuinely, is it possible we are dealing with a brain injury here?" The defendant did not take this as an expression of concern for his wellbeing but rather as an insult.
Mr Wright added that Barton sent a post to Jeremy Vine's X account in which he referred to him as 'you big bike nonce' and reposted an image with the caption "If you see this fella by a primary school call 999". The court heard that these posts were defamatory, puerile, and infantile, going beyond what is tolerable in society.
Barton denies all charges. The trial continues, leaving many to wonder whether our democratic, free society truly allows for the expression of views that are 'offensive, shocking or personally rude'.