Elon Musk's Full Self-Driving (FSD) project has long been touted as a revolutionary breakthrough in autonomous technology. However, the reality is far from it.
In 2025, Tesla CEO Elon Musk confidently stated that FSD would be ready for unsupervised operation by the end of the year. But, when you scratch beneath the surface, it's clear that his predictions were nothing more than a smoke screen designed to keep investors and the public at bay.
Instead, what we got was a watered-down version of FSD - a Level 2 system where drivers are required to stay focused on the road and be ready to take control of the vehicle when prompted. This is not full self-driving, but rather a stepping stone towards it.
Fast forward to 2026, and Musk has once again moved the goalposts. He claims that Tesla needs to accumulate roughly 10 billion miles of data before FSD can achieve "safe unsupervised self-driving." Given that Tesla already has over 7 billion miles of data, it's astonishing that Musk is still struggling to meet his own targets.
So, what's behind this endless cycle of false promises and broken deadlines? The answer lies in the financial benefits of regulatory capture. By keeping FSD as a supervised system, Tesla can avoid taking full responsibility for any incidents that occur. This means that the company can continue to reap profits without having to accept liability for its vehicles.
As we head into 2027, it's clear that Musk's vision of a fully autonomous future is nothing more than a myth. The real concern should be about how this technology will impact public safety and accountability. As long as FSD remains under the radar, Tesla can continue to profit from its drivers without being held accountable for their actions.
In conclusion, Elon Musk's Full Self-Driving project has become a laughingstock in the tech world. It's time for him to take responsibility for his claims and deliver on his promises. Until then, we're stuck with a system that is woefully inadequate for the roads of today.
In 2025, Tesla CEO Elon Musk confidently stated that FSD would be ready for unsupervised operation by the end of the year. But, when you scratch beneath the surface, it's clear that his predictions were nothing more than a smoke screen designed to keep investors and the public at bay.
Instead, what we got was a watered-down version of FSD - a Level 2 system where drivers are required to stay focused on the road and be ready to take control of the vehicle when prompted. This is not full self-driving, but rather a stepping stone towards it.
Fast forward to 2026, and Musk has once again moved the goalposts. He claims that Tesla needs to accumulate roughly 10 billion miles of data before FSD can achieve "safe unsupervised self-driving." Given that Tesla already has over 7 billion miles of data, it's astonishing that Musk is still struggling to meet his own targets.
So, what's behind this endless cycle of false promises and broken deadlines? The answer lies in the financial benefits of regulatory capture. By keeping FSD as a supervised system, Tesla can avoid taking full responsibility for any incidents that occur. This means that the company can continue to reap profits without having to accept liability for its vehicles.
As we head into 2027, it's clear that Musk's vision of a fully autonomous future is nothing more than a myth. The real concern should be about how this technology will impact public safety and accountability. As long as FSD remains under the radar, Tesla can continue to profit from its drivers without being held accountable for their actions.
In conclusion, Elon Musk's Full Self-Driving project has become a laughingstock in the tech world. It's time for him to take responsibility for his claims and deliver on his promises. Until then, we're stuck with a system that is woefully inadequate for the roads of today.
. I mean, come on! 10 billion miles of data? That's just not realistic. My kid could collect that much data driving around their friends' houses in a week 
. And what's with all the excuses? Regulatory capture? Come on, let's stop playing dumb. As a parent, it's terrifying to think about our kids relying on technology to drive them around without human oversight. We need safer roads, not some pie-in-the-sky tech solution that's just going to get delayed and delayed again 
. Can't we just have honest conversations about what we're really capable of? 
. We need to start prioritizing public safety over profits, not just making a quick buck 
. I'm all for innovation, but when it comes at the expense of our well-being, that's just not cool 
.
it's so sad because all this tech has the potential to change the world, but instead they're just playing it safe... or rather, not doing enough to make it safe for us 
it's like he thinks he can just wave a magic wand and make autonomous cars appear out of thin air. But what really gets me is how Tesla is trying to avoid accountability by keeping it under supervision 
10 billion miles of data? Come on, dude, you already have that and still can't deliver on your promises. I'm starting to think that FSD is just a fancy way of saying "Tesla has its own insurance policy" 
.
. Not just some pie-in-the-sky tech that's going to leave us all stranded on the side of the road 
. And can we talk about how this tech is supposed to improve public safety but honestly it's more like a ticking time bomb waiting to happen? Not impressed with Tesla or Musk right now 
and you're telling us you need another 3 billion to get it "safe"? Give me a break! 
. We need honest info about FSD's capabilities, not smoke and mirrors 
. Until then, I'll be keeping my eyes (and wheels) on the road, just waiting for someone to come along and actually make autonomous driving happen 
. at this point, i think we need some independent reviews and audits to get to the bottom of what's really going on 
. It's like Musk is trying to give us a glimpse of the future without actually delivering on it 
. And don't even get me started on this "10 billion miles" thing... that just sounds like a bunch of marketing hype 
. We need more transparency, not less 
.
. If that thing can't be trusted to stay on track without constant human supervision, what's the point of even calling it self-driving?
. It's time for him to take responsibility for his claims and deliver on his promises. Until then, I'll stick to my human-driven cars, thank you very much!
. It's just a money grab at this point, using all these promises as a smokescreen to keep investors and the public distracted while they rake it in 
. Can't we just get some real progress on this autonomous tech already?! 
. And what's with all these moving goalposts? It's like Musk is trying to keep everyone distracted while he makes a ton of cash off of his "vision" 
Tesla needs to stop playing it cool and start delivering 