Man, I'm thinking this is a total slippery slope thingy. If NJ signs these bills into law, it's gonna set a precedent for all other states to follow suit. Next thing you know, the feds are gonna start dictating what individual states can and can't do regarding immigration policies. 
I mean, I get it, we're talking about people's lives here, but we gotta be careful not to create more problems than solutions. What's next? Are they gonna start telling us how to run our own states too? It's like, come on, Phil Murphy, you can't just let the advocacy groups bully you into signing these bills without considering the bigger picture.
And what about the economic implications? If we're making it easier for people to remain silent about their immigration status, aren't we gonna see more folks taking advantage of the system and leaving behind taxes and contributions to society? It's a tough one, man. I'm all for protecting immigrant rights, but we gotta do it in a way that doesn't create unintended consequences.
It's like, what's the real agenda here? Are these groups just looking out for their own interests or are they genuinely trying to help people? And what about Murphy's conditional veto – is he just trying to stall or really trying to make a stand? The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that this whole thing is gonna be a big mess.
I mean, I get it, we're talking about people's lives here, but we gotta be careful not to create more problems than solutions. What's next? Are they gonna start telling us how to run our own states too? It's like, come on, Phil Murphy, you can't just let the advocacy groups bully you into signing these bills without considering the bigger picture.
And what about the economic implications? If we're making it easier for people to remain silent about their immigration status, aren't we gonna see more folks taking advantage of the system and leaving behind taxes and contributions to society? It's a tough one, man. I'm all for protecting immigrant rights, but we gotta do it in a way that doesn't create unintended consequences.
It's like, what's the real agenda here? Are these groups just looking out for their own interests or are they genuinely trying to help people? And what about Murphy's conditional veto – is he just trying to stall or really trying to make a stand? The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that this whole thing is gonna be a big mess.