The US Congress has been effectively absent for nearly 40 days, with no votes taken during this period, as the federal government remains in a shutdown. Despite its constitutional role in lawmaking and budgeting, the House of Representatives has failed to assert itself as an equal branch of government.
In contrast to its historical role as "The People's Chamber," Congress has been unwilling to take bold action or make meaningful decisions, instead opting for behind-the-scenes negotiations with the Senate on issues like judicial nominations, defense authorization bills, and tariff policies. The lack of transparency and accountability from the House is particularly concerning given that many Americans are voting in state and local elections this November.
The shutdown does not mean Congress cannot meet, as it can pass legislation to end the impasse. However, with dwindling SNAP benefits, skyrocketing healthcare premiums, and other major shutdown impacts starting to set in, the House has abdicated its position of importance.
This phenomenon is part of a broader trend of erosion that has created a political culture where Congress is relegated to second-class status. For decades, Congress has been eroded by a process called "political nationalization," where American politics have become increasingly centered on national issues and parties, rather than local concerns or individuals.
As a result, voters focus more on presidential elections and less on congressional ones, granting the president greater influence and diminishing Congress' independent authority. The more Congress polarizes among its members on a party-line basis, the less the public is likely to trust the legitimacy of its opposition to a president.
A weak Congress paired with an "Imperial Presidency" creates an unaccountable leader who runs wild without constitutional oversight and checks on power. This is a recipe for disaster, as individual perspectives from different districts are lost in the process, and local problems are left unaddressed.
The Constitution places Congress first, but in reality, Congress has been playing second fiddle to the president's agenda. The founding fathers intentionally placed Congress at the top of the federal government hierarchy because they wanted power decentralized among a wide variety of elected leaders from different parts of the country.
However, this vision is being dismantled by decades of erosion and a shifting political landscape that prioritizes presidential control over congressional authority. As Charlie Hunt, Associate Professor of Political Science at Boise State University, notes, "A weak Congress paired with what historian Arthur Schlesinger called the 'Imperial Presidency' is a recipe for an unaccountable president."
				
			In contrast to its historical role as "The People's Chamber," Congress has been unwilling to take bold action or make meaningful decisions, instead opting for behind-the-scenes negotiations with the Senate on issues like judicial nominations, defense authorization bills, and tariff policies. The lack of transparency and accountability from the House is particularly concerning given that many Americans are voting in state and local elections this November.
The shutdown does not mean Congress cannot meet, as it can pass legislation to end the impasse. However, with dwindling SNAP benefits, skyrocketing healthcare premiums, and other major shutdown impacts starting to set in, the House has abdicated its position of importance.
This phenomenon is part of a broader trend of erosion that has created a political culture where Congress is relegated to second-class status. For decades, Congress has been eroded by a process called "political nationalization," where American politics have become increasingly centered on national issues and parties, rather than local concerns or individuals.
As a result, voters focus more on presidential elections and less on congressional ones, granting the president greater influence and diminishing Congress' independent authority. The more Congress polarizes among its members on a party-line basis, the less the public is likely to trust the legitimacy of its opposition to a president.
A weak Congress paired with an "Imperial Presidency" creates an unaccountable leader who runs wild without constitutional oversight and checks on power. This is a recipe for disaster, as individual perspectives from different districts are lost in the process, and local problems are left unaddressed.
The Constitution places Congress first, but in reality, Congress has been playing second fiddle to the president's agenda. The founding fathers intentionally placed Congress at the top of the federal government hierarchy because they wanted power decentralized among a wide variety of elected leaders from different parts of the country.
However, this vision is being dismantled by decades of erosion and a shifting political landscape that prioritizes presidential control over congressional authority. As Charlie Hunt, Associate Professor of Political Science at Boise State University, notes, "A weak Congress paired with what historian Arthur Schlesinger called the 'Imperial Presidency' is a recipe for an unaccountable president."