In a stunning display of vitriol, former US President Donald Trump lashed out at the judge presiding over his arraignment on felony charges during a speech at his Mar-a-Lago resort. According to CNN's Maggie Haberman, who broke down the significance behind Trump's attack, it was not just about the judge or the case itself but a broader attempt to control the narrative and manipulate public opinion.
Trump's remarks were largely a rehashing of conspiracy theories surrounding the indictment, with him claiming that he had been "setup" by deep-state actors. However, Haberman notes that these claims are baseless and have already been thoroughly debunked by law enforcement officials.
The real purpose behind Trump's tirade, according to Haberman, was to create a sense of urgency and panic among his supporters, while also attempting to deflect attention from the seriousness of the charges against him. By attacking the judge and his family, Trump aimed to tap into the emotions of his base, creating a sense of shared grievance and rallying cry.
In essence, Trump's actions represent a classic example of gaslighting, where he attempts to convince his followers that they are being unfairly targeted or wronged, while ignoring the facts and evidence. Haberman highlights that this is a common tactic used by authoritarian leaders to maintain control over their base and avoid accountability for their actions.
Ultimately, Trump's outburst serves as a reminder of the dangers of unchecked power and the erosion of trust in institutions. As Haberman aptly puts it, "the president's behavior at Mar-a-Lago suggests that he is not taking responsibility for his own actions, but rather trying to control the narrative."
Trump's remarks were largely a rehashing of conspiracy theories surrounding the indictment, with him claiming that he had been "setup" by deep-state actors. However, Haberman notes that these claims are baseless and have already been thoroughly debunked by law enforcement officials.
The real purpose behind Trump's tirade, according to Haberman, was to create a sense of urgency and panic among his supporters, while also attempting to deflect attention from the seriousness of the charges against him. By attacking the judge and his family, Trump aimed to tap into the emotions of his base, creating a sense of shared grievance and rallying cry.
In essence, Trump's actions represent a classic example of gaslighting, where he attempts to convince his followers that they are being unfairly targeted or wronged, while ignoring the facts and evidence. Haberman highlights that this is a common tactic used by authoritarian leaders to maintain control over their base and avoid accountability for their actions.
Ultimately, Trump's outburst serves as a reminder of the dangers of unchecked power and the erosion of trust in institutions. As Haberman aptly puts it, "the president's behavior at Mar-a-Lago suggests that he is not taking responsibility for his own actions, but rather trying to control the narrative."
Trump thinks he can just rant and rave at a judge like that? It's like, hello, dude, you're in trouble with the law... stop making it up 
. And what really gets me is how he tries to make everyone else look bad while he's the one who's being "setup" by some deep-state actors 
. Like, come on, Donald, we've seen all those conspiracy theories debunked a million times already 
. It's just so pathetic that you're trying to create this drama and panic among your followers to distract from the charges against you 
. And honestly, it's not like anyone's buying it... your base might be drinking the Kool-Aid, but the rest of us can see what's going on 
.
I mean i get it he thinks he's above the law and all but come on the man has been charged with felonies like what is he even going to do now? 
. Like, buddy, we get it, you're upset, but gaslighting isn't gonna cut it.
. It's like, dude, you can't control everything, and sometimes you gotta face the music.
. Trump's behavior is a red flag, and we should be paying attention to it 
.
. Like, I get it, he's got a lot riding on this case and wants to spin it in his favor, but at what cost? 
His attack on the judge and family is just plain scary - who does that?! 
And Haberman's point about gaslighting being a classic tactic for authoritarian leaders... yikes! It's like, we know he's not above the law, but this is getting out of hand. 
. Newsflash: it's not going to work. The whole "deep-state" thing is just a bunch of BS conspiracy theories 
.
. It's like he thinks he can control people's emotions with his words alone 
. Meanwhile, we're all just left to pick up the pieces of a broken democracy 
. The real question is, how far will this go? Will he try to intimidate witnesses or jurors next? 
and honestly i'm like totally not surprised lol he's always been all about control and manipulation 
and now he's resorting to gaslighting his supporters 
like how can u even do that to ppl who looked up to u 
i know some people might be thinking it's just part of his "tough guy" image but newsflash: being a leader means taking responsibility for ur actions, not trying 2 control the narrative 
and btw i'm loving how cnn is calling him out on this