The FBI has launched a shocking raid on the home of Washington Post journalist Hannah Natanson, allegedly in connection to an investigation into government contractor Aurelio Perez-Lugones. However, critics are claiming that the raid was based on a "sham pretext", as the Attorney General's office had previously reversed media protections for journalists.
According to reports, Bondi rescinded Biden-era guidelines that protected reporters from being compelled to disclose their sources or having their records searched. The move was widely seen as an attempt to intimidate journalists and restrict their ability to report on classified information.
Natanson's home was raided by the FBI, but she has claimed that she was not the target of the investigation. Perez-Lugones is accused of illegally retaining classified information, and it appears he may have been a source for Natanson.
Critics argue that Bondi's decision was motivated by her own partisan agenda rather than a genuine concern about national security. The FBI's actions are seen as part of an escalating war on press freedom under the Trump administration.
It has long been acknowledged that many classified documents are unnecessarily retained by government agencies, and it is the responsibility of these agencies to balance national security concerns with the need for transparency.
Despite this, Bondi's move has created a chilling environment for journalists and whistleblowers. Her claims about the dangers of leaks have been discredited, and evidence suggests that she was relying on unsubstantiated claims in order to roll back media protections.
The incident highlights the urgent need for Congress to pass a federal shield bill or reform the Espionage Act so that national security reporters and whistleblowers are not treated like foreign spies.
According to reports, Bondi rescinded Biden-era guidelines that protected reporters from being compelled to disclose their sources or having their records searched. The move was widely seen as an attempt to intimidate journalists and restrict their ability to report on classified information.
Natanson's home was raided by the FBI, but she has claimed that she was not the target of the investigation. Perez-Lugones is accused of illegally retaining classified information, and it appears he may have been a source for Natanson.
Critics argue that Bondi's decision was motivated by her own partisan agenda rather than a genuine concern about national security. The FBI's actions are seen as part of an escalating war on press freedom under the Trump administration.
It has long been acknowledged that many classified documents are unnecessarily retained by government agencies, and it is the responsibility of these agencies to balance national security concerns with the need for transparency.
Despite this, Bondi's move has created a chilling environment for journalists and whistleblowers. Her claims about the dangers of leaks have been discredited, and evidence suggests that she was relying on unsubstantiated claims in order to roll back media protections.
The incident highlights the urgent need for Congress to pass a federal shield bill or reform the Espionage Act so that national security reporters and whistleblowers are not treated like foreign spies.
, like they're literally targeting journalists now... i mean yeah natanson's claim she wasn't the target makes sense but who do you trust anymore? 
the fact that bondi reversed media protections just to silence ppl who wanna report on classified info is super sus 
, like what's really going on here? and what about perez-lugones? was he really a source or was it all just a ruse? 
anyway this whole thing is giving me major "they're watching us" vibes 
and we need ppl in power to stand up for press freedom ASAP 
just saw about this crazy raid on Hannah Natanson's house by the FBI... like, what even is going on here? 
[
.
.
. We need Congress to step up and pass that shield bill ASAP 
.
The current state of media protections in this country is a mess, and it's high time for Congress to step up and take action. The FBI raid on Natanson's home was a clear overreach, and it's only going to embolden more agencies to target journalists who dare to ask tough questions. We need stronger shields for our press, not weaker ones 
And I'm trying to understand why the AG's office would do such a thing, but isn't it kinda obvious that they're trying to silence people and control what we can see and hear? 
And what's up with all these classified documents that are still hanging around, maybe some people shouldn't be working with them at all? 
. This isn't about the press being too loose with classified info, it's about the government trying to control what we can and can't say 
just kidding, kinda... seriously though, what's with all these raids on journalists? can't they just let Natanson do her job without freaking out the whole press corps? and btw, Bondi's gotta be like "oh no, I'm so worried about national security" when really she's just trying to silence dissenting voices 
.