Families of Boat Strike Victims Sue U.S. for "Manifestly Unlawful" Killings
In a shocking turn of events, the families of two Trinidadian men killed in a U.S.-led boat strike on October 14 have filed a lawsuit against the United States government, claiming that their loved ones were victims of "manifestly unlawful" killings.
Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, died when a U.S. Navy ship fired missiles at a boat they were traveling in, off the coast of Trinidad. The incident was part of a broader pattern of attacks on boats by the U.S. military in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, which have resulted in the deaths of at least 126 civilians.
The lawsuit, filed under the Death on the High Seas Act and the Alien Tort Statute, alleges that the U.S. government violated international law and the human rights of the two men. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for wrongful death, extrajudicial killing, and other claims.
"This was a murder," said Steven Watt, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). "These were both homicides. Both men were killed without any due process."
The incident is not an isolated one. The U.S. military has carried out 36 known attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean since September, killing at least 126 civilians. The most recent attack occurred in January, killing two people and leaving one survivor.
Experts say that the strikes are illegal extrajudicial killings because the military is not permitted to deliberately target civilians - even suspected criminals who do not pose an imminent threat of violence.
"Whatever that secret memorandum states, it cannot render the patently illegal killings lawful," said Jonathan Hafetz, a professor at Seton Hall Law School. "People may not simply be gunned down by the government, and the Trump administration's claims to the contrary risk making America a pariah state."
The lawsuit is seen as a significant development in the ongoing debate over U.S. military actions in the Caribbean and Pacific. The Intercept has reported on the attacks and the impact they have had on civilians.
"This is not hyperbole," said Hafetz. "We're seeing a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government."
The families of the two men killed in the boat strike are seeking answers and justice, but their case may be the first to bring attention to the broader issue of extrajudicial killings by the U.S. military.
"We want the truth," said Lenore Burnley, Joseph's mother. "We want to know why our son was killed. We hope that speaking out will help get us some answers and closure."
The lawsuit is being brought in U.S. federal admiralty court under the Death on the High Seas Act, which covers wrongful maritime deaths. The plaintiffs are also seeking claims for extrajudicial killing under the Alien Tort Statute.
The Justice Department has not immediately returned a request for comment about the lawsuit.
In a shocking turn of events, the families of two Trinidadian men killed in a U.S.-led boat strike on October 14 have filed a lawsuit against the United States government, claiming that their loved ones were victims of "manifestly unlawful" killings.
Chad Joseph, 26, and Rishi Samaroo, 41, died when a U.S. Navy ship fired missiles at a boat they were traveling in, off the coast of Trinidad. The incident was part of a broader pattern of attacks on boats by the U.S. military in the Caribbean Sea and Pacific Ocean, which have resulted in the deaths of at least 126 civilians.
The lawsuit, filed under the Death on the High Seas Act and the Alien Tort Statute, alleges that the U.S. government violated international law and the human rights of the two men. The plaintiffs are seeking damages for wrongful death, extrajudicial killing, and other claims.
"This was a murder," said Steven Watt, a senior staff attorney with the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU). "These were both homicides. Both men were killed without any due process."
The incident is not an isolated one. The U.S. military has carried out 36 known attacks on boats in the Caribbean Sea and eastern Pacific Ocean since September, killing at least 126 civilians. The most recent attack occurred in January, killing two people and leaving one survivor.
Experts say that the strikes are illegal extrajudicial killings because the military is not permitted to deliberately target civilians - even suspected criminals who do not pose an imminent threat of violence.
"Whatever that secret memorandum states, it cannot render the patently illegal killings lawful," said Jonathan Hafetz, a professor at Seton Hall Law School. "People may not simply be gunned down by the government, and the Trump administration's claims to the contrary risk making America a pariah state."
The lawsuit is seen as a significant development in the ongoing debate over U.S. military actions in the Caribbean and Pacific. The Intercept has reported on the attacks and the impact they have had on civilians.
"This is not hyperbole," said Hafetz. "We're seeing a full-on authoritarian takeover of the U.S. government."
The families of the two men killed in the boat strike are seeking answers and justice, but their case may be the first to bring attention to the broader issue of extrajudicial killings by the U.S. military.
"We want the truth," said Lenore Burnley, Joseph's mother. "We want to know why our son was killed. We hope that speaking out will help get us some answers and closure."
The lawsuit is being brought in U.S. federal admiralty court under the Death on the High Seas Act, which covers wrongful maritime deaths. The plaintiffs are also seeking claims for extrajudicial killing under the Alien Tort Statute.
The Justice Department has not immediately returned a request for comment about the lawsuit.