US taxpayers have been left with a staggering $10 billion bill for extended paid leave granted to federal workers under the Trump administration, according to an analysis by Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (Peer). This costly strategy, aimed at "government efficiency," resulted in over 154,000 employees being put on paid leave in 2025, accounting for nearly 7% of the federal civilian workforce.
The extended paid leaves were allegedly implemented as part of a broader assault on the federal workforce, with Peer accusing the Trump administration of violating the law and wasting taxpayer money. The organization's senior counsel, Peter Jenkins, describes this approach as "a hell of a way to run a railroad," highlighting the wasteful nature of using taxpayer funds to compensate employees for not working.
Meanwhile, the Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits government spending on employees who should not be on leave, but this provision has been circumvented by the Trump administration's classification system. Peer alleges that this system "totally gut the law," as it deviates from Congress's intended intent and instead creates a separate set of regulations.
The regulatory framework for paid leave is complex, with multiple laws and oversight bodies involved. The lack of clear enforcement mechanisms has created an "accountability black hole," according to Madeline Materna, a Stanford University doctoral student who studies the issue. This complexity makes it challenging to pursue legal action against the administration, with many experts concluding that criminal prosecution is unlikely.
In an attempt to hold the administration accountable, Peer has filed a complaint with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which must determine whether the paid leave program violates the law. If found guilty, agency heads could face penalties, including removal from office and fines. However, the process remains uncertain, with many experts questioning the likelihood of successful enforcement.
The Trump administration's paid leave strategy has left a trail of controversy, with numerous employees being denied access to justice due to the complex regulatory landscape. As one expert notes, "there's clever dancing around the law," which has enabled the administration to avoid accountability for its actions.
The extended paid leaves were allegedly implemented as part of a broader assault on the federal workforce, with Peer accusing the Trump administration of violating the law and wasting taxpayer money. The organization's senior counsel, Peter Jenkins, describes this approach as "a hell of a way to run a railroad," highlighting the wasteful nature of using taxpayer funds to compensate employees for not working.
Meanwhile, the Anti-Deficiency Act prohibits government spending on employees who should not be on leave, but this provision has been circumvented by the Trump administration's classification system. Peer alleges that this system "totally gut
The regulatory framework for paid leave is complex, with multiple laws and oversight bodies involved. The lack of clear enforcement mechanisms has created an "accountability black hole," according to Madeline Materna, a Stanford University doctoral student who studies the issue. This complexity makes it challenging to pursue legal action against the administration, with many experts concluding that criminal prosecution is unlikely.
In an attempt to hold the administration accountable, Peer has filed a complaint with the Government Accountability Office (GAO), which must determine whether the paid leave program violates the law. If found guilty, agency heads could face penalties, including removal from office and fines. However, the process remains uncertain, with many experts questioning the likelihood of successful enforcement.
The Trump administration's paid leave strategy has left a trail of controversy, with numerous employees being denied access to justice due to the complex regulatory landscape. As one expert notes, "there's clever dancing around the law," which has enabled the administration to avoid accountability for its actions.