Did you solve it? Are you as smart as Spock?

Logic Puzzle: The Cookie Conundrum - Can You Crack the Code?

The age-old adage "share is caring" takes a backseat when it comes to this intriguing logic puzzle from World Logic Day. Three friends, Andy, Bea, and Celine, find themselves in a cookie jar with ten sweet treats. The catch? They can't communicate or form alliances, and their ultimate goal is to end up with as many cookies as possible while avoiding the most and least number of cookies.

The key condition here: no one wants to be left with the most cookies or finish at the bottom of the pack. But they also want to maximize their cookie stash. So, how do they play this cookie game?

Let's analyze Andy's options. If he takes more than 4 cookies, he risks ending up with the most - a situation he'd rather avoid. Similarly, taking just 4 cookies won't cut it, as that would leave him in the middle and fail condition 1.

However, if Andy takes 4 cookies, Bea is faced with a tough decision. Taking fewer than 3 cookies would put her at risk of ending up with the least, while taking more could secure her spot in the middle. Logic dictates she should aim for the sweet spot - 3 cookies.

Bea, realizing this, decides to take all the remaining cookies, leaving Celine with a paltry amount (0). Meanwhile, Andy's calculated move has secured his place at the top of the cookie heap, albeit a solitary one.

So, who wins? Andy, with 4 cookies, and Bea, taking control of the jar, each secure their spot in this game of cookie survival. It's not the most equitable outcome, but it's certainly a pragmatic one.

Will you be as clever as Spock, or will this puzzle leave you feeling... illogical?
 
This whole thing is rigged from the start πŸ€”. Bea takes all the rest and leaves Celine with zero? That's not teamwork, that's ruthless cookie thievery πŸ˜’. And Andy thinks he's some kind of genius by taking the minimum amount and screwing over his friends? Not impressed, dude πŸ‘Ž. The only way this works out is if everyone's a master manipulator, which is just a nice way of saying "we're all screwed" πŸ€•. I wouldn't trust any of them to get me a cookie without a fight πŸͺ.
 
Ugh, this whole thing just feels like a recipe for disaster πŸͺπŸ˜’. I mean, can't these friends just work together to get the most cookies possible instead of trying to outsmart each other? It's like they're more focused on winning than enjoying their snacks.

And what's with Bea taking all the remaining cookies? That's just harsh, dude. Celine ends up with nothing, which is just ridiculous 🀯. I don't think this is a game worth playing. It's all about individual gain and screwing your friends over. Not exactly the kind of vibe I'm looking for in a cookie jar competition.

And can we talk about how unbalanced this whole situation is? One person gets 4 cookies, another takes everything else, and the third person ends up with none πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ. It's just not right.
 
idk about this cookie conundrum tho πŸͺπŸ˜’ Andy's strategy seems sketchy at best - taking all 4 cookies to secure his spot but leaving Bea and Celine with barely anything? That doesn't seem super fair 😐 and kinda kinda sounds like cheating... plus what if one of them was having an off day and could only grab a couple πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ I mean, can we really say this is the most logical or reasonable solution here?
 
omg I'm literally obsessed with logic puzzles like this 🀯! This cookie conundrum is SO cleverly designed πŸͺπŸ˜‚. Andy's move to take 4 cookies was pure genius πŸ’‘, and Bea's strategy to snag all the remaining cookies was pure brilliance πŸ’β€β™€οΈ. But let's be real, it's not exactly a fair game πŸ€•. I mean, Celine got stuck with ZERO cookies? That's just cruel 😩. Still, kudos to Andy and Bea for outsmarting each other! πŸ‘ Can we get more puzzles like this on World Logic Day? Please? 😍
 
omg i just got out of bed and now i'm thinking about cookies lol idk how they came up with this puzzle it sounds kinda mean to leave celine with 0 cookies but at the same time i guess that's just part of the game lol what if there were more than 3 ppl in the jar? would the strategy change or would it still be all about bea and andy taking control? and btw who wants to end up with the most cookies anyway? sounds kinda awkward πŸͺπŸ˜’
 
πŸͺ😐 i dont think its about being clever, its about making the right move when u gotta protect urself. Bea played smart by taking all the leftovers & Andy took 4 to avoid the most. cant say im happy about it but thats logic for u πŸ€”
 
Ugh, who needs friends when you've got cookies πŸͺπŸ‘€? This game is basically a social experiment gone wrong - 'share is caring' becomes "do whatever it takes to win". Bea's move was super shady, low-key trying to sabotage Celine. And Andy, the winner, just coasted on his conservative choice... kinda like how I coast through life πŸ˜‚. Can we solve this puzzle or do we need a cookie-fueled intervention? πŸͺπŸ’‘
 
omg u guys i was thinkin bout dis same thing yesterday i was at my aunties house and we had these cookies in a jar and i was like "aha! i can do better than her" so i took 6 but then i saw my cuz takin all the rest and i was like "whoa hold up" i don't think that's fair but at the same time if i take less i might end up last lol what a cookie conundrum indeed
 
Ugh, fam 🀯 I'm telling u, there's more to dis whole cookie conundrum thang than meets the eye. Think about it: Bea just takes all da remaining cookies, basically robs Celine blind πŸ˜’. That don't sound right, like a classic case of unequal distribution of the loot. And what's wit' Andy gettin' 4 and takin' da top spot? Is dis some kinda setup to test our logical skills or somethin'? πŸ€”
 
omg i love these kinda puzzles its like a fun little math problem πŸ€”πŸ’‘ and i think what makes this one tricky is that everyone has to do their own thing without knowing what others are gonna do. like if Bea doesn't take all the remaining cookies, she's still at risk of ending up with the least... ugh my brain hurts trying to visualize all the different scenarios 🀯 but yeah i think Andy and Bea played a pretty good game of strategy here πŸ‘
 
idk about this cookie thing tho πŸͺπŸ€” i mean its like they gotta play this game where they're all tryna screw each other over but at the same time wanna win lol what's good with that kinda thinking?! and whats up with Bea just taking ALL the remaining cookies tho? seems a bit sneaky to me πŸ€‘
 
omg, i just got back from the most amazing road trip with my family πŸš—πŸŒž and we saw the craziest sunsets at the beach. like, the sky turns all these colors and it's just so beautiful... anyway, back to this cookie thingy. idk about max/min cookies being a big deal but can you imagine if they had like, vegan or gluten-free options? that would add another whole level of complexity πŸͺπŸ€”

anyway, i was thinking, what if they had more than 10 cookies in the jar initially? would it change how they strategize? and what about if they could take out cookies mid-game to sabotage each other? wouldn't that just make everything a lot more... drama-filled πŸ€·β€β™€οΈπŸͺ
 
omg what a crazy game 🀯 i'm loving how Andy outsmarted everyone by taking the minimum to avoid being last and Bea got all the leftovers but still managed to win πŸ€‘ can we get more puzzles like this tho?? i wanna see if i can be as clever as Spock too πŸ’‘
 
omg u gotta love how Bea just straight up took all the cookies lol πŸͺπŸ€‘ then again, kinda harsh on Celine, but what r u gonna do? it's a cookie jar, after all πŸ˜‚ i mean, Andy got lucky and secured 4, but Bea's move was so calculated... i'm low-key impressed 🀩
 
omg i love how this puzzle plays with people's assumptions 🀯 like who wins is actually dependent on what each person does in that specific moment. its all about making the best of a bad situation and not wanting to end up at the bottom or top. for me, this puzzle seems kinda realistic in real life too - we've all been in situations where we had to make tough choices and not everyone gets a happy ending 😐
 
I wonder if we're just playing out our own versions of this cookie conundrum in life πŸͺ... trying to balance individual gain with the need for others to succeed. It's like, do we really want to be the ones who take all the cookies and leave others with none, or can we find a way to share the spoils fairly? But then again, what even is fair in a game where logic is king and we're just trying to outsmart each other? Maybe that's the real question...
 
I just saw this thread and I gotta say, it was a tough one. I mean, I get why Andy did what he did, but at the same time, Bea seems like a total cookie hoarder πŸͺπŸ˜’. But in all fairness, it's not like they had any other options, right? And honestly, I think this puzzle is more about how you prioritize your goals than anything else. Like, who needs equality when you can have 4 cookies and be the top dog? πŸ•πŸ‘‘
 
I gotta say, this whole cookie conundrum thing is a bit of a head-scratcher 🀯. I mean, on the surface, it seems like Andy's got a solid plan with the 4 cookies - avoid being left with the most and Bea gets to secure her spot in the middle. But then you think about it some more, and maybe taking 3 cookies would've been a safer bet for Bea? πŸ€” I don't know, man, it just doesn't feel right that Andy ends up with all the cookies and nobody's really happy with their lot πŸͺ😐.

I guess what I'm saying is, while it's clever in a weird way, it's not exactly the most satisfying outcome for everyone involved πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ.
 
Back
Top