The Detroit Lions' system failed to deliver a consistent performance throughout the season, ultimately leading to their fourth-place finish in the NFC North. Despite starting with a loss and then erupting against the Chicago Bears, the team's overall strategy was unable to sustain its high level of play. The problem lay not only in injuries but also in the inability to protect Jared Goff consistently, allowing the defense to struggle.
When the run game stopped being a foundation, Detroit struggled to find its footing. The Lions' offense relied heavily on timing and sequencing, which was disrupted by changes in the coaching staff. Taylor Decker's comments about playing through pain and constant treatment highlighted the physical toll of his season, affecting the team's ability to protect Goff.
The defense also struggled, regressing from seventh in scoring defense last season to 23rd this year. The Lions allowed an average of 24.8 points per game, a significant increase from their previous year. While Aidan Hutchinson showed flashes of brilliance late in the season, the team's overall pass rush was inconsistent.
The season slipped away due to Detroit's inability to consistently play its designed system. With nine wins and eight losses, the Lions started the year thinking they were built for bigger things. However, their fragile system allowed them to struggle when injuries occurred or the script went sideways.
For improvement, the Lions need a healthier and deeper offensive line plan that does not collapse when key veterans are compromised. They also require more reliable pressure creation, both in terms of personnel and scheme. A run game foundation is crucial for maintaining an identity, as the team has shown in the past when it can control games on the ground.
Ultimately, the Lions' system is fragile, and this fragility will be punished by the NFL over 17 weeks. The next step is to admit that their system needs adaptation and build a plan that survives the challenges of the season.
When the run game stopped being a foundation, Detroit struggled to find its footing. The Lions' offense relied heavily on timing and sequencing, which was disrupted by changes in the coaching staff. Taylor Decker's comments about playing through pain and constant treatment highlighted the physical toll of his season, affecting the team's ability to protect Goff.
The defense also struggled, regressing from seventh in scoring defense last season to 23rd this year. The Lions allowed an average of 24.8 points per game, a significant increase from their previous year. While Aidan Hutchinson showed flashes of brilliance late in the season, the team's overall pass rush was inconsistent.
The season slipped away due to Detroit's inability to consistently play its designed system. With nine wins and eight losses, the Lions started the year thinking they were built for bigger things. However, their fragile system allowed them to struggle when injuries occurred or the script went sideways.
For improvement, the Lions need a healthier and deeper offensive line plan that does not collapse when key veterans are compromised. They also require more reliable pressure creation, both in terms of personnel and scheme. A run game foundation is crucial for maintaining an identity, as the team has shown in the past when it can control games on the ground.
Ultimately, the Lions' system is fragile, and this fragility will be punished by the NFL over 17 weeks. The next step is to admit that their system needs adaptation and build a plan that survives the challenges of the season.