A majority of Chicago's City Council members have signed a letter expressing their opposition to Mayor Brandon Johnson's proposed corporate head tax, a move seen as an attempt to curb income inequality. The $21-per-employee head tax is set to generate $100 million annually and was part of the mayor's plan to "challenge the ultra-rich" and corporations to pay their fair share.
The letter, signed by 27 Council members including key leaders from the Black Caucus and Mayor Johnson's leadership team, highlights concerns that reinstating the head tax could have devastating effects on hiring, job creation, and making Chicago less competitive. The signatories expressed fears that the tax would push employers outside city limits, thereby discouraging businesses to operate within the city.
In addition, the letter criticized the mayor's reliance on debt financing for operating expenses, particularly the use of $166 million in firefighter back pay, which was repaid over a three-year period. The Council members believe such practices undermine long-term fiscal stability.
The opposition comes at a time when Chicago is facing a budget stalemate, with the City Council previously rejecting Mayor Johnson's proposed property tax increase. This led to the mayor cobbled together an alternative package of taxes and fees, including additional speed cameras.
Business lobbyists who circulated the letter initially claimed that Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Committee Chair Daniel La Spata was on board, but he later clarified that he had not signed on to it. The Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce has denounced the head tax as a "job killer," while Gov. JB Pritzker has expressed similar criticism.
The opposition from key stakeholders suggests that Mayor Johnson still faces significant challenges in implementing his progressive tax package. The mayor's office remains committed to finding alternative revenue streams, however, and is urging Council members to reconsider their stance on the head tax.
The letter, signed by 27 Council members including key leaders from the Black Caucus and Mayor Johnson's leadership team, highlights concerns that reinstating the head tax could have devastating effects on hiring, job creation, and making Chicago less competitive. The signatories expressed fears that the tax would push employers outside city limits, thereby discouraging businesses to operate within the city.
In addition, the letter criticized the mayor's reliance on debt financing for operating expenses, particularly the use of $166 million in firefighter back pay, which was repaid over a three-year period. The Council members believe such practices undermine long-term fiscal stability.
The opposition comes at a time when Chicago is facing a budget stalemate, with the City Council previously rejecting Mayor Johnson's proposed property tax increase. This led to the mayor cobbled together an alternative package of taxes and fees, including additional speed cameras.
Business lobbyists who circulated the letter initially claimed that Pedestrian and Traffic Safety Committee Chair Daniel La Spata was on board, but he later clarified that he had not signed on to it. The Chicagoland Chamber of Commerce has denounced the head tax as a "job killer," while Gov. JB Pritzker has expressed similar criticism.
The opposition from key stakeholders suggests that Mayor Johnson still faces significant challenges in implementing his progressive tax package. The mayor's office remains committed to finding alternative revenue streams, however, and is urging Council members to reconsider their stance on the head tax.
. I mean, $21 per employee might not sound like a lot, but it adds up when you're talking about the whole city 
. And I get that Mayor Johnson wants to tackle income inequality, but if it's gonna push businesses out of the city limits, that's just not fair 
. What's next, are they gonna raise taxes on food and housing too? 
It seems like we're just piling more debt on the city without a solid plan for paying it off 
. And what about all those extra speed cameras? That's just gonna scare people off from coming to Chicago in the first place 
. Maybe instead of head tax, they should focus on finding ways to boost wages and create jobs that don't rely on taxing small businesses 
.
. I mean, it's a decent idea – curbing income inequality, all that jazz 
.
. The mayor's got a good heart, I'll give him that 
, but he needs to find a way to balance progress with practicality. Debt financing? Come on... that's just borrowing trouble 
.
. Can't they just work together for once?
! I'm thinking, like, what if it's not that bad? I mean, $21 per employee doesn't sound too harsh, but apparently, some people think it's gonna be a total disaster 
. If it pushes businesses out of the city, that's defo not what we need right now, fam 
! mayor brandon johnson is tryna pass dis corporate head tax but like 27 council members are straight up opposed to it 
. its like, can't he just stick to a budget? 
. The mayor thinks its a way 2 get rich corps 2 pay their fare share, but probs just pushin em outta the city 
.
. business lobbyists r always talkin bout "job killer" but its all about da benjamins 
. its gonna be intresting to see wat happens nxt 
like what if Chicago can't even figure out how to pay its bills without taxing all these big corps? 
I don't get why they can't find a middle ground or something. It's like, Chicago needs money, and corporations need to pay up... but at what cost? 
