Canada's Prime Minister Mark Carney has unveiled a multibillion-dollar investment package aimed at boosting the country's competitiveness, but critics argue that his "nation-building" programme falls short on its promise to transform Canada for the better.
The $56 billion plan includes a string of resource-based projects such as mines and natural gas exports, which will supposedly position Canada as an energy superpower. However, experts say that these initiatives largely favour the existing economic status quo, neglecting projects that could have a more significant impact on everyday Canadians' lives.
"We're investing in being a resource economy," said Shoshanna Saxe, a professor of civil engineering at the University of Toronto. "And I don't think that's wrong, but it feels like we're missing an opportunity to invest in something new and forward-looking."
Carney's government has opted to prioritize projects with faster returns over those that could lead to more transformative changes. For instance, the proposed power line in British Columbia is expected to secure significant private sector investments, but critics argue that similar infrastructure upgrades are desperately needed elsewhere.
"The signal the government is sending is that Canada is a resource economy," Saxe noted. "And I don't think that's wrong, but it feels like we're not pushing hard enough on what could be game-changers."
One area where Carney's programme falls short is in addressing Canada's infrastructure deficit. With significant gaps in water systems, bridges, public transit, and housing, the prime minister's focus on resource extraction seems out of touch with the everyday concerns of Canadians.
"We're not asking you to engage in changing the basic way Canada works," Saxe said. "We're saying we're going to continue to invest in the old strengths of Canada. But you're still left wondering what is possible."
The lack of investment in these critical areas raises questions about Carney's commitment to creating a more sustainable and equitable future for Canadians. While his government touts its nation-building programme as transformative, many experts believe that it fails to address the pressing needs of the country.
The $56 billion plan includes a string of resource-based projects such as mines and natural gas exports, which will supposedly position Canada as an energy superpower. However, experts say that these initiatives largely favour the existing economic status quo, neglecting projects that could have a more significant impact on everyday Canadians' lives.
"We're investing in being a resource economy," said Shoshanna Saxe, a professor of civil engineering at the University of Toronto. "And I don't think that's wrong, but it feels like we're missing an opportunity to invest in something new and forward-looking."
Carney's government has opted to prioritize projects with faster returns over those that could lead to more transformative changes. For instance, the proposed power line in British Columbia is expected to secure significant private sector investments, but critics argue that similar infrastructure upgrades are desperately needed elsewhere.
"The signal the government is sending is that Canada is a resource economy," Saxe noted. "And I don't think that's wrong, but it feels like we're not pushing hard enough on what could be game-changers."
One area where Carney's programme falls short is in addressing Canada's infrastructure deficit. With significant gaps in water systems, bridges, public transit, and housing, the prime minister's focus on resource extraction seems out of touch with the everyday concerns of Canadians.
"We're not asking you to engage in changing the basic way Canada works," Saxe said. "We're saying we're going to continue to invest in the old strengths of Canada. But you're still left wondering what is possible."
The lack of investment in these critical areas raises questions about Carney's commitment to creating a more sustainable and equitable future for Canadians. While his government touts its nation-building programme as transformative, many experts believe that it fails to address the pressing needs of the country.