Bluesky experiments with dislikes and 'social proximity' to improve conversations

Bluesky, the social platform behind Bluesky, has been experimenting with new features designed to improve conversations on its site. The company's latest innovation is a dislike button that allows users to signal which posts they'd rather not see in their Discover feed.

The experiment is part of a broader initiative by Bluesky to build a system that recognizes and values the social connections we make online, essentially creating a "social neighborhood" based on people with whom we already interact or would likely get along. By prioritizing replies from users within this network, Bluesky aims to foster more relevant, familiar, and less contentious conversations.

To refine its approach, Bluesky is beta-testing the dislike button in private, aiming to better understand what kinds of posts users prefer to avoid seeing. However, this new feature could also impact reply rankings, potentially affecting the visibility of posts from other users within the same social neighborhood.

In an effort to enhance user experience without limiting interactions with just those who follow us, Bluesky is tweaking its Reply button as well. The updated feature would display the full thread before initiating a response, rather than launching into a new blank post. This change comes alongside a revised model for detecting problematic replies.

The company hopes that these tweaks will improve the overall social climate by making conversations feel more connected and less confrontational. However, some critics have raised concerns about the "social neighborhood" concept, suggesting it could reinforce users in their online echo chambers rather than addressing deeper moderation issues.

Bluesky's efforts to provide users with more control over their experience are seen as a positive step, while its approach to fostering social connections raises questions about the potential for increased polarization. As the company continues to refine its features, it will be essential to strike a balance between promoting meaningful interactions and maintaining a respectful online environment.
 
I'm low-key loving this new dislike button feature on Bluesky! πŸ€— It's all about giving users more control over what they see in their Discover feed, right? And I think it's dope that they're trying to create these "social neighborhoods" based on people we interact with online. It's like, who doesn't want to see posts from folks who vibe with them, you know?

But at the same time, I'm a bit concerned about how this could affect reply rankings and visibility of other users' posts. That's like, super important for building community and stuff. 😬 And some people are right to question whether this "social neighborhood" concept might just reinforce online echo chambers... that would be no good, fam.

Still, I think Bluesky is on the right track with these tweaks, especially with the updated Reply button feature. Displaying full threads before responding is like, so much easier and less frustrating than launching into a blank post. πŸ€¦β€β™€οΈ And the revised model for detecting problematic replies? Yeah, that's a major win.

It's all about striking a balance between promoting meaningful interactions and maintaining a respectful online environment... that's what I'm rooting for! πŸ‘
 
I'm not sure about this new dislike button on Bluesky... I mean, I get what they're trying to do - create a more personalized experience for users. But isn't that just gonna make the algorithm even more biased? Like, what if I follow someone who's always posting about politics and I don't wanna see that stuff anymore, but because we interact online, Bluesky thinks we're part of some "social neighborhood" together... πŸ€”

And I'm all for having more control over our experience, but isn't this just a band-aid solution? We need to address the real issues with online moderation and echo chambers. Can't we just get rid of those toxic comments instead of making it harder to report them or hiding them from us altogether?

I guess what I'm saying is that I wanna see more nuance in how Bluesky approaches this stuff. They're on the right track, but they need to be careful not to make things worse... πŸ™…β€β™‚οΈ
 
I'm loving this new feature from Bluesky 🀩! I mean, who hasn't had to scroll through a bunch of posts that aren't really for them? It's like they're trying to force us into this never-ending feed of stuff we don't want to see πŸ˜‚. But seriously, having the option to "dislike" certain posts could really help us curate our online experience and avoid some of that unnecessary drama.

I'm also super down for the new Reply button feature πŸ™Œ. Full threads? Yes, please! No more feeling like we're starting from scratch every time we respond to a post. And I love how Bluesky is trying to tackle the whole "social neighborhood" thing. It's all about creating spaces where people can feel more connected and less judged, right?

Of course, there are some concerns out there that this might just reinforce online echo chambers or something πŸ€”. But I think it's awesome that Bluesky is listening and trying to make these changes. Maybe we'll see a whole new era of respectful online interactions πŸ’–!
 
I don’t usually comment but I gotta say, this new dislike button thingy from Bluesky is kinda interesting πŸ€”. I mean, on one hand, I love the idea of not seeing all that negativity in my feed, it's like having a mental filter ✨. But at the same time, I worry about how it could be used to just hide stuff from people who don't agree with us 😳.

I think what bothers me is that this whole "social neighborhood" thing sounds kinda like they're trying to create these little online communities where everyone agrees and never clashes 🀝. And that's not really the internet, right? I don't want to see my posts only shared with people who are just gonna say yes all day πŸ’―.

And what about those of us who don't have a "social neighborhood" to share our thoughts with? What if we're just left out in the cold? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ
 
I mean, can you blame them? Like, who hasn't scrolled through their feed and thought "ugh, this is exactly what I don't need right now"? 🀯 The dislike button is like, the ultimate sanity-saver. But at the same time, I'm not sure it's gonna solve all our problems... I mean, if we're being real, some people are just gonna use it to avoid talking to their aunt about her cat. 🐈 Anyway, kudos to Bluesky for trying to mix things up and prioritize user experience. Now let's see how they balance that with keeping the drama to a minimum... fingers crossed! πŸ˜‚
 
omg i dont get how this is supposed to work πŸ€” like if i see a post from someone i follow but not really talk to in real life, why wouldnt they just post something stupid anyway? i mean, whats the point of making me see less stuff thats gonna annoy me? shouldn't it just show me posts that are all chill and nice and fun? lol also what kinda moderation issues r they even talking about? πŸ˜‚
 
This dislike button thing is kinda cool I guess... I mean who doesn't want to avoid some toxic trash in their feed? πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ But what if it just creates more echo chambers? Like, I follow people but they're still gonna see all this other drama and be like "ugh" πŸ˜’. And what's with the new Reply button feature? That sounds super helpful for avoiding unnecessary threads... or is it just gonna make me think twice before responding every time? πŸ€”
 
I wonder if this new dislike button is just a Band-Aid solution to a much deeper issue – how do we truly define what's "contentious" or "less desirable" in our conversations? Are we really just filtering out the noise, or are we also filtering out the perspectives that challenge us?

And what does it say about us as individuals when we feel the need to control who sees our posts and what kind of content we're exposed to? Is this a sign of a desire for comfort and safety, or is it a cry for help – a recognition that we're struggling to cope with the complexities of human interaction in the digital realm?

The more I think about it, the more I'm convinced that Bluesky's efforts to create a "social neighborhood" are just the beginning of a much larger conversation – one that requires us to confront our own biases and assumptions head-on. πŸ’­
 
omg i think this new dislike button is gonna change the game on bluesky! 🀯 like how they're trying to create this "social neighborhood" thingy, i'm all for it lol i mean who doesn't wanna see posts from ppl they actually vibe with? but at the same time, gotta worry about echo chambers and stuff... don't wanna be stuck in a never-ending loop of similar thoughts πŸ€ͺ
 
omg 🀯 just heard about bluesky's new dislike button πŸ’” i think its a great idea to give users more control over what they see on their feed πŸ‘€ but at the same time, i'm worried it could make echo chambers even worse πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ and reinforce those super annoying online debates πŸ—£οΈ we need to make sure these features promote real conversations not just avoiding certain ppl πŸ˜” anyway, love that bluesky's trying to improve user experience πŸ’•
 
πŸ€” People don't change because we want them to... they change because we are no longer interested in being around people who do not share our values. ~ Barbara Jordan 😊
 
πŸ€” I gotta say, I'm both hyped & worried about this new dislike button πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ. On one hand, giving users more control over their feed is a great idea πŸ’‘, especially if it means less noise from folks we don't really care about. But on the other hand, I fear that it might create these super curated neighborhoods where only our closest online friends show up πŸ“ˆ... which sounds kinda nice but also super isolating 🚫. What if people start to avoid engaging with others outside their network? πŸ’”
 
πŸ€” I'm not sure about this new dislike button, but at least it's something they're trying. I mean, who hasn't scrolled through their Discover feed and thought "ugh, that's just noise"? But the part that really got me is how they're building these "social neighborhoods" – isn't that just code for creating more echo chambers? Like, aren't we already dealing with enough online echo chambers as it is? I'm not saying it's a bad idea, but we need to make sure we're not just perpetuating the same old problems. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ
 
I get why Bluesky wants to try this out - we all hate seeing the same old annoying posts in our feeds 🀯. But at the same time, I'm worried that it might push people even further into their own little bubbles... like, what if my social neighborhood only shows me stuff from ppl I already agree with? That's when conversations can get really stale πŸ“š. And yeah, let's be real, dislike buttons can always lead to a whole new set of problems πŸ‘€.
 
I'm low-key excited about Bluesky's new dislike button πŸ€—... I mean, who doesn't want to avoid seeing annoying posts in their feed? But, at the same time, I'm a little concerned that it could create more echo chambers 😬. Like, what if users just end up following people they already agree with and never encounter opposing views? That's just not gonna help us grow as individuals πŸ€”.

On the other hand, I think Bluesky is on the right track by giving users more control over their experience πŸ‘. It's all about finding that balance between promoting meaningful interactions and keeping things respectful online πŸ’¬. And hey, if it means reducing the amount of toxic comments in our feeds, then I'm totally here for it πŸ™Œ!
 
I'm so stoked we're getting a dislike button on Bluesky πŸ™„. I mean, who doesn't love hiding from content that's actually worth engaging with? It's not like we need more ways to avoid being exposed to new ideas or perspectives. Can you imagine the social connections we'll make by only interacting with people who share our exact views? Sounds like a total blast party πŸŽ‰.
 
I gotta say, I'm all about giving Bluesky props for trying to make our online spaces more chill πŸŒˆπŸ’•. The new dislike button thing seems like a good idea - who doesn't want to avoid seeing some drama in their feed? πŸ˜’ But at the same time, I've got some concerns about how it could impact other users. Like, what if people start using it to silence marginalized voices or hide out from respectful conversations?

The Reply feature update sounds awesome tho! 🀩 Displaying full threads before you respond is like, so much more considerate πŸ’‘. And I'm down for Bluesky trying to promote social connections - we do need more meaningful online interactions in our lives 😊.

But I think it's time for us to have a bigger conversation about what constitutes a "social neighborhood" πŸ€”. Are they just gonna use it to reinforce existing biases or create new ones? That's the part that gets me πŸ’”
 
Ugh, another platform trying to force us into this "social neighborhood" thing πŸ€–β€β™‚οΈ. Like, can't they just let me see whatever I want and not care about my online friends? πŸ˜’ This dislike button is just gonna lead to more algorithms deciding what's good for me and less of my control over the conversation. And don't even get me started on how it might impact replies from people outside of my "neighborhood" πŸ€”. But at least they're trying, I guess πŸ‘. The full thread before a response is a nice touch, though πŸ’‘. Maybe Bluesky's just trying to tame the wild west of online discourse πŸ˜….
 
I'm not sure I'm sold on this whole "social neighborhood" thing πŸ€”. I mean, don't get me wrong, it sounds cool in theory, but how do we even define who's part of our "neighborhood"? Is it based on interests? Friends? Who knows? It feels like another layer of complexity to navigate online. And what about people who don't have a lot of friends or connections online? Are they gonna be left out? πŸ€·β€β™€οΈ

I do think the new dislike button is a good idea though, especially if it helps reduce all the noise on my feed πŸ“Š. Less content that makes me want to scream or ignore would definitely make my day better. But I'm still worried about the reply rankings and how that might affect users who aren't part of our "neighborhood". Can we really trust Bluesky to get this stuff right? πŸ’―
 
Back
Top