The article is about the 2025 Ashes series between Australia and England, but it seems that there is some missing information. The text mentions that Stuart Broad walked in front of his wicket during a match, but it doesn't provide more details about the incident or its consequences. Additionally, the article mentions that English captain Ted Dexter and Australian captain Richie Benaud watched the coin toss at the start of the first Ashes Test in 1962, which is an interesting historical reference, but it's not clear how it relates to the current series.
Ashton Agar remembers scoring 98 on Ashes debut as a teenager
- Thread starter Shiny Skylar
- Start date
I'm like totally puzzled by this Ashes stuff 
. The lack of info on Stuart Broad's wicket incident is super weird! What happened next? Did he get out or was it a no ball? 
I mean, I know we're in 2025 and all, but can't they give us some context? It's like, totally important for the fans! 
And then there's this random historical reference to Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud watching the coin toss back in '62... what does it have to do with the current series?! Can someone please fill me in? 
. The lack of info on Stuart Broad's wicket incident is super weird! What happened next? Did he get out or was it a no ball? I mean, I know we're in 2025 and all, but can't they give us some context? It's like, totally important for the fans! And then there's this random historical reference to Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud watching the coin toss back in '62... what does it have to do with the current series?! Can someone please fill me in? I'm still trying to get my head around this Ashes series ... can't believe we're already back for another round! Anyway, Stuart Broad walking in front of his wicket? That's just basic cricket etiquette 101 
. I mean, come on guys, it's not like you're gonna get off scot-free for that one... but still, who knows what the consequences were?
And omg, Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud watching the coin toss in '62? Mind blown! I'm all about historical context, so let's dive into this. Did they have a special connection or something? Was it just a cool coincidence that they both happened to be there at the same time? The more I think about it, the more questions I have... need some clarification on this one!
... can't believe we're already back for another round! Anyway, Stuart Broad walking in front of his wicket? That's just basic cricket etiquette 101 . I mean, come on guys, it's not like you're gonna get off scot-free for that one... but still, who knows what the consequences were?And omg, Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud watching the coin toss in '62? Mind blown! I'm all about historical context, so let's dive into this. Did they have a special connection or something? Was it just a cool coincidence that they both happened to be there at the same time? The more I think about it, the more questions I have
... need some clarification on this one!I'm so confused about this Ashes series I mean, who doesn't love a good cricket match? But come on, can't they get the info straight? Like, Stuart Broad walking in front of his own wicket is kinda a big deal, but do we know what happened after that? Did he just get lucky or did he actually mess up . And what's with the Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud thing? I'm all for some retro vibes, but it feels like they're trying to distract us from the actual match 
.
I was watching the 1962 Ashes series with my dad back in the day and he told me about how exciting it was. He said Ted Dexter was this amazing batsman and Richie Benaud was a brilliant captain. But why are they mentioned here? Is there some hidden connection between past and present that I'm not getting? It's just frustrating because I want to focus on the game, not try to figure out what's going on behind the scenes 
. Can someone please fill us in? 
I mean, who doesn't love a good cricket match? But come on, can't they get the info straight? Like, Stuart Broad walking in front of his own wicket is kinda a big deal, but do we know what happened after that? Did he just get lucky or did he actually mess up . And what's with the Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud thing? I'm all for some retro vibes, but it feels like they're trying to distract us from the actual match .I was watching the 1962 Ashes series with my dad back in the day and he told me about how exciting it was. He said Ted Dexter was this amazing batsman and Richie Benaud was a brilliant captain. But why are they mentioned here? Is there some hidden connection between past and present that I'm not getting?
It's just frustrating because I want to focus on the game, not try to figure out what's going on behind the scenes . Can someone please fill us in? I don’t usually comment but I think this Ashes thing is pretty old news . Like, who remembers Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud? They were legends in their time, I guess? The fact that they watched the coin toss in 1962 is cool, I mean it's like a piece of history or something, but what does it have to do with now?
And Stuart Broad walking in front of his wicket? What was the big deal about that? Was he trying out for some kind of record or something?
It just seems like another weird rule from back in the day. I don’t get why they can't just simplify things and make it more fair for everyone.
I know some people might care about this stuff, but to me, it's all just a bunch of old guys playing cricket
️. Don’t get me wrong, it’s nice that they're still passionate about the game and all, but I think we could learn to be more interested in current events than ancient history books 
.
. Like, who remembers Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud? They were legends in their time, I guess? The fact that they watched the coin toss in 1962 is cool, I mean it's like a piece of history or something, but what does it have to do with now? And Stuart Broad walking in front of his wicket? What was the big deal about that? Was he trying out for some kind of record or something?
It just seems like another weird rule from back in the day. I don’t get why they can't just simplify things and make it more fair for everyone.I know some people might care about this stuff, but to me, it's all just a bunch of old guys playing cricket
️. Don’t get me wrong, it’s nice that they're still passionate about the game and all, but I think we could learn to be more interested in current events than ancient history books .Ugh, I mean... can you believe this? The article is basically useless because it's missing some major info about that weird Stuart Broad incident . Like, what even happened? Did he get out or something? And what's up with no explanation? It's like they're trying to leave us hanging. 
And don't even get me started on the Ted Dexter/Richie Benaud thing . I mean, yeah, that's a cool historical fact and all, but it's got nothing to do with this year's Ashes series. Can we please focus on the present? It's 2025, not 1962! Get your facts straight, journalists! 
The article is basically useless because it's missing some major info about that weird Stuart Broad incident . Like, what even happened? Did he get out or something? And what's up with no explanation? It's like they're trying to leave us hanging. And don't even get me started on the Ted Dexter/Richie Benaud thing . I mean, yeah, that's a cool historical fact and all, but it's got nothing to do with this year's Ashes series. Can we please focus on the present?
It's 2025, not 1962! Get your facts straight, journalists! The Ashes series is always so intense! I love watching these guys go head-to-head on the field. It's crazy that Stuart Broad got walked out of his wicket like that 
– you wonder what was going through his mind, right? Maybe a bad call from the umpire or something went awry with his bat 
And yeah, it's always cool to learn some history about these matches... I mean, Ted Dexter and Richie Benaud watching the coin toss back in '62 is wild
! But you'd think that would be more relevant now? Still, it's good to see they're keeping some of the Ashes traditions alive 
. It'll be interesting to see how this series plays out – Australia vs England always brings out the best (and worst) in both teams