UAE admits mistake in backing Sudan's RSF militia amid growing criticism over its role in fueling the country's ongoing conflict. The country's senior diplomatic envoy, Anwar Gargash, acknowledged that the UAE and other nations had been wrong not to impose sanctions on those responsible for the 2021 coup, which led to the current civil war.
The UAE's backing of the RSF militia has come under intense scrutiny following reports of mass killings in El Fasher. While the UAE has condemned the atrocities, it has also shifted blame onto the army's failure to compromise. Critics argue that the Gulf state has a responsibility to take action against its proxies and that it is too little, too late.
The RSF militia has been linked to ethnic cleansing and other human rights abuses in Darfur. The UAE's relationship with the group's leader, Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, or Hemedti, has also raised concerns over the country's involvement in fueling the conflict.
The Gulf state's interest in Sudan is largely driven by its strategic location on the Red Sea and its potential to secure access to gold reserves, which are a significant source of revenue for the UAE. However, critics argue that this interest has been pursued at the expense of human rights and stability in the region.
As the conflict continues, the international community is calling on the UAE to take action to resolve the crisis. The US hopes that Sudan's two key external players, Egypt and the UAE, will work together to press their proxies into a ceasefire. However, so far, talks have been unable to reach a breakthrough, suggesting that further engagement may be needed.
The joint statement by the Quad – comprising the US, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE – on September 12 was seen as a breakthrough in negotiations over a three-month humanitarian truce and the establishment of an independent, civilian-led government. However, critics argue that the agreement protects the interests of powerful actors, including the UAE, rather than prioritizing the needs of Sudanese civilians.
In conclusion, while the UAE has acknowledged some mistakes in its approach to Sudan, much work remains to be done to address the root causes of the conflict and ensure a peaceful resolution. The country's continued involvement in fueling the crisis raises questions about its commitment to human rights and stability in the region.
The UAE's backing of the RSF militia has come under intense scrutiny following reports of mass killings in El Fasher. While the UAE has condemned the atrocities, it has also shifted blame onto the army's failure to compromise. Critics argue that the Gulf state has a responsibility to take action against its proxies and that it is too little, too late.
The RSF militia has been linked to ethnic cleansing and other human rights abuses in Darfur. The UAE's relationship with the group's leader, Mohamed Hamdan Dagalo, or Hemedti, has also raised concerns over the country's involvement in fueling the conflict.
The Gulf state's interest in Sudan is largely driven by its strategic location on the Red Sea and its potential to secure access to gold reserves, which are a significant source of revenue for the UAE. However, critics argue that this interest has been pursued at the expense of human rights and stability in the region.
As the conflict continues, the international community is calling on the UAE to take action to resolve the crisis. The US hopes that Sudan's two key external players, Egypt and the UAE, will work together to press their proxies into a ceasefire. However, so far, talks have been unable to reach a breakthrough, suggesting that further engagement may be needed.
The joint statement by the Quad – comprising the US, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and the UAE – on September 12 was seen as a breakthrough in negotiations over a three-month humanitarian truce and the establishment of an independent, civilian-led government. However, critics argue that the agreement protects the interests of powerful actors, including the UAE, rather than prioritizing the needs of Sudanese civilians.
In conclusion, while the UAE has acknowledged some mistakes in its approach to Sudan, much work remains to be done to address the root causes of the conflict and ensure a peaceful resolution. The country's continued involvement in fueling the crisis raises questions about its commitment to human rights and stability in the region.
they're all like "we didn't want to impose sanctions" no really though, you backed the militia that's responsible for mass killings and ethnic cleansing 
what's going on with mohamed hamdan dagalo aka hemedti? he's like a human rights abuser and uae is just enabling him 
it's not right that they're more concerned with their own economy than people's lives 
but it's clear they're just looking out for themselves. when will we see some real action taken against those responsible? 
They've been so caught up in getting their gold reserves and Red Sea access that they ignored all the human rights abuses going on 
Like, what's more important than people's lives? It's not just about Sudan anymore, it's a big deal for the region too 
The fact that they're trying to blame the army now is so weak... I mean, can't you take responsibility for your own actions? 
And the Quad agreement was supposed to be a breakthrough, but really it just protected the interests of those powerful actors again 
. I mean, the UAE finally admits they messed up backing those militia guys, but it's like, too little, too late. They're always talking about human rights and stability, but all they care about is that gold reserve 
. I'm not saying they shouldn't be interested in the region, but come on, put people first! 
. I mean, if you're going to back a group that's committing atrocities, then own up to it and do something about it! It's not that hard 
. We need action, not just words. Let's see if they can follow through on that joint statement and actually make a difference 
.
the uae is still backing that militia even though they're linked to mass killings & ethnic cleansing it's like they don't wanna take responsibility for their own proxies 
but what really got me is that they're still after the gold reserves 
like, come on guys can you prioritize human lives over profits? 
I mean, shouldn't they have taken action sooner and imposed sanctions on those responsible for the 2021 coup? 
But at the same time, can we really blame them for trying to protect their interests in Sudan, especially with its strategic location and gold reserves? 