Widespread anger is boiling over in Hong Kong as the city struggles to come to terms with its deadliest fire in more than 70 years. The inferno, which tore through seven of the eight high-rise apartment buildings in Wang Fuk Court residential compound, has left hundreds missing and the death toll rising.
The cause of the fire remains a mystery, but one thing is clear: it has tapped into the deep-seated social anxiety about affordable housing that plagues Hong Kong. The city's sky-high property prices have led to tightly packed high-rise apartments that can become death traps when disaster strikes. For many, bamboo scaffolding - which was widely used in construction before being phased out by the government due to concerns over fire safety - has become a scapegoat.
The issue is becoming increasingly politicized, with some Hongkongers accusing the government of deflecting responsibility from the actual cause of the fire. The Labour Department had previously assured residents that bamboo scaffolding posed little risk of ignition, but many now question whether this was just a cover-up.
As the investigation into the fire heats up, concerns are growing about the independence of Hong Kong's judiciary. Traditionally, the city has held open inquiries into major tragedies, often led by an independent judge. However, with Beijing's tightening grip on power in Hong Kong, many experts believe that this is no longer possible.
The government has pledged HK$300m (Β£29.2m) to help residents affected by the fire, but some are demanding more action - and a full inquiry into what went wrong. The city's leader, John Lee, is under pressure to explain why the bamboo scaffolding was allowed to remain standing during the construction works.
The fire has also sparked fears about the upcoming Legislative Council elections, which are scheduled for December 7. Many worry that Beijing will use the disaster as a pretext to silence opposition and maintain its stranglehold on power in Hong Kong.
The cause of the fire remains a mystery, but one thing is clear: it has tapped into the deep-seated social anxiety about affordable housing that plagues Hong Kong. The city's sky-high property prices have led to tightly packed high-rise apartments that can become death traps when disaster strikes. For many, bamboo scaffolding - which was widely used in construction before being phased out by the government due to concerns over fire safety - has become a scapegoat.
The issue is becoming increasingly politicized, with some Hongkongers accusing the government of deflecting responsibility from the actual cause of the fire. The Labour Department had previously assured residents that bamboo scaffolding posed little risk of ignition, but many now question whether this was just a cover-up.
As the investigation into the fire heats up, concerns are growing about the independence of Hong Kong's judiciary. Traditionally, the city has held open inquiries into major tragedies, often led by an independent judge. However, with Beijing's tightening grip on power in Hong Kong, many experts believe that this is no longer possible.
The government has pledged HK$300m (Β£29.2m) to help residents affected by the fire, but some are demanding more action - and a full inquiry into what went wrong. The city's leader, John Lee, is under pressure to explain why the bamboo scaffolding was allowed to remain standing during the construction works.
The fire has also sparked fears about the upcoming Legislative Council elections, which are scheduled for December 7. Many worry that Beijing will use the disaster as a pretext to silence opposition and maintain its stranglehold on power in Hong Kong.