In the final weeks of New Jersey's special congressional election, a sudden influx of cash from pro-Israel donors has catapulted former Lieutenant Governor Tahesha Way into contention. A key player in a contentious battle that pits moderate Democrat Tahesha Way against more progressive challenger Tom Malinowski, these last-minute donations have injected new energy and momentum into her campaign.
According to Intercept analysis, 30 donors affiliated with groups including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its super PAC, United Democracy Project, have handed over a staggering $50,000 to Way's campaign in recent days. This represents a significant shift in strategy for AIPAC, which typically wields its influence against progressive candidates who are vocal critics of Israel.
The tide seems to be swinging in favor of moderate candidate Tahesha Way, whose platform is centered on fighting President Donald Trump’s agenda and promoting centrist policies. She has received endorsements from various organizations, including the Congressional Black Caucus PAC and the Democratic Association of Secretaries of State, which may help her shore up support among traditionally progressive voters.
In contrast, Tom Malinowski, a more liberal Democrat, has faced concerted opposition from AIPAC's United Democracy Project. The group has spent over $2.3 million on advertisements slamming Malinowski for supporting Trump’s deportation force, citing a 2019 bipartisan appropriations bill that funded the Department of Homeland Security. While many Democrats supported this bill, AIPAC is taking issue with Malinowski’s vote, a move seen as a deliberate attempt to undermine his chances.
While it remains unclear whether these donations will ultimately prove decisive in the election, they do signal a significant shift in AIPAC's strategy. By backing Way, a more moderate candidate over Malinowski, AIPAC may be attempting to build a broader pro-Israel coalition within the Democratic Party – potentially paving the way for more progressive candidates to emerge victorious in future contests.
It is worth noting that these latest developments come as The Intercept has long highlighted the challenges facing democracy in America. With corporate interests increasingly dominating the media landscape and billionaire oligarchs buying up news outlets, there are growing concerns about the erosion of free press freedoms in the United States.
As the election nears its conclusion, voters will be watching with interest to see how these last-minute donations affect the outcome. Will Tahesha Way's pro-Israel backing ultimately prove decisive, or will Tom Malinowski manage to rally support among progressive Democrats? The answer will depend on a range of factors, but one thing is certain – this election has all the makings of a closely contested and pivotal moment for American politics.
According to Intercept analysis, 30 donors affiliated with groups including the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and its super PAC, United Democracy Project, have handed over a staggering $50,000 to Way's campaign in recent days. This represents a significant shift in strategy for AIPAC, which typically wields its influence against progressive candidates who are vocal critics of Israel.
The tide seems to be swinging in favor of moderate candidate Tahesha Way, whose platform is centered on fighting President Donald Trump’s agenda and promoting centrist policies. She has received endorsements from various organizations, including the Congressional Black Caucus PAC and the Democratic Association of Secretaries of State, which may help her shore up support among traditionally progressive voters.
In contrast, Tom Malinowski, a more liberal Democrat, has faced concerted opposition from AIPAC's United Democracy Project. The group has spent over $2.3 million on advertisements slamming Malinowski for supporting Trump’s deportation force, citing a 2019 bipartisan appropriations bill that funded the Department of Homeland Security. While many Democrats supported this bill, AIPAC is taking issue with Malinowski’s vote, a move seen as a deliberate attempt to undermine his chances.
While it remains unclear whether these donations will ultimately prove decisive in the election, they do signal a significant shift in AIPAC's strategy. By backing Way, a more moderate candidate over Malinowski, AIPAC may be attempting to build a broader pro-Israel coalition within the Democratic Party – potentially paving the way for more progressive candidates to emerge victorious in future contests.
It is worth noting that these latest developments come as The Intercept has long highlighted the challenges facing democracy in America. With corporate interests increasingly dominating the media landscape and billionaire oligarchs buying up news outlets, there are growing concerns about the erosion of free press freedoms in the United States.
As the election nears its conclusion, voters will be watching with interest to see how these last-minute donations affect the outcome. Will Tahesha Way's pro-Israel backing ultimately prove decisive, or will Tom Malinowski manage to rally support among progressive Democrats? The answer will depend on a range of factors, but one thing is certain – this election has all the makings of a closely contested and pivotal moment for American politics.
just wondering if pro-Israel donors should be backing politicians they think share their views instead of trying to sway elections in their favor? seems like a lot of money being spent on something that might not even change the candidate's stance 
this could be a strategic move to build a broader pro-Israel coalition within the party, but it also feels like AIPAC is just trying to buy influence 
this election is so unpredictable, I don't know who to root for anymore...
.
the media landscape is getting more and more dominated by corporate interests and billionaires buying up news outlets which is basically like a recipe for disaster in terms of free press freedoms 
. i mean like we need to be careful about what we're consuming on the internet because it's not always as factual as it seems.
. The fact that AIPAC is shifting its strategy to back more moderate Democrats like Tahesha Way suggests they want to build a coalition of voters who are willing to compromise on key issues 
. It's an interesting dynamic, but I hope voters aren't swayed by the money 
.
...anyway, these last-minute donations could make all the difference, but what's up with Tom Malinowski getting roasted by AIPAC? 
I'm not saying it won't work, but the fact that they're trying so hard tells me they're worried about something...
This is some crazy stuff going down in New Jersey! I mean, $50k from AIPAC donors to Tahesha Way's campaign? That's wild 
. But it's also a sign of how polarized politics has become in this country. I just hope voters are aware of all the behind-the-scenes shenanigans going on and can make an informed decision at the polls 
.
. Let's keep an eye on how it all plays out!