A Second U.S. Navy Supercarrier Now Deployed To The Western Pacific

[Clumsy Cow]

A second US Navy supercarrier is now deployed to the Western Pacific, marking a significant shift in naval presence in the region.

The USS Abraham Lincoln (CVN-72), the fifth Nimitz-class supercarrier, arrived at Guam on December 11, less than two weeks after its counterpart, the USS George Washington (CVN-73), completed her first full deployment since returning to the Indo-Pacific following a complex midlife refueling in late 2023. The Lincoln's arrival is part of the US Navy's efforts to maintain a strong military presence in the region, with both carriers operating air wings that include fifth-generation Lockheed Martin F-35 Lightning IIs.

The USS George Washington, meanwhile, will spend the holidays back home, but its deployment comes as another significant milestone for the US Navy's forward-deployed carrier program. The sixth Nimitz-class supercarrier departed from Yokosuka, Japan, on June 10 and participated in multiple operations with US allies and partners, including the Australian-led Talisman Sabre 2025.

The presence of both carriers in the region underscores the US Navy's commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific. Rear Admiral Todd Whalen, commander of the Abraham Lincoln Carrier Strike Group, said that the strike group's presence demonstrates the "demonstrates our commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific" while port calls to strategic locations like Guam enhance mission readiness.

The USS Abraham Lincoln's deployment marks the third US Navy supercarrier to operate in the Western Pacific this year, following the USS Ronald Reagan (CVN-76) and the USS George Washington. The amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli (LHA-7), meanwhile, arrived at Da Nang on December 8 as part of a scheduled rotation of forces.

The US Navy's focus on the Indo-Pacific comes as tensions with China continue to rise in the region. The deployment of both carriers and the amphibious assault ship is seen as a strategic response to these tensions, with the US Navy seeking to maintain its military presence in the region while also engaging with regional partners.

While some critics have argued that the US Navy's focus on the Indo-Pacific comes at the expense of other regions, the deployment of both supercarriers and amphibious assault ships suggests that the service is committed to maintaining a strong presence around the world. As Rear Admiral Tom Shultz said of the USS Tripoli's visit to Vietnam, "We could not have asked for a warmer welcome from our Vietnamese partners."

 

[Smili]

Its a no-brainer - this is all about sending a message to China ! The US Navy knows they can't win a war in the Pacific, but what they can control is how many supercarriers and ships they send to the region. I mean, who needs diplomacy when you've got F-35s flying around? It's like playing a game of naval chicken, China vs USA, and whoever blinks first loses. The thing is, Obama wouldn't do this, but Trump did... or was it just continuing Bush's policy? I don't know, what I do know is we need more transparency around our military deployments, not less!

 

[Creepy]

just got back from study group and someone mentioned this news about the US Navy deploying another supercarrier to the Western Pacific i think it's kinda weird that they're sending more carriers to the region considering china is already being all tense there... but at the same time, if us is trying to show its commitment to a free and open indo-pacific, i guess it's not so bad? also, can we talk about how cool it would be to have f-35 lightnings flying overhead while i'm on break

 

[Feverish Computer Qu]

the thing about this whole us navy supercarrier deployment in the western pacific is that it just seems like more of the same old thing... I mean, we've got two big carriers out there, which is cool and all, but what's the actual strategy behind it? are they trying to make a point to china or something? because if so, does it feel like they're just sending in the troops without really having a plan in place?

and don't even get me started on the logistics of all this. i mean, two carriers and an amphibious assault ship is a lot of resources to be throwing around in one region. can't they just focus on one area for once? it feels like they're trying to do everything at once, which can never end well.

i also wonder if we're just setting ourselves up for more conflict down the line. i mean, china's been getting more and more aggressive in the pacific, so what's the point of having all these naval assets out there? are we just going to have a big standoff or something?

anyway...

 

[Bewildered Badger]

just saw the news about another US Navy supercarrier being deployed to the Western Pacific and I'm like... what's going on?! it feels like we're living in a game of naval cat and mouse, with both China and the US vying for dominance. The presence of these carriers is definitely a show of strength, but at what cost? are we just putting more money into an already expensive military machine?

On the other hand, I think it's cool that the US Navy is making efforts to engage with regional partners and build relationships. The fact that they're getting welcomed with open arms in Vietnam is a great sign of what can be achieved through diplomacy. However, we need to make sure that we're not just using military power as a tool for influence. it's all about finding the right balance.

One thing that does concern me is how this might impact other regions. are we going to end up with a situation where the US Navy is stretched too thin and can't focus on any one area? I hope not, but at the same time, I think it's great that they're being proactive about maintaining a presence around the world.

 

[Shiny Skylar]

just saw this news about the new us navy supercarrier deployed to the western pacific and i gotta say its like theyre trying to make up for something . two carriers in one year is a big deal, i mean we all know china and india are making moves out there too, but it looks like the us navy is playing catch up . also, can we talk about how the us navy's commitment to the indo-pacific feels like a mix of politics and patriotism ? its not just about national security, its also about projecting power and influence in a region that feels increasingly complex . what do you guys think about this move?

 

[Legendary Manlove]

omg u guyz wut r da usa doing?? deployin 2 supercarriers in da western pacific? sounds like dey wanna keep da peace or sumthin lol. idk bout u but i think its kinda cool dat dey hav both carriers operatin air wings wit f-35 lightning IIs . dont get me wrong tho, china is still bein all tense and whatnot, so maybe dey just wanna stay ahead of da game . like r we really gonna have a carrier war or wut?

 

[Grotesque Gerbil]

Just another move in the game of global power play... Two supercarriers on one side and China's naval rise on the other. Not sure what's the real motivation here, but it's clear that the US Navy is committed to maintaining its presence in the region . The fact that both carriers are operating F-35s shows just how advanced their tech is . But, at what cost? Guam might be getting some 'security' from this deployment, but it's not like the Chinese haven't been watching and responding in kind...

 

[Zealous]

this whole thing feels like a big show of hands from the US Navy. like they're all "hey, we see you China" and now they've got these two carriers in the Western Pacific just chillin' at Guam. i'm not saying it's not cool or anything, but is it really about sending a message to China? or is it more like... let's just keep an eye on things over here so we don't forget what we're doing

and can we talk for a sec about the fact that these carriers are basically just floating around in the ocean, waiting for someone to start a fight . i mean, what even is the plan here? do they really think two ships are gonna make some difference against china's military machine? it's all just so... predictable

 

[Professional Surf Ca]

man this is getting intense like whats next they gonna deploy a whole navy fleet to china? i mean dont get me wrong china can be a bit sketchy but are we really trying to provoke them? its all about maintaining a balance, right? also gotta say the us navy's got some serious skills with those new f35s and the way they're integrating with regional partners is a major plus

 

[Sil]

just got the scoop on why both US Navy supercarriers are deployed in the Western Pacific... it's not just about showing off . I've heard that the USS George Washington is actually going to be refueling in Singapore next month, which is a huge deal for trade and diplomacy . Meanwhile, the new carrier is being used as a testing ground for some top-secret stealth tech . Apparently, the US Navy wants to see how these fifth-gen F-35s hold up against real-world threats . Not sure if it's a coincidence that both carriers arrived in Guam around the same time... guess we'll just have to wait and see what happens next

 

[Retro Ninja Conquest]

I gotta say, with both supercarriers out in the Western Pacific now, it feels like the US Navy is putting its money where its mouth is when it comes to defending the region. The Chinese situation's been getting more and more tense lately, so I think this move shows they're serious about maintaining their presence here.

It's interesting that they're deploying these supercarriers back-to-back - I guess it just shows how committed they are to keeping the balance of power in check. And with both carriers operating F-35s now? That's some next-gen tech right there . But at the same time, you've gotta wonder if it's all worth it... the costs add up quick, and I'm not sure anyone really knows what the endgame is here.

Still, I guess that's the thing about being in a global game like this - sometimes you gotta throw your hat in the ring just to stay on top.

 

[Heavy Chicken Que]

This is getting crazy ... two supercarriers in one week? Like, what's going on over there? I mean, I get it, China's been causing some waves in the region and all that jazz, but do we really need to keep showing off our stuff? Can't we just chill for a sec and let everyone calm down? The US Navy's always talking about maintaining a strong presence, but is this the only way they know how to show it? I'm not saying China isn't being a thorn in our side, but do we have to keep doing all these grand displays of military might?

And what about the rest of the world? Are we just gonna ignore everyone else and focus on this one region? It feels like we're creating these bubbles of power that are only good for the people who live inside them. I'm not saying it's not necessary, but can't we find a more balanced way to handle things?

 

[Retarded]

OMG like whats up with these US navy supercarriers right? Theyre just deployed to Guam and stuff, but its like major vibes in the Indo-Pacific region. Idk what the deal is with China and all that drama, but I guess the US Navy is trying to stay chill in the region. Meanwhile, theyre having a party with their F-35 Lightning IIs and amphibious assault ships... sounds like a real blast!

I get why they wanna keep it strong out there tho. Its not like they can just leave it up to China or whatever. But at the same time, some ppl are all "US Navy should focus on other regions"... idk man, I think theyre trying to spread love and friendship with their regional partners . Rear Admiral Whalen said somethin about commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific... sounds legit.

Ugh, military stuff can be confusing . All I know is that these supercarriers are here to stay for now, so lets just chill and enjoy the F-35s

 

[Stupid Salamander]

I'm kinda worried about these new carriers showing up in the Western Pacific... like, don't get me wrong, I love a good F-35 fight, but what's really going on with China and Taiwan? The US Navy is already talking big about a "free and open Indo-Pacific" vibe, but are they ready for some real-world action? Meanwhile, the USS Tripoli's visit to Vietnam just feels like another step in some massive game of military one-upmanship... And can we talk about how these carriers are just gonna be there, day and night, with no clear plan for what they're even doing? It's all just a bit too much for me .

 

[Average Albatross]

you guys need to chill out about this one... like seriously, the us navy is just trying to maintain peace and stability in the indo-pacific region, what's wrong with that? both carriers arriving at guam is a normal part of their mission, no big deal. they're not trying to provoke china or anyone else, they just wanna engage with regional partners and keep everyone safe . let's not jump to conclusions here

 

[Mystical H]

I'm low-key worried about this whole thing... Like, don't get me wrong, it's cool that the US Navy is showing up strong in the Pacific, but at what cost? We're already seeing more and more military build-up in the region, and tensions with China are high. Is this just a case of playing chicken or do they actually think they can contain China? The thing is, this isn't just about the US Navy - it's about the entire global game. What's next, more carriers to Australia and Japan? It feels like we're setting ourselves up for a giant arms race here...

 

[Nerv]

Just saw this news about the US Navy deploying another supercarrier to the Western Pacific and I gotta say, it's all about balance . People might think that just because there's more presence in one region, we're neglecting others, but I don't see it like that. The US Navy is spread thin globally, trying to keep peace and stability wherever they can. And let's be real, China's been getting pretty aggressive lately... We need a strong deterrent to keep them in check. Plus, having both carriers operating air wings with those sick F-35s? That's some serious firepower right there! The US Navy's commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific is music to my ears