The article discusses the ongoing bird flu outbreak in the US, which has resulted in the deaths of over 182 million birds and significant economic losses for the egg, turkey, and dairy industries. However, the US poultry industry is resisting vaccination efforts, citing concerns about trade implications.
Experts argue that this approach is shortsighted and puts the financial well-being of the chicken meat industry above the health and welfare of animals, farm workers, and consumers. They point out that the cost of not vaccinating is much higher than the economic damage it would do to the chicken meat industry.
The article cites a former USDA chief veterinary officer who suggests that the US could show trading partners how it would protect them from unsafe poultry exports through vaccination, similar to France's approach with duck producers. However, the USDA has been slow to develop and implement a national vaccination plan for egg-laying hens and turkeys.
As a result, the burden of bird flu falls disproportionately on vulnerable groups, including animals, farm workers, and consumers. The article concludes that policymakers must take a more holistic approach to addressing the industry's crisis, prioritizing animal welfare, public health, and environmental concerns alongside economic considerations.
Experts argue that this approach is shortsighted and puts the financial well-being of the chicken meat industry above the health and welfare of animals, farm workers, and consumers. They point out that the cost of not vaccinating is much higher than the economic damage it would do to the chicken meat industry.
The article cites a former USDA chief veterinary officer who suggests that the US could show trading partners how it would protect them from unsafe poultry exports through vaccination, similar to France's approach with duck producers. However, the USDA has been slow to develop and implement a national vaccination plan for egg-laying hens and turkeys.
As a result, the burden of bird flu falls disproportionately on vulnerable groups, including animals, farm workers, and consumers. The article concludes that policymakers must take a more holistic approach to addressing the industry's crisis, prioritizing animal welfare, public health, and environmental concerns alongside economic considerations.