Israeli Military Chief Suggests 'Yellow Line' as Permanent Border, Contradicting Ceasefire Agreement
The concept of the "yellow line" dividing Gaza under Donald Trump's ceasefire plan has taken on a new dimension. Eyal Zamir, Israel's military chief, has stated that the demarcation line is effectively a "new border" for Israel, underscoring the country's intent to maintain control over significant portions of the territory.
According to Zamir, the yellow line serves as a forward defensive line for Israeli communities and an operational boundary for military activity. This assertion appears at odds with the ceasefire agreement signed in October, which explicitly states that "Israel will not occupy or annex Gaza."
The current military configuration gives Israel control over more than half of Gaza, including agricultural land and the border crossing with Egypt. Zamir's position suggests a lasting commitment to maintain these positions, raising concerns about the feasibility of a two-state solution.
Trump's 20-point plan calls for Israel to "progressively hand over" Palestinian territory to an international security force until they have withdrawn completely from Gaza, except for a small security perimeter by the border. However, the implementation of this agreement has been hindered by various factors, including the lack of commitment from countries willing to participate in a peacekeeping force.
The construction of new concrete outposts along the yellow line has further entrenched Israel's military presence in the territory. Satellite images have revealed that markers are sometimes placed hundreds of meters beyond the agreed-upon boundary, sparking questions about the enforcement of the ceasefire agreement.
The US military has been planning for the long-term partition of Gaza along the yellow line, with one official describing reunification as "aspirational." Documents obtained by The Guardian outline a divided territory, with a "green zone" under Israeli and international control where reconstruction would begin, while the "red zone" remains indefinitely in ruins.
As tensions continue to simmer in the region, Zamir's statement has significant implications for the future of the peace process.
The concept of the "yellow line" dividing Gaza under Donald Trump's ceasefire plan has taken on a new dimension. Eyal Zamir, Israel's military chief, has stated that the demarcation line is effectively a "new border" for Israel, underscoring the country's intent to maintain control over significant portions of the territory.
According to Zamir, the yellow line serves as a forward defensive line for Israeli communities and an operational boundary for military activity. This assertion appears at odds with the ceasefire agreement signed in October, which explicitly states that "Israel will not occupy or annex Gaza."
The current military configuration gives Israel control over more than half of Gaza, including agricultural land and the border crossing with Egypt. Zamir's position suggests a lasting commitment to maintain these positions, raising concerns about the feasibility of a two-state solution.
Trump's 20-point plan calls for Israel to "progressively hand over" Palestinian territory to an international security force until they have withdrawn completely from Gaza, except for a small security perimeter by the border. However, the implementation of this agreement has been hindered by various factors, including the lack of commitment from countries willing to participate in a peacekeeping force.
The construction of new concrete outposts along the yellow line has further entrenched Israel's military presence in the territory. Satellite images have revealed that markers are sometimes placed hundreds of meters beyond the agreed-upon boundary, sparking questions about the enforcement of the ceasefire agreement.
The US military has been planning for the long-term partition of Gaza along the yellow line, with one official describing reunification as "aspirational." Documents obtained by The Guardian outline a divided territory, with a "green zone" under Israeli and international control where reconstruction would begin, while the "red zone" remains indefinitely in ruins.
As tensions continue to simmer in the region, Zamir's statement has significant implications for the future of the peace process.