US Customs Agency Illegally Targets Activists with Subpoenas, Warns Senator
Senator Ron Wyden has accused the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of abusing its customs law authority to unmask social media accounts tracking immigration authorities. This is not the first time DHS has used this power to silence critics.
The controversy centers around an attempt by the Trump administration to force Instagram and Facebook accounts monitoring immigration agents in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, to disclose their identities. The accounts, which track immigration authorities, are using social media platforms to raise awareness about issues related to immigration enforcement.
DHS is allegedly using its authority to investigate customs imports as a pretext for targeting these activists, rather than enforcing customs laws. This move has been condemned by Senator Wyden, who says that DHS appears to be "abusing" this authority to repress First Amendment protected speech.
In a letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, Senator Wyden asked the government to cease using this authority and to comply with statutory limitations on its use. He notes that CBP has a history of misusing this power to obtain records unrelated to import of merchandise or customs duties.
This is not an isolated incident. In 2017, The Intercept reported an attempt by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to reveal the identity of the operator of a Twitter account critical of President Donald Trump. CBP invoked its authority to investigate tariffs without explanation, but eventually rescinded its summons after public outcry and scrutiny from Senator Wyden.
The current controversy highlights concerns about the erosion of press freedom in the US and the use of government power to silence critics. The Intercept has been at the forefront of covering this issue, highlighting the need for a free and independent press to defend democracy.
As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how DHS will respond to Senator Wyden's concerns and whether the administration will respect the rights of activists to express themselves freely on social media.
Senator Ron Wyden has accused the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) of abusing its customs law authority to unmask social media accounts tracking immigration authorities. This is not the first time DHS has used this power to silence critics.
The controversy centers around an attempt by the Trump administration to force Instagram and Facebook accounts monitoring immigration agents in Montgomery County, Pennsylvania, to disclose their identities. The accounts, which track immigration authorities, are using social media platforms to raise awareness about issues related to immigration enforcement.
DHS is allegedly using its authority to investigate customs imports as a pretext for targeting these activists, rather than enforcing customs laws. This move has been condemned by Senator Wyden, who says that DHS appears to be "abusing" this authority to repress First Amendment protected speech.
In a letter to DHS Secretary Kristi Noem, Senator Wyden asked the government to cease using this authority and to comply with statutory limitations on its use. He notes that CBP has a history of misusing this power to obtain records unrelated to import of merchandise or customs duties.
This is not an isolated incident. In 2017, The Intercept reported an attempt by U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) to reveal the identity of the operator of a Twitter account critical of President Donald Trump. CBP invoked its authority to investigate tariffs without explanation, but eventually rescinded its summons after public outcry and scrutiny from Senator Wyden.
The current controversy highlights concerns about the erosion of press freedom in the US and the use of government power to silence critics. The Intercept has been at the forefront of covering this issue, highlighting the need for a free and independent press to defend democracy.
As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how DHS will respond to Senator Wyden's concerns and whether the administration will respect the rights of activists to express themselves freely on social media.