You know what's kinda weird about this whole thing? We spend so much time chasing after 'better' cleaning products, trying to outdo each other in a never-ending cycle of innovation 
. But sometimes, I wonder if we're just settling for mediocrity because that's all we've been conditioned to expect 
. Like, the Dyson V16 Piston Animal is still a solid product, don't get me wrong, but is it really 'better' than what came before? Is it worth the extra cash and hype? I think we need to take a step back and ask ourselves, what's driving our desire for perfection in cleaning? Is it just about convenience, or is there something deeper going on? 
. But sometimes, I wonder if we're just settling for mediocrity because that's all we've been conditioned to expect . Like, the Dyson V16 Piston Animal is still a solid product, don't get me wrong, but is it really 'better' than what came before? Is it worth the extra cash and hype? I think we need to take a step back and ask ourselves, what's driving our desire for perfection in cleaning? Is it just about convenience, or is there something deeper going on? 
. Can't they just give us a straight up answer? Like, "it's okay" or "not impressed"? Noooo, they gotta list all the pros and cons like it's some kind of sales pitch 
. And what's with the constant comparison to other models? Who cares if it doesn't do as well as its predecessor? 
I mean, I know I'm looking for a reliable vacuum but come on, can't we just focus on the present? 
The fact that it's cordless and lightweight is a huge plus in my book, though 
. And 30% of flour getting left behind? That's a major con in my book 
. Overall, I'd say this vacuum is just "meh" 
.