Gloomy prospects for a planet on fire emerged from the 30th Conference of the Parties (Cop30) in Belém, Brazil, as the world's top climate diplomats managed to strike a fragile deal that keeps the fight for a livable future alive.
In stark contrast to what was expected, countries came together, united in their determination to tackle the existential threat posed by global warming, and resisted the pressure from powerful nations like Saudi Arabia to undermine efforts to limit carbon emissions. The UN's climate chief Simon Stiell acknowledged that this Cop had taken place in stormy political waters but said climate cooperation was still alive and kicking.
However, progress is being viewed as incremental at best and insufficient to tackle the rapidly accelerating climate crisis. Greenpeace International's deputy programme director Jasper Inventor described Cop30 as a "moment to move from negotiations to implementation" that slipped away, while the EU's environment commissioner Wopke Hoekstra expressed relief that a deal was reached but noted it wasn't perfect.
Despite acknowledging that many will be disappointed with the level of ambition in the agreement, Anna Åberg of the thinktank Chatham House welcomed that the talks did not collapse. But others were more critical - such as climate scientist James Dyke who branded the outcome "shameful" for lacking a commitment to phasing out fossil fuels.
This fragile deal is unlikely to satisfy the demands of civil society, with Indigenous groups and activists taking issue with limited participation and the absence of direct references to fossil fuels. The frustration was palpable, as protesters marched in their tens of thousands to demand action on climate change and a shift towards renewable energy sources.
In stark contrast to what was expected, countries came together, united in their determination to tackle the existential threat posed by global warming, and resisted the pressure from powerful nations like Saudi Arabia to undermine efforts to limit carbon emissions. The UN's climate chief Simon Stiell acknowledged that this Cop had taken place in stormy political waters but said climate cooperation was still alive and kicking.
However, progress is being viewed as incremental at best and insufficient to tackle the rapidly accelerating climate crisis. Greenpeace International's deputy programme director Jasper Inventor described Cop30 as a "moment to move from negotiations to implementation" that slipped away, while the EU's environment commissioner Wopke Hoekstra expressed relief that a deal was reached but noted it wasn't perfect.
Despite acknowledging that many will be disappointed with the level of ambition in the agreement, Anna Åberg of the thinktank Chatham House welcomed that the talks did not collapse. But others were more critical - such as climate scientist James Dyke who branded the outcome "shameful" for lacking a commitment to phasing out fossil fuels.
This fragile deal is unlikely to satisfy the demands of civil society, with Indigenous groups and activists taking issue with limited participation and the absence of direct references to fossil fuels. The frustration was palpable, as protesters marched in their tens of thousands to demand action on climate change and a shift towards renewable energy sources.