In an apparent last-ditch effort to divert attention from the ongoing controversy surrounding Donald Trump's association with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, the Trump administration has chosen to shift focus to Bill and Hillary Clinton. This is not a new development; the administration has been trying to discredit the Clintons for months, but it seems they're finally getting somewhere.
The strategy doesn't seem to be working, however. Despite being subjected to a barrage of baseless accusations and subpoenas from the Republican-led House Oversight Committee, neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton has wavered in their stance that they have done nothing wrong. In fact, they've made it clear that they'll no longer comply with the committee's demands for testimony.
The real winners here are not the Trump administration or the republicans; it's the taxpayers who will foot the bill for this sideshow. With a Congressional budget of over $4 trillion, there's certainly enough money to be allocated to investigating actual crimes committed by high-ranking officials, rather than wasting resources on baseless investigations aimed at discrediting opponents.
As Jon Stewart astutely pointed out in recent weeks, if everyone is not playing by the same rules, then why should the Clintons comply with a process that seems designed to railroad them? The notion that these politicians can selectively choose when they'll cooperate and when they won't, based on their own self-interest, smacks of hypocrisy at best.
The only group that might benefit from this strategy is the far-right base that has been eager to see the Clintons demonized. However, even among this crowd, it's hard to find anyone who genuinely believes that holding the Clintons in contempt for refusing to comply with a process they claim is unfair will have the desired effect.
On the other hand, focusing on Bill and Hillary Clinton won't work for one simple reason: it's not as persuasive or compelling a narrative as the Trump administration's attempts to deflect attention from their own involvement with Epstein. The truth is that Trump's actions in this regard are far more egregious than anything Clinton has ever done.
In short, instead of trying to shift focus away from the real issues here – namely, the continued stonewalling by the Trump administration regarding the Epstein files – perhaps we should be focusing on holding them accountable for their actions. After all, as history books will tell us, it's not what you do when no one is watching that matters, but rather how you respond when you are held to account.
The strategy doesn't seem to be working, however. Despite being subjected to a barrage of baseless accusations and subpoenas from the Republican-led House Oversight Committee, neither Bill nor Hillary Clinton has wavered in their stance that they have done nothing wrong. In fact, they've made it clear that they'll no longer comply with the committee's demands for testimony.
The real winners here are not the Trump administration or the republicans; it's the taxpayers who will foot the bill for this sideshow. With a Congressional budget of over $4 trillion, there's certainly enough money to be allocated to investigating actual crimes committed by high-ranking officials, rather than wasting resources on baseless investigations aimed at discrediting opponents.
As Jon Stewart astutely pointed out in recent weeks, if everyone is not playing by the same rules, then why should the Clintons comply with a process that seems designed to railroad them? The notion that these politicians can selectively choose when they'll cooperate and when they won't, based on their own self-interest, smacks of hypocrisy at best.
The only group that might benefit from this strategy is the far-right base that has been eager to see the Clintons demonized. However, even among this crowd, it's hard to find anyone who genuinely believes that holding the Clintons in contempt for refusing to comply with a process they claim is unfair will have the desired effect.
On the other hand, focusing on Bill and Hillary Clinton won't work for one simple reason: it's not as persuasive or compelling a narrative as the Trump administration's attempts to deflect attention from their own involvement with Epstein. The truth is that Trump's actions in this regard are far more egregious than anything Clinton has ever done.
In short, instead of trying to shift focus away from the real issues here – namely, the continued stonewalling by the Trump administration regarding the Epstein files – perhaps we should be focusing on holding them accountable for their actions. After all, as history books will tell us, it's not what you do when no one is watching that matters, but rather how you respond when you are held to account.