The stakes are high as Britain navigates its uncertain relationship with Europe. Sir Keir Starmer's plan to focus on domestic issues has been disrupted by the escalating tensions between Donald Trump and Russia, as well as the US's aggressive move to secure Greenland from Denmark. The situation is made all the more volatile by Mr Trump's willingness to unilaterally take action, without regard for established institutions or alliances.
This raises a pressing question: what does Britain want? Sir Keir has consistently denied that pursuing closer economic ties with Europe poses a dilemma, but the evidence suggests otherwise. Brexit has brought costs and rewards, albeit not as many of the latter as expected. The shift in tone at Downing Street acknowledges this, while also ruling out reintegration into the single market, due to concerns over immigration.
However, it's hard to see how Britain can remain detached from Europe without sacrificing its strategic interests. Mr Trump's disdain for multilateral governance and his attempt to dismantle institutions that benefit America has raised eyebrows in Europe. The US president sees no value in historic alliances and has already begun reasserting American dominance, including through tariffs.
The Maga model of transatlantic relations – a Europe of individual client states under far-right leadership – seems increasingly relevant. This vision is at odds with the UK's position as a bridge between Europe and America. Mr Trump's ambition to wrest control of Greenland from Denmark highlights this tension. The US president's hostility towards the EU puts Britain in a precarious bind, reliant on security cooperation but no longer confident that Washington will be a reliable ally.
Sir Keir Starmer faces an unenviable task: balancing European solidarity with courtship of Mr Trump. His plan for closer economic ties with Europe is hamstrung by concerns over immigration and free movement of labour. The struggle to articulate a compelling national story, one that competes with the radical rhetoric of Reform UK, also demands hard choices and principled leadership.
Ultimately, Britain needs to establish its strategic interests in Europe, taking into account both domestic politics and foreign policy. The time for indecision is over – Sir Keir Starmer must assert his country's values and ambitions, unafraid to take a stand that may not be popular with all voters.
This raises a pressing question: what does Britain want? Sir Keir has consistently denied that pursuing closer economic ties with Europe poses a dilemma, but the evidence suggests otherwise. Brexit has brought costs and rewards, albeit not as many of the latter as expected. The shift in tone at Downing Street acknowledges this, while also ruling out reintegration into the single market, due to concerns over immigration.
However, it's hard to see how Britain can remain detached from Europe without sacrificing its strategic interests. Mr Trump's disdain for multilateral governance and his attempt to dismantle institutions that benefit America has raised eyebrows in Europe. The US president sees no value in historic alliances and has already begun reasserting American dominance, including through tariffs.
The Maga model of transatlantic relations – a Europe of individual client states under far-right leadership – seems increasingly relevant. This vision is at odds with the UK's position as a bridge between Europe and America. Mr Trump's ambition to wrest control of Greenland from Denmark highlights this tension. The US president's hostility towards the EU puts Britain in a precarious bind, reliant on security cooperation but no longer confident that Washington will be a reliable ally.
Sir Keir Starmer faces an unenviable task: balancing European solidarity with courtship of Mr Trump. His plan for closer economic ties with Europe is hamstrung by concerns over immigration and free movement of labour. The struggle to articulate a compelling national story, one that competes with the radical rhetoric of Reform UK, also demands hard choices and principled leadership.
Ultimately, Britain needs to establish its strategic interests in Europe, taking into account both domestic politics and foreign policy. The time for indecision is over – Sir Keir Starmer must assert his country's values and ambitions, unafraid to take a stand that may not be popular with all voters.