REPLAY: UK Prime Minister's questions over Mandelson-Epstein ties

UK Police Launch Probe into Peter Mandelson over Alleged Ties to Jeffrey Epstein

A criminal investigation has been launched by British police into the former UK Ambassador to the US, Peter Mandelson, amid revelations that he shared market-sensitive information with convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein several years ago.

Mandelson's appointment as ambassador was axed in September following his links to Epstein, and since then, the Labour politician has resigned from the party and announced his departure from the House of Lords. This latest development comes as Prime Minister Keir Starmer responded to the controversy during Prime Minister's Questions earlier today.

The news has raised eyebrows, with many questioning how this revelation slipped under the radar for so long. While details of the alleged exchange between Mandelson and Epstein remain scarce, the probe by British police underscores the gravity of the situation. The investigation is now underway, with officials scrambling to determine the extent of Mandelson's involvement.

In a surprise move, Starmer's office announced that no further action would be taken against Mandelson at this stage, stating that he had been acting in accordance with parliamentary rules at the time of the alleged incident. However, many are left wondering if sufficient action was indeed taken to protect national interests and prevent any potential conflicts of interest.

As the investigation unfolds, questions will undoubtedly arise about how Mandelson's ties to Epstein went undetected for so long, and what implications this has for his reputation and legacy within British politics.
 
๐Ÿ˜’ I'm not buying it... How did no one catch on that Epstein was a pedo? Did the UK just ignore the obvious signs of shady behavior? ๐Ÿค” This whole thing reeks of cover-up. What's really going on here? Is Starmer trying to whitewash Mandelson's name or what? ๐Ÿ™„ Sources please, we need to see some concrete evidence before we start accepting this as fact. Can't trust the spin from his office alone... ๐Ÿ“ฐ
 
I'm kinda surprised that it took this long for someone in a position like Peter Mandelson to get investigated over his ties to Jeffrey Epstein ๐Ÿค”๐Ÿ‘ฎโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I mean, everyone knows who Epstein is and what he's been accused of, so it seems pretty basic that you'd want to check out anyone connected to him, especially if they're supposed to be handling sensitive info for the UK ๐Ÿ’ผ.

I also think it's a bit weird that no one seemed to notice this stuff back in the day ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. I get that politicians are busy and all, but you'd think someone would've picked up on this sooner, especially if they were supposed to be representing the UK's interests abroad ๐ŸŒŽ.

Anyway, it's not like Mandelson's done anything wrong or anything... yet ๐Ÿ˜…. But still, this investigation should probably take a closer look at how much he actually got involved with Epstein and what he was doing behind the scenes ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ.
 
๐Ÿšจ๐Ÿ˜ฌ just heard about Peter Mandelson being probed by UK police over alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein... seriously though, how did we not know about this sooner? ๐Ÿค” It's like they were getting away with it all along... the whole thing gives me the heebie-jeebies. And now Starmer is saying no further action will be taken? ๐Ÿšซ that's just convenient. We need to see some real accountability here, you know? ๐Ÿ’ฏ
 
I'm low-key shocked that it took a criminal investigation to expose Peter Mandelson's alleged ties to Jeffrey Epstein ๐Ÿคฏ. I mean, we're talking about a guy who was basically running the UK's diplomatic machine in the US and nobody seemed to notice? It raises some serious questions about how our institutions handle sensitive info and conflict of interest.

I'm also not buying that he did everything by the book at the time ๐Ÿ˜’. It seems like there were definitely some red flags waving around, and it's hard to believe that no one saw fit to act on them. As for Keir Starmer's decision not to take further action against Mandelson, I think it's a safe bet that this is gonna come back to haunt him in the next election ๐Ÿ“Š.

Mandelson's reputation is already taking a hit, but if the investigation finds out he was more involved than we thought, his legacy in British politics is basically toast ๐Ÿ’€.
 
๐Ÿค” really think they can just sweep this under the rug? seems like a bunch of BS to me, especially with Starmer's office saying no further action will be taken... that doesn't add up ๐Ÿ™„. need more info on what exactly went down between Mandelson and Epstein before we can even begin to discuss this... sources needed!
 
๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿšจ another corrupt politician bites the dust ๐Ÿคฏ think they're above the law now but not on our watch ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™€๏ธ at least it's about time someone took a closer look at that sketchy Epstein connection ๐Ÿ’ธ๐Ÿ‘€ this whole thing is making me wanna roll my eyes out of my head ๐Ÿ™„ how long are we gonna keep turning a blind eye to these shady dealings? ๐Ÿ‘Ž๐Ÿ’”
 
OMG THIS IS SO SHOCKING!!! ๐Ÿคฏ i cant believe peters mandelson was involved with epstein and got away scot free ๐Ÿ™…โ€โ™‚๏ธ for so long!! how did the british police not catch on sooner?!?! it just goes to show you that power and connections can be super corrupting ๐Ÿค‘ and now keir starmer is saying no action will be taken... what a massive copout ๐Ÿ˜’ my gut is telling me there's more to this story than meets the eye ๐Ÿ‘€
 
I'm totally freaked out by this news ๐Ÿคฏ... like, how did nobody know about Peter Mandelson's alleged connection to Jeffrey Epstein until now? That's some serious whack detective work if you ask me ๐Ÿ˜‚. And what's up with his appointment as ambassador being axed but then getting reinstated when the probe started? It just seems so shady ๐Ÿค‘. I mean, I get that everyone makes mistakes, but this is on a whole different level... and now he's back in parliament? Is this some kind of British politics version of "too little, too late"? ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™‚๏ธ
 
man this is a total mess ๐Ÿคฏ Peter Mandelson sharing market-sensitive info with Epstein? that's some shady stuff I mean I know they're old friends or whatever but come on how did this not get picked up sooner? it's like he was just getting away with it and now the whole thing is blowing up on him. Starmer's office saying he didn't break any rules at the time? yeah right because that's exactly what we need more cover-ups. I'm all for transparency and accountability, especially when it comes to high-profile politicians. this probe is a good step in the right direction, but it's about time someone took action โ€“ or at least some serious scrutiny.
 
omg what a mess!! ๐Ÿคฏ i mean, i'm not surprised tho, all those ppl in power seem to have connections with some shady folks... like remember that whole hillary clinton email thing? ๐Ÿ“ง anywayz, peter mandelson's ties to jeffrey epstein are super sus... how did this go undetected 4 so long?! ๐Ÿ˜’ i'm glad the police r on it tho, gotta get to the bottom of this... and btw, what's up w/ keir starmer's office not taking further action? ๐Ÿค” seems like they're just letting mandelson slide...
 
๐Ÿค” This is getting more complicated by the minute... I mean, come on, a guy who was friends with a known sex offender and shares sensitive info with him? It's like a recipe for disaster! ๐Ÿšจ And now, the UK police are stepping in to investigate, which is good, but it raises even more questions. Like, how did this even happen under the radar for so long? ๐Ÿ˜• The fact that Starmer's office says no further action will be taken against Mandelson at this stage just doesn't add up. ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ It seems like they're trying to cover their own behinds rather than being transparent about what happened. I mean, it's not exactly a black-and-white situation, but some action needs to be taken to restore trust and accountability. โš ๏ธ
 
๐Ÿค” So, like, Peter Mandelson was friends with a super bad dude named Jeffrey Epstein, who did some really nasty stuff, right? And now the UK police are looking into whether Mandelson shared secrets about the market with him... which is basically insider trading ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ˜ณ. I don't get why this didn't come up sooner tho? Like, wasn't there someone investigating his friends before he got that high-up job in the US? How did it even slip under everyone's radar for so long? And what does it say about the whole system if a guy who's basically a sex offender gets to keep friendships with people in power without anyone batting an eye ๐Ÿ™„.
 
๐Ÿค” I mean come on... it's not like Peter Mandelson didn't know who Jeffrey Epstein was before he started sharing market-sensitive info with him ๐Ÿค‘๐Ÿ‘€ What's even more suspicious is that Starmer's office is saying no further action will be taken because Mandelson was following parliamentary rules at the time... that's just a cop-out ๐Ÿ˜’ I think this whole thing reeks of a cover-up and it's up to the police to get to the bottom of things ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ”
 
๐Ÿ˜ฑ๐Ÿšจ This is getting weirder by the day ๐Ÿคฏ... Can't believe it took UK police this long to kick off an investigation into Mandelson's ties to Epstein ๐Ÿ˜’. What kinda info was shared btw them? Something big enough to warrant a probe but small enough to fly under the radar for years? ๐Ÿค” This is like something out of a spy thriller ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ, and I'm not sure if we should be shocked or just concerned ๐Ÿ‘€.
 
omg is this even real? like peter mandelson was friends with epstein??? how could he not know that guy was a total creep?! ๐Ÿคฏ I mean i'm all about forgiveness and moving on but come on! ๐Ÿ˜‚ anyway, i gotta say im a huge stan for keir starmer - he's always trying to do what's right even if it means making tough decisions. can't wait to see how this whole thing plays out!!! ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ๐Ÿ”ฎ
 
๐Ÿค” I mean, think about it... a former ambassador sharing market-sensitive info with a convicted sex offender? That's like a red flag waving in the wind, you know? ๐Ÿ˜ฌ It doesn't matter if he thought he was just swapping business cards or whatever, the fact remains that this guy has some serious connections to Epstein. And now that we know about it, can we really trust Mandelson to make decisions that are in the best interest of the UK? ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ I'm not saying he's definitely guilty or anything, but the investigation needs to dig deeper and get to the bottom of this. It's like, what were these 'parliamentary rules' Starmer's office is talking about again? ๐Ÿ’โ€โ™€๏ธ
 
idk why ppl r getting worked up over this lol. mandelson did something shady with epstein but like, who hasn't made a deal with some dodgy guy in their past? it's not like he broke any laws or anything ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. and whats the big deal about him sharing market info with epstein anyway? like, what was the worst that could've happened? ๐Ÿค‘ the whole thing seems super blown out of proportion to me ๐Ÿ™„
 
OMG, I'm literally shocked by this news ๐Ÿคฏ! Like, I thought Peter Mandelson was above all this but I guess you never know, right? ๐Ÿ˜ณ The fact that he shared market-sensitive info with Epstein is so serious and I'm like, how did this even happen under the radar for so long? ๐Ÿ” It's totally understandable that Keir Starmer's office would wanna keep an eye on it now tho ๐Ÿ•ต๏ธโ€โ™‚๏ธ I hope they get to the bottom of this investigation ASAP, it's gotta be frustrating for everyone involved ๐Ÿคฆโ€โ™€๏ธ And poor Mandelson, his rep is gonna take a hit from this one... ๐Ÿ‘Ž
 
I'm really surprised by this development ๐Ÿค”. I mean, we've known that Peter Mandelson was close to Epstein, but to think he might have been sharing sensitive info with him... it's just not right ๐Ÿ˜ท. And now the police are looking into it? It's a big deal, and I hope they get to the bottom of it ASAP.

I'm also curious about how this slipped under the radar for so long ๐Ÿคทโ€โ™‚๏ธ. Did anyone suspect anything? It seems like a pretty serious breach of trust, especially given Epstein's shady past. And what about all the times Mandelson was spotted with Epstein at social events? It just doesn't add up.

I'm no expert, but it seems to me that there should be some real consequences for Mandelson here ๐Ÿค”. He's already resigned from politics and abandoned his party membership... why didn't he face more accountability sooner?
 
Back
Top