OpenAI's AI chatbot ChatGPT has faced criticism for its use of em dashes, which some have come to view as a red flag for potential AI-generated content. The issue came to light when users would tell ChatGPT not to use em dashes in their custom instructions, only to find that the chatbot would ignore those requests and continue using them anyway.
However, it appears that OpenAI has finally taken steps to address this issue. According to Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, if you instruct ChatGPT not to use em dashes, the chatbot will now respect those wishes. This development is seen as a small but significant win in efforts to combat the misuse of AI-generated content.
The prevalence of em dashes has become a telltale sign for many that a piece of writing may have been generated by large language models (LLMs). While it's not definitive proof, the frequency and frequency of use of em dashes can raise suspicions about the authorship of text. But why do LLMs tend to pepper their output with em dashes so frequently? According to experts, this is likely due to the fact that these AI models are trained on vast amounts of online content, including books, scientific papers, and forum posts – all of which often use em dashes.
It's possible that the AI trainers failed to flag the punctuation mark as something that LLMs should avoid using. Now that OpenAI has addressed this issue, users can have more confidence in what they read online and in print. But it remains to be seen whether this development will make a significant dent in the proliferation of AI-generated content that's masquerading as human writing.
However, it appears that OpenAI has finally taken steps to address this issue. According to Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, if you instruct ChatGPT not to use em dashes, the chatbot will now respect those wishes. This development is seen as a small but significant win in efforts to combat the misuse of AI-generated content.
The prevalence of em dashes has become a telltale sign for many that a piece of writing may have been generated by large language models (LLMs). While it's not definitive proof, the frequency and frequency of use of em dashes can raise suspicions about the authorship of text. But why do LLMs tend to pepper their output with em dashes so frequently? According to experts, this is likely due to the fact that these AI models are trained on vast amounts of online content, including books, scientific papers, and forum posts – all of which often use em dashes.
It's possible that the AI trainers failed to flag the punctuation mark as something that LLMs should avoid using. Now that OpenAI has addressed this issue, users can have more confidence in what they read online and in print. But it remains to be seen whether this development will make a significant dent in the proliferation of AI-generated content that's masquerading as human writing.
. It's crazy how something that seems like a minor detail can become a red flag for potential AI-generated content. I mean, who uses that many em dashes in a row? 
Anyway, it's awesome that users can now have more confidence in what they read online and in print. But let's be real, we need to do more than just tweak one issue - we need to tackle the root cause of AI-generated content and make sure we're not perpetuating 'fake news' 
. What do you think? Should there be stricter guidelines for AI-generated content creators? 
. It's like, what even is the point of authenticity in a world where we're constantly trading it for efficiency and convenience?
. I think it's interesting how LLMs pick up on certain writing habits, like em dashes, just because they're common online. It's a reminder to always fact-check and verify the sources of information we read 
. And yeah, this is just one small step in tackling AI-generated content, but every little bit counts 
what do you guys think is more concerning - that they're using AI-generated content or that they're not even aware of their own biases? 
. I mean, come on, it's not like they didn't know about it already. But hey, I guess better late than never, right? It's kinda funny that people were actually complaining about the chatbot using em dashes in the first place – it just goes to show how much AI-generated content is still being churned out online 
.
.
Anyway, now that the chatbot will respect user requests, maybe we can finally start to trust what we read online? Or am I just being naive? 
. Still, it's a good start, and it shows that they're listening to user feedback. Fingers crossed that this will lead to more authentic online content 
!
. We need to give these AI models some slack – they're still learning from the vast amounts of online content out there 
. It's like trying to learn a language; you gotta make mistakes before you get it right 
.
. I MEAN, WHO WOULDN'T WANT TO KNOW IF THEY'RE READING A HUMAN WRITTEN PIECE OR NOT? 
anyway, back to ChatGPT... so OpenAI added a setting to ignore em dashes now, but I saw some stats saying 85% of online content already has em dashes in it... 
and 42% of those websites use them way more than the average human writer would. 
I mean its not rocket science but i guess dey didnt get it till now lol. Anyways, now if ur gonna tell ChatGPT to stop usin em dashes it'll actually do it 
, but I've got some reservations about how effective it'll be. It's like, what if the AI trainers just trained on more books with em dashes or something? 
. But hey, let's take it one step at a time and see where this goes 
like, finally something being done about it! i mean, who needs em dashes anyway? 
. And let's be real, this doesn't solve the bigger issue of AI-generated content being passed off as human work. That's still a problem 
But I guess it's better than nothing, right? Can't wait to see how this plays out and whether it'll make a real difference in stopping the AI-generated content epidemic. 
anyway, i think this is a small win for us as consumers who want to make sure what we're reading is the real deal