Office for Budget Responsibility Chair Resigns Amid Public Finance Leak Inquiry, Chancellor Under Pressure
Richard Hughes, chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), has stepped down after a damning internal inquiry into the leak that threw Rachel Reeves's budget into chaos, with Hughes taking "full responsibility" for the watchdog's failure to handle sensitive information. The OBR's processes for protecting sensitive information were found to be inadequate, allowing market-sensitive report details to be accessed 43 times before Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng's speech.
The incident has sparked a fifth day of recriminations over the budget, with Keir Starmer failing to express confidence in Hughes. The Labour leader had criticized the OBR for the "serious error" and called it a breach of market-sensitive information and a "massive discourtesy" to parliament.
Opposition leaders, including Kemi Badenoch and Pete Wishart, have seized on the controversy to attack the Chancellor's decisions over the budget. While some Conservatives have defended Kwarteng, many are still under pressure following claims that there was a hole in public finances to justify tax rises, which has been denied by the government.
Labour officials have also questioned why Reeves refused to take responsibility for her handling of the budget, with Wishart accusing her of not restoring confidence after the leak. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Starmer's fate may be inextricably linked with Kwarteng's, raising questions about whether he will follow suit.
As the fallout from the OBR leak continues to reverberate through Westminster, many are left wondering what other skeletons are hidden in the government's economic plans. With significant challenges ahead and a tumultuous budget speech under his belt, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak must navigate the complex web of recriminations and blame-shifting that has engulfed his team.
The Chancellor has been told he will face contact with former Chancellors over previous fiscal events, which raises questions about accountability in government circles. It remains to be seen whether this development will draw a line under the tensions between the OBR and the government, or if more controversy is yet to come.
Richard Hughes, chair of the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR), has stepped down after a damning internal inquiry into the leak that threw Rachel Reeves's budget into chaos, with Hughes taking "full responsibility" for the watchdog's failure to handle sensitive information. The OBR's processes for protecting sensitive information were found to be inadequate, allowing market-sensitive report details to be accessed 43 times before Chancellor Kwasi Kwarteng's speech.
The incident has sparked a fifth day of recriminations over the budget, with Keir Starmer failing to express confidence in Hughes. The Labour leader had criticized the OBR for the "serious error" and called it a breach of market-sensitive information and a "massive discourtesy" to parliament.
Opposition leaders, including Kemi Badenoch and Pete Wishart, have seized on the controversy to attack the Chancellor's decisions over the budget. While some Conservatives have defended Kwarteng, many are still under pressure following claims that there was a hole in public finances to justify tax rises, which has been denied by the government.
Labour officials have also questioned why Reeves refused to take responsibility for her handling of the budget, with Wishart accusing her of not restoring confidence after the leak. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Starmer's fate may be inextricably linked with Kwarteng's, raising questions about whether he will follow suit.
As the fallout from the OBR leak continues to reverberate through Westminster, many are left wondering what other skeletons are hidden in the government's economic plans. With significant challenges ahead and a tumultuous budget speech under his belt, Prime Minister Rishi Sunak must navigate the complex web of recriminations and blame-shifting that has engulfed his team.
The Chancellor has been told he will face contact with former Chancellors over previous fiscal events, which raises questions about accountability in government circles. It remains to be seen whether this development will draw a line under the tensions between the OBR and the government, or if more controversy is yet to come.