US Military Strikes on Alleged Drug Boats Condemned by UN Human Rights Chief as Unacceptable.
The United States has destroyed yet another boat in the Eastern Pacific, killing four people and marking the 14th such strike since September 1. This latest incident brings the total death toll to at least 61, with two survivors and one person still unaccounted for.
In a shocking revelation, the Pentagon officials briefed by Representative Sara Jacobs revealed that they do not need to identify individuals on board these boats before conducting strikes, citing "extrajudicial killings" as justifiable only in cases where there is an imminent threat to life. This contradicts international human rights law, which requires lethal force to be used only as a last resort.
The UN's human rights chief Volker Turk has condemned the US military actions as "unacceptable" and called for immediate and independent investigations into these strikes. Turk stated that the use of deadly force in this manner is a clear breach of international law and must cease.
Turk emphasized that the intentional use of lethal force can only be justified in situations where there is an imminent threat to life, rather than against people suspected of carrying drugs. The UN chief's stance echoes Jacobs' concerns, who stated that these strikes are "completely illegal" even with congressional authorization.
The US military campaign has raised concerns about the safety of Caribbean nations, with some coasts becoming increasingly empty due to fear of US military presence and bombings. The situation is particularly dire in Trinidad and Tobago, where homes are being vacated as a result of the perceived danger posed by these strikes.
Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley has also expressed her concern about the escalating violence, stating that peace is critical to the region's stability and that it is now under threat. The use of force against suspected drug carriers remains a contentious issue, with many questioning the necessity and legitimacy of such actions.
The US administration's lack of transparency regarding its operations and the fact that they do not require conclusive evidence before conducting strikes raises further concerns about accountability and the rule of law.
The United States has destroyed yet another boat in the Eastern Pacific, killing four people and marking the 14th such strike since September 1. This latest incident brings the total death toll to at least 61, with two survivors and one person still unaccounted for.
In a shocking revelation, the Pentagon officials briefed by Representative Sara Jacobs revealed that they do not need to identify individuals on board these boats before conducting strikes, citing "extrajudicial killings" as justifiable only in cases where there is an imminent threat to life. This contradicts international human rights law, which requires lethal force to be used only as a last resort.
The UN's human rights chief Volker Turk has condemned the US military actions as "unacceptable" and called for immediate and independent investigations into these strikes. Turk stated that the use of deadly force in this manner is a clear breach of international law and must cease.
Turk emphasized that the intentional use of lethal force can only be justified in situations where there is an imminent threat to life, rather than against people suspected of carrying drugs. The UN chief's stance echoes Jacobs' concerns, who stated that these strikes are "completely illegal" even with congressional authorization.
The US military campaign has raised concerns about the safety of Caribbean nations, with some coasts becoming increasingly empty due to fear of US military presence and bombings. The situation is particularly dire in Trinidad and Tobago, where homes are being vacated as a result of the perceived danger posed by these strikes.
Barbados Prime Minister Mia Mottley has also expressed her concern about the escalating violence, stating that peace is critical to the region's stability and that it is now under threat. The use of force against suspected drug carriers remains a contentious issue, with many questioning the necessity and legitimacy of such actions.
The US administration's lack of transparency regarding its operations and the fact that they do not require conclusive evidence before conducting strikes raises further concerns about accountability and the rule of law.