Virgin Media's Bereavement Bungle Leaves Customer Stranded in Debt
A grieving husband has been left reeling after Virgin Media failed to transfer his wife's account to his name, leaving him paying more than double the amount he needed to for a cheaper package.
When his wife passed away 18 weeks ago, the bereaved man contacted Virgin Media to rectify the situation, only to be met with a series of delays and automated responses that left him feeling frustrated and exploited.
Initially, he was told that cancelling the existing contract would leave him without internet access for 14 days. However, the company offered an alternative: transferring the account to his name but changing it after 30 days. He opted for this option, hoping that the system would have updated by then.
However, three months on and a string of automated webchats later, he was still being told that the system hadn't updated – despite having explained his wife's passing multiple times. The customer was eventually promised a callback but never received one.
The result is that the grieving man is now paying £69.21 per month for an unwanted contract, whereas he had requested to be on a cheaper package for just £33.99. Virgin Media has since blamed new staff for giving him incorrect information, stating that he should have been able to close his wife's account and start a new deal with minimal disruption.
However, the company has now agreed to provide the customer with a new package at a lower monthly cost. The incident raises questions about corporate competence and callousness – particularly when dealing with grieving customers who are being forced to repeatedly explain their personal circumstances to unfeeling representatives.
A grieving husband has been left reeling after Virgin Media failed to transfer his wife's account to his name, leaving him paying more than double the amount he needed to for a cheaper package.
When his wife passed away 18 weeks ago, the bereaved man contacted Virgin Media to rectify the situation, only to be met with a series of delays and automated responses that left him feeling frustrated and exploited.
Initially, he was told that cancelling the existing contract would leave him without internet access for 14 days. However, the company offered an alternative: transferring the account to his name but changing it after 30 days. He opted for this option, hoping that the system would have updated by then.
However, three months on and a string of automated webchats later, he was still being told that the system hadn't updated – despite having explained his wife's passing multiple times. The customer was eventually promised a callback but never received one.
The result is that the grieving man is now paying £69.21 per month for an unwanted contract, whereas he had requested to be on a cheaper package for just £33.99. Virgin Media has since blamed new staff for giving him incorrect information, stating that he should have been able to close his wife's account and start a new deal with minimal disruption.
However, the company has now agreed to provide the customer with a new package at a lower monthly cost. The incident raises questions about corporate competence and callousness – particularly when dealing with grieving customers who are being forced to repeatedly explain their personal circumstances to unfeeling representatives.