European Leaders' Hysterical Reaction to Trump's Greenland Plans Exposed as 'Soft Power', Says Mandelson
Criticism is mounting from former Labour MP Peter Mandelson, who accuses European leaders of displaying a "histrionic" reaction to US President Donald Trump's plans for Greenland. Mandelson, who was sacked as Britain's ambassador to Washington last year, believes that without taking a more proactive stance on the issue, EU leaders will continue to lose relevance in the face of Trump's assertive approach.
Mandelson claims that European leaders have been too quick to dismiss Trump's intentions, with some even going so far as to lecture him on the importance of respecting Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland. The former US ambassador argues that this reaction betrays a lack of understanding about how Trump operates and his willingness to take bold action when necessary.
In an article for The Spectator, Mandelson suggests that European leaders have been living in denial about the changing global landscape and are guilty of underestimating the significance of Trump's presidency. He writes: "President Trump is not some populist disruptor bent on destroying it; it ceased to have meaning before he was elected."
Mandelson's remarks come as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been trying to navigate a delicate diplomatic situation in which the UK is caught between its commitment to international law and its desire to maintain good relations with Trump. Starmer recently signed a statement calling on the US president to respect Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland, while also acknowledging the importance of maintaining open communication channels.
However, Mandelson believes that this approach is naive and that European leaders need to adopt a more robust strategy if they are to remain relevant in the face of Trump's assertive policies. He argues that instead of simply criticizing Trump's actions, EU leaders should be focusing on how they can mitigate the consequences of his decisions and establish a new framework for international relations.
In essence, Mandelson is urging European leaders to accept that the rules-based system has already been eroded and that it is time for them to take responsibility for their own security and defence. He writes: "This will mean accepting that Trump's decisive approach when faced with real-world situations is preferable to the hand-wringing and analysis paralysis that has characterised some previous US administrations or, indeed, the deadlock and prevarication that so often characterise the UN and the EU respectively."
Criticism is mounting from former Labour MP Peter Mandelson, who accuses European leaders of displaying a "histrionic" reaction to US President Donald Trump's plans for Greenland. Mandelson, who was sacked as Britain's ambassador to Washington last year, believes that without taking a more proactive stance on the issue, EU leaders will continue to lose relevance in the face of Trump's assertive approach.
Mandelson claims that European leaders have been too quick to dismiss Trump's intentions, with some even going so far as to lecture him on the importance of respecting Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland. The former US ambassador argues that this reaction betrays a lack of understanding about how Trump operates and his willingness to take bold action when necessary.
In an article for The Spectator, Mandelson suggests that European leaders have been living in denial about the changing global landscape and are guilty of underestimating the significance of Trump's presidency. He writes: "President Trump is not some populist disruptor bent on destroying it; it ceased to have meaning before he was elected."
Mandelson's remarks come as British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has been trying to navigate a delicate diplomatic situation in which the UK is caught between its commitment to international law and its desire to maintain good relations with Trump. Starmer recently signed a statement calling on the US president to respect Denmark's sovereignty over Greenland, while also acknowledging the importance of maintaining open communication channels.
However, Mandelson believes that this approach is naive and that European leaders need to adopt a more robust strategy if they are to remain relevant in the face of Trump's assertive policies. He argues that instead of simply criticizing Trump's actions, EU leaders should be focusing on how they can mitigate the consequences of his decisions and establish a new framework for international relations.
In essence, Mandelson is urging European leaders to accept that the rules-based system has already been eroded and that it is time for them to take responsibility for their own security and defence. He writes: "This will mean accepting that Trump's decisive approach when faced with real-world situations is preferable to the hand-wringing and analysis paralysis that has characterised some previous US administrations or, indeed, the deadlock and prevarication that so often characterise the UN and the EU respectively."