The Internet Archive, a digital library of over 1 trillion web pages, has finally emerged from years of intense copyright battles that threatened to bankrupt the organization. However, its founder Brewster Kahle is left mourning what was lost in these fights.
Kahle says that while the archive survived, "it wiped out the library." The lawsuit against the Internet Archive's Open Library project led to over 500,000 books being removed from the archive's collection, causing significant harm to its mission. The loss of this material has left Kahle feeling that the world has become a "stupider" place.
The lawsuits were largely aimed at big media companies that wanted to control the flow of information. They argued that libraries like the Internet Archive's Open Library project damaged their market for e-book licenses, which provide only temporary access for a limited number of patrons and cost substantially more than acquiring physical books.
Kahle believes that these large corporations have an interest in controlling the flow of information, saying "that's what they really succeeded at—to make sure that Wikipedia readers don't get access to books." He argues that libraries serve as a research library, where people can cross-reference texts and verify facts, just like perusing books at a local library.
The Internet Archive is now planning to grow its digitization efforts, including a new project called Democracy's Library, which aims to create a free online compendium of government research and publications from around the world. The archive plans to position itself as a refuge for displaced collections, with hopes to digitize as much as possible while defending its early dream that the internet could equalize access to information.
Kahle is concerned about the future of libraries in the US, which he believes are losing support and may soon cease to perform classic functions like buying books from small publishers and local authors. He wants to re-architect copyright laws to ensure that there are "many winners" – where authors, publishers, and booksellers get paid, library missions are respected, and progress thrives.
The outcome of the lawsuits has left many fearing that big fines may delay digitization projects, as under-resourced libraries worry about costly litigation. The momentum behind AI risks giving corporations even more control over information, with critics warning of threats to US democracy.
As Kahle puts it, "Societies that are growing need to educate people and promote libraries." But when societies are going down, like in times of war, conflict, and social upheaval, libraries tend to get destroyed by the powerful. It's uncertain if archives dedicated to preserving the public memory will survive attacks from multiple fronts.
In conclusion, the Internet Archive's victory over its copyright battles has been tempered by the loss of significant material and the realization that the future of libraries in the US is uncertain. Kahle's vision for a more equal access to information and his commitment to re-architecting copyright laws are essential in preserving the public memory and promoting human progress.
Kahle says that while the archive survived, "it wiped out the library." The lawsuit against the Internet Archive's Open Library project led to over 500,000 books being removed from the archive's collection, causing significant harm to its mission. The loss of this material has left Kahle feeling that the world has become a "stupider" place.
The lawsuits were largely aimed at big media companies that wanted to control the flow of information. They argued that libraries like the Internet Archive's Open Library project damaged their market for e-book licenses, which provide only temporary access for a limited number of patrons and cost substantially more than acquiring physical books.
Kahle believes that these large corporations have an interest in controlling the flow of information, saying "that's what they really succeeded at—to make sure that Wikipedia readers don't get access to books." He argues that libraries serve as a research library, where people can cross-reference texts and verify facts, just like perusing books at a local library.
The Internet Archive is now planning to grow its digitization efforts, including a new project called Democracy's Library, which aims to create a free online compendium of government research and publications from around the world. The archive plans to position itself as a refuge for displaced collections, with hopes to digitize as much as possible while defending its early dream that the internet could equalize access to information.
Kahle is concerned about the future of libraries in the US, which he believes are losing support and may soon cease to perform classic functions like buying books from small publishers and local authors. He wants to re-architect copyright laws to ensure that there are "many winners" – where authors, publishers, and booksellers get paid, library missions are respected, and progress thrives.
The outcome of the lawsuits has left many fearing that big fines may delay digitization projects, as under-resourced libraries worry about costly litigation. The momentum behind AI risks giving corporations even more control over information, with critics warning of threats to US democracy.
As Kahle puts it, "Societies that are growing need to educate people and promote libraries." But when societies are going down, like in times of war, conflict, and social upheaval, libraries tend to get destroyed by the powerful. It's uncertain if archives dedicated to preserving the public memory will survive attacks from multiple fronts.
In conclusion, the Internet Archive's victory over its copyright battles has been tempered by the loss of significant material and the realization that the future of libraries in the US is uncertain. Kahle's vision for a more equal access to information and his commitment to re-architecting copyright laws are essential in preserving the public memory and promoting human progress.